Abstract
This chapter discusses the nature of knowledgeable others in Lesson Study for supporting teachers to internalise the principles of metacognitive teaching. A teaching development project aimed at crafting metacognitive pedagogies through using Lesson Study in a tripartite school partnership model—which consists of course instructors, teachers from partnership schools and pre-service teachers—was conducted to collect empirical evidence. The analytical lens of communities of and organisational learning were applied to analyse the socialisation of knowledge through Lesson Study. Five principles for designing metacognitive teaching were identified during the project. This chapter concludes that conducting Lesson Study enables teachers to become knowledgeable others and socialise their knowledge for instructional design to implement the competent-based curriculum effectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding; (Metakognition, motivation und Lernen (engl.)). Erlbaum.
Boykin, A., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Mastropieri, M. (2019). The impact of a computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the argumentative writing of students in inclusive cross-curricula settings. Computers & Education, 137, 78–90.
Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2013). Lesson study: Towards a collaborative approach to learning in initial teacher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537–554.
Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2014). Lesson Study: Towards a collaborative approach to learning in initial teacher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537–554.
Cerbin, W., & Kopp. B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250–257. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068058.
Cheng, E. C. K. (2009). Cultivating communities of practice via learning study for enhancing teacher learning. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 6(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.22804/kjep.2009.6.1.005.
Cheng, C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1–16.
Cheng, E. C. K. (2014). Learning study: Nurturing the instructional design and teaching competency of pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.869546.
Cheng, E. C. K. (2019). Successful transposition of Lesson Study: A knowledge management perspective. London: Springer.
Cheung, M. W., & Wong, Y. W. (2014). Does lesson study work? A systematic review on the effects of lesson study and learning study on teachers and students. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(2), 137–149.
Chong, W. H., & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263–283.
Downey, C., Byrne, J., & Souza, A. (2013). Researching the competence-based curriculum: Preface to a case study of four urban secondary schools. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 321–334.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Teachers’ reflective practice in Lesson Study: A tool for improving instructional practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 314–328.
Hartman, H. (2001). Devnneloping students’ metacognitive knowledge and skills metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 33–68). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Haston, W. (2007). Teacher modelling as an effective teaching strategy: Modelling is a technique that can help your students learn effectively in many situations. Music Educators Journal, 93(4), 26–30.
Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2019). Learning from teaching: Pre-service primary teachers’ perceived learning from engaging in formal lesson study. Irish Educational Studies, 38(3), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1613252.
Iksan, Z. H., Zakaria, E., & Daud, Md. Y. (2014). Model of lesson study approach during micro teaching. International Education Studies, 7(13), https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p253.
Kohen Z., & Kramarski, B. (2018). Promoting mathematics teachers’ pedagogical metacognition: A theoretical-practical model and case study. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 279–305). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_13.
Kolenda, R. L. (2007). Japanese lesson study, staff development, and science education reform—The Neshaminy story. Science Educator, 16(1), 29–33.
Kohlmeier, J., & Saye, J. (2017). Developing discussion leaders through Scaffolded lesson-study. The Social Studies, 108(1), 22–37.
Kolencik, P., & Hillwig, S. (2011). Encouraging metacognition: Supporting learners through metacognitive teaching strategies. Educational psychology: Critical pedagogical perspectives (Vol. 12). New York U.A.: Peter Lang.
Larson, B., & Keiper, T. (2013). Instructional strantegies for middle and high school (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Laski, E. V. (2013). Portfolio picks: An approach for developing children’s metacognition. YC Young Children, 68(3), 38–43.
Lau, K. L., & Chen, X. B. (2013). Perception of reading instruction and self-regulated learning: A comparison between Chinese students in Hong Kong and Beijing. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9265-6.
Lamb, P. (2015). Peer learning between pre-service teachers: Embracing lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2015-0012.
Lawrence, C. A., & Chong, W. H. (2010). Teacher collaborative learning through the lesson study: Identifying pathways for instructional success in a Singapore high school. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11(4), 565–572.
Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical maths for innovative societies: The role of metacognitive pedagogies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264223561-en.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 449–471.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118–124.
Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
Raines, D. A. (2018). Using a K-W-L chart to bridge the theory-practice gap. Nursing Education Perspectives, 39(3), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000256.
Ricks, T. E. (2011). Process reflection during Japanese lesson study experiences by prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 251–267.
Robinson, J. S. (2016). Applying the lesson study method in a graduate teaching methods course. NACTA Journal, 60(3), 288–292.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching gap (2nd ed.). The Free Press.
Susilo, H., Sudrajat, A. K., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). Using lesson study for capability development of undergraduate biology education students. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation, Malang, Indonesia, (1)ICLI, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008409001360144.
Thomas, N. (2014). Dual coding and common coding of memory. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/theories-memory.html.
Sarkar A., M. R., Reza, M., & Takenobu, F. (2009). Learning beyond boundaries: Japanese teachers learning to reflect and reflecting to learn, Child Research Net. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506400.pdf.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K., & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. Rural Educator, 26(2), 17–22.
Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE -Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.
Terrant, P., & Holt, D. (2016). Metacognition in the primary classroom. Routledge.
Veenman, M., Hout-Wolters, V., & Afflerbach, J. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Willems, I., & Van den Bossche, P. (2019). Lesson study effectiveness for teachers’ professional learning: A best evidence synthesis. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2019-0031.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, E.C.K., Chan, J.K.M. (2021). Internalisation of Metacognitive Teaching Through Lesson Study. In: Developing Metacognitive Teaching Strategies Through Lesson Study. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5569-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5569-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5568-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5569-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)