Skip to main content

Effects of the Elderly Population and of Political Factors in the US States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Population Aging

Abstract

The US has a relatively smaller elderly population than Japan: 15% are over 65 years old in the US in 2015, compared to 26% in Japan. But by 2050 the US proportion is expected to reach 22%. If the aged voters do not want to pay taxes for the programs benefiting children or young families, these programs may have smaller budget.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision; and US Census Bureau, Population Estimates and Projections.

  2. 2.

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-jan-16-me-54657-story.html.

  3. 3.

    https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/acs/ACS-38.pdf.

  4. 4.

    These are estimates of the American Community Survey, US Census Bureau.

  5. 5.

    The data on governors are obtained from the National Governors Association. Also, the data on state legislators are collected by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

  6. 6.

    The definitions are on https://www.census.gov/govs/definitions/index.html#p.

  7. 7.

    The value of the Sargan-Hansen statistic in Table 5.3 favors the fixed-effects model.

  8. 8.

    The test on fixed-effects versus random-effects models supports the adoption of fixed-effects model, as reported in Table 5.4.

  9. 9.

    Poterba (1997, 1998) and Harris et al. (2001) use total government revenues or expenditure in the calculation of the dependent variable.

References

  • Alt JE, Lowry RC (1994) Divided government and budget deficits: evidence from the states. Am Political Sci Rev 88(4):811–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Case A (2003) Political institutions and policy choices: evidence from the United States. J Econ Lit 41(1):7–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Garand JC (1988) Explaining government growth in the U.S. states. Am Political Sci Rev 82(3):837–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens M (1996) “Race coding” and white opposition to welfare. Am Political Sci Rev 90(3):593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris AR, Evans WN, Schwab RM (2001) Education spending in an aging America. J Public Econ 81(3):449–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes DP, McCrea AM (2018) Give us your tired, your poor and we might buy them dinner: social capital, immigration, and welfare generosity in the American States. Political Res Q 71(2):347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettich W, Winer SL (1988) Economic and political foundations of tax structure. Am Econ Rev 78(4):701–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich W, Winer SL (1999) Democratic choice and taxation: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd H (1975) Local education expenditures, fiscal capacity, and the composition of the property tax base. National Tax J 28(2):145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell M (1978) Spending for education: the exercise of public choice. Rev Econ Stat 60(4):487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler A, Richard S (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. J Political Econ 89(5):914–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C (1996) Demographics and spending for public education: a test of interest group influence. Econ Educ Rev 15(2):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons D (1982) Demographic effects on public charity to the aged. J Hum Res 17(1):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba JM (1997) Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. J Policy Anal Manage 16(1):48–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba JM (1998) Demographic change, intergenerational linkages, and public education. Am Econ Rev 88(2):315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts KWS (1977) Voting over income tax schedules. J Public Econ 8(3):329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DL, Rogers JH (2000) Political competition and state government size: do tighter elections produce looser budgets? Public Choice 105(1/2):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer T (1975) Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax. J Public Econ 4(2):163–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soss J, Fording RC, Schram SF (2008) The color of devolution: race, federalism, and the politics of social control. Am J Political Sci 52(3):536–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Political Econ 64(5):416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Terai, K., Glazer, A., Miyazato, N. (2021). Effects of the Elderly Population and of Political Factors in the US States. In: The Political Economy of Population Aging. Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, vol 30. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5536-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5536-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5535-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5536-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics