Skip to main content

The Cultural Distance Model: Empirical Evidence from India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring
  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

Public understanding of science (PUS) is an area of research using contributions from various areas of expertise but focusing on the borders between science and society. It is a recent but growing area of research with its own strengths and limitations. The first phase of its development involved attitudinal surveys in many countries to measure the public’s scientific knowledge and probe the public’s attitude towards science and scientists. In many countries, regular survey studies have underpinned the allocation of special budgetary provisions. Later, researchers refined their methodology and developed new analytical tools and techniques to gain deeper insights into PUS. In India, researchers from the National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (a unit of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) have worked since 1989 on techniques for surveys suitable for developing countries. As a consequence of that research, the research group has proposed a culturally sensitive model for evaluating the data. This chapter describes the historical background of the development of PUS research, with special reference to that simple but effective ‘cultural distance’ model. The authors confirm that the method of measuring cultural distance can be applied to various datasets to draw meaningful conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aslam M (2012) A diagramatic study of different models of mass-communication. Global Journal of Human Social Science, Arts & Humanities 12(13). https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume12/4-A-Diagramatic-Study-of-Different.pdf

  • Bensaude-Vincent B (2001) A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Underst Sci 10:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya N (1983) The cultural heritage of India: vol. IV: The religions. The Ramakrishna Mission, Institute of Culture, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (1963) The philosophy of rhetoric. Bitzer LF (ed). Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin W (2019) Technology, war and the state: past, present and future. International Affairs, July, 95(4):765–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow JPG (2014) Proof-reading Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 96(1):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant J (1993) What is scientific literacy? In: Durant J, Gregory J (eds) Science and culture in Europe. Science Museum, London, 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant J, Bauer M (1992) British public perception of astrology: an approach from the sociology of knowledge. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1999) A life of learning. Charles Homer Haskins Lecture for 1999, occasional paper no. 45, American Council of Learned Societies

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin B, Gingras Y (2000) What is scientific technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model. Public Underst Sci 9:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugsbakk G (2013) From Sputnik to PISA shock—new technology and educational reform in Norway and Sweden. Education Inquiry 4(4). https://www.tandfonline.com/author/Haugsbakk%2C+Geir

  • Hughes J (2003) The Manhattan Project: big science and the atom bomb. Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxster JK, Slater MH, Leddington J, LoPiccolo V, Bergman J, Jones M, McGlynn C, Diaz N, Aspinall N, Bresticker J, Hopkins M (2018) Understanding ‘understanding’ in public understanding of science. Public Underst Sci 27(7):756–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee O, Fradd SH, Sutman FX (1995) Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Research in Teaching 32(8):797–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis FR (1962) Two cultures? The significance of CP Snow. Chatto and Windus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller E (2010) Linguistic politics: creating a communication canon post World War II. McNair Journal, 6. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/mcnair_journal/vol6/iss1/11/

  • Miller S (2001) Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Underst Sci 10:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersons A, Khalimzoda LI (2016) Communication models and common basis for multicultural communication in Latvia. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Society. Integration. Education, 27–28 May, IV:423–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza G, Singh S, Dutt B, Chander J (1996) Confluence of science and people’s knowledge at the Sangam. Ishtihaar, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza G, Singh S, Dutt B, Wahid A (1991) Prototypes of the forms of scientific cognition: a survey of cultural attitude to natural phenomena. NISTADS reports I and II

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza G, Singh S, Kumar PVS, Dabiru L (2020) Pulse of the pandemic: a sudden surge in scientific attitude during Covid-19 crisis. Anhad and PMB Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza G, Dutt B, Singh S (1997) Kaleidoscoping public understanding of science on hygiene, health and plague: a survey in the aftermath of a plague epidemic in India. Public Underst Sci 6:247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter MW (1985) Science and public policy since World War II, Osiris, Historical Writing on American. Science 1:273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar Z, Loon BV (1997) Introducing cultural studies. Totem Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele DA, Krause NM (2019) Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 16 April, 116(16):7662–7669. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC6475373/citedby/

  • Shannon CE (1948a) A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, July, 27(3):379–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948b) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, October, 27 (4):623–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow CP ([1959] 1993) The two cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm KR, Clark F, Eblacas PR (2000) Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming. Public Underst Sci 9:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylor B ([1871] 1924) Primitive culture, 7th edition. Brentano’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1995) Public understanding of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Peterson JC, Pinch T (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, London, 361–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalta EN (ed.) (2010) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/

  • Zhongliang Z (1991) People and science: public attitude in China toward science and technology. Science and Public Opinion, October, 18:311–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 China Science and Technology Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raza, G., Singh, S. (2021). The Cultural Distance Model: Empirical Evidence from India. In: Schiele, B., Liu, X., Bauer, M.W. (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics