Skip to main content

Internalisation of Metacognitive Teaching Through Lesson Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Metacognitive Teaching Strategies Through Lesson Study

Abstract

This chapter discusses the nature of knowledgeable others in Lesson Study for supporting teachers to internalise the principles of metacognitive teaching. A teaching development project aimed at crafting metacognitive pedagogies through using Lesson Study in a tripartite school partnership model—which consists of course instructors, teachers from partnership schools and pre-service teachers—was conducted to collect empirical evidence. The analytical lens of communities of and organisational learning were applied to analyse the socialisation of knowledge through Lesson Study. Five principles for designing metacognitive teaching were identified during the project. This chapter concludes that conducting Lesson Study enables teachers to become knowledgeable others and socialise their knowledge for instructional design to implement the competent-based curriculum effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding; (Metakognition, motivation und Lernen (engl.)). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykin, A., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Mastropieri, M. (2019). The impact of a computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the argumentative writing of students in inclusive cross-curricula settings. Computers & Education, 137, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2013). Lesson study: Towards a collaborative approach to learning in initial teacher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2014). Lesson Study: Towards a collaborative approach to learning in initial teacher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerbin, W., & Kopp. B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250–257. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068058.

  • Cheng, E. C. K. (2009). Cultivating communities of practice via learning study for enhancing teacher learning. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 6(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.22804/kjep.2009.6.1.005.

  • Cheng, C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. C. K. (2014). Learning study: Nurturing the instructional design and teaching competency of pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.869546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. C. K. (2019). Successful transposition of Lesson Study: A knowledge management perspective. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. W., & Wong, Y. W. (2014). Does lesson study work? A systematic review on the effects of lesson study and learning study on teachers and students. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, W. H., & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, C., Byrne, J., & Souza, A. (2013). Researching the competence-based curriculum: Preface to a case study of four urban secondary schools. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Teachers’ reflective practice in Lesson Study: A tool for improving instructional practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 314–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H. (2001). Devnneloping students’ metacognitive knowledge and skills metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 33–68). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haston, W. (2007). Teacher modelling as an effective teaching strategy: Modelling is a technique that can help your students learn effectively in many situations. Music Educators Journal, 93(4), 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2019). Learning from teaching: Pre-service primary teachers’ perceived learning from engaging in formal lesson study. Irish Educational Studies, 38(3), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1613252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iksan, Z. H., Zakaria, E., & Daud, Md. Y. (2014). Model of lesson study approach during micro teaching. International Education Studies, 7(13), https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p253.

  • Kohen Z., & Kramarski, B. (2018). Promoting mathematics teachers’ pedagogical metacognition: A theoretical-practical model and case study. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 279–305). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_13.

  • Kolenda, R. L. (2007). Japanese lesson study, staff development, and science education reform—The Neshaminy story. Science Educator, 16(1), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmeier, J., & Saye, J. (2017). Developing discussion leaders through Scaffolded lesson-study. The Social Studies, 108(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolencik, P., & Hillwig, S. (2011). Encouraging metacognition: Supporting learners through metacognitive teaching strategies. Educational psychology: Critical pedagogical perspectives (Vol. 12). New York U.A.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B., & Keiper, T. (2013). Instructional strantegies for middle and high school (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laski, E. V. (2013). Portfolio picks: An approach for developing children’s metacognition. YC Young Children, 68(3), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, K. L., & Chen, X. B. (2013). Perception of reading instruction and self-regulated learning: A comparison between Chinese students in Hong Kong and Beijing. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9265-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, P. (2015). Peer learning between pre-service teachers: Embracing lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2015-0012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. A., & Chong, W. H. (2010). Teacher collaborative learning through the lesson study: Identifying pathways for instructional success in a Singapore high school. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11(4), 565–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical maths for innovative societies: The role of metacognitive pedagogies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264223561-en.

  • Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, D. A. (2018). Using a K-W-L chart to bridge the theory-practice gap. Nursing Education Perspectives, 39(3), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, T. E. (2011). Process reflection during Japanese lesson study experiences by prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. S. (2016). Applying the lesson study method in a graduate teaching methods course. NACTA Journal, 60(3), 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching gap (2nd ed.). The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susilo, H., Sudrajat, A. K., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). Using lesson study for capability development of undergraduate biology education students. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation, Malang, Indonesia, (1)ICLI, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008409001360144.

  • Thomas, N. (2014). Dual coding and common coding of memory. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/theories-memory.html.

  • Sarkar A., M. R., Reza, M., & Takenobu, F. (2009). Learning beyond boundaries: Japanese teachers learning to reflect and reflecting to learn, Child Research Net. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506400.pdf.

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K., & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. Rural Educator, 26(2), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE -Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrant, P., & Holt, D. (2016). Metacognition in the primary classroom. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M., Hout-Wolters, V., & Afflerbach, J. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, I., & Van den Bossche, P. (2019). Lesson study effectiveness for teachers’ professional learning: A best evidence synthesis. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2019-0031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric C. K. Cheng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, E.C.K., Chan, J.K.M. (2021). Internalisation of Metacognitive Teaching Through Lesson Study. In: Developing Metacognitive Teaching Strategies Through Lesson Study. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5569-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics