Abstract
The notion of science demonstrating responsibility to society by meeting the needs of society is key in current policymaking. Under the label of ‘responsible research and innovation’, many projects have been funded to study and stimulate practices of responsible science–society relationships, both within and outside Europe. Those projects collected insights into what constitutes a responsible science–society relationship and indicated how changes in that relationship are evolving, such as the roles and responsibilities of researchers and research institutes. In this chapter, findings are discussed to provide a broader and enriched cultural and international perspective on the changing science–society relationship. More specifically, results are derived from case studies in the Netherlands, South Africa and China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
NUCLEUS: Bringing RRI to life, www.nucleus-project.eu/.
- 2.
The Role of Universities in Innovation and Regional Development (RUNIN), https://runinproject.eu/.
References
Ahoba-Sam R, Atta Owusu K, Evers G, Fonseca L, Kopelyan S, Meloyan A, Nguyen H, Salomaa M, Alpaydin U, Cinar R, Fernandez-Guerrero D, Germain-Alamartine E, Manrique S, Moghadam-Saman S, Nieth L, Schuijff M (2019) Higher education institutes and the Twente Board: policy report. RUNIN Working Paper Series, no. 1. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, Enschede. doi: https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.01
Burget M, Bardone E, Pedaste M (2017) Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci Eng Ethics 23:1–19
Cormick C (2012) The complexity of public engagement. Nat Nanotechnol 7:77–78
European Commission (2019) Responsible research and innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/ horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation#Article
De Saille S (2015) Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘responsible research and innovation.’ Journal of Responsible Innovation 2:152–168
Dijkstra A, Heerink R, Van Den Berg M (2019) Pilot Samen grondwaterpeilen. Rapportage onderzoek WP4. Universiteit Twente, Enschede
Dijkstra AM, Schuijff M, Yin L, Mkansi S (2017) RRI in China and South Africa: cultural adaptation report. University of Twente, Enschede
Dijkstra AM, Yin L (2019) Insights from China for a global perspective on a responsible science–society relationship. Cultures of Science 2:65–76
Doran H (2016) NUCLEUS field trip report: civil society (Pretoria). Deliverable 4.4. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen
DST (Department of Science and Technology) (2019) White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation: science, technology and innovation enabling inclusive and sustainable South African development in a changing world. Pretoria, Republic of South Africa, Department of Science and Technology
Dublin City University, Genome Research Limited, Science View, University of Delft, Rhine-Waal University (2019) Final recommendations: institutionalised nuclei for RRI. Deliverable 5.5, NUCLEUS project
Fiorino DJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values 15:226–243
Fonseca L, Manrique S, Nguyen H, Benneworth P, Atta-Owusu K, Alpaydin U, Cinar R, Evers G, Fernandez Guerrero D, Germain-Alamartine E, Kopelyan S, Meloyan A, Moghadam-Saman S, Nieth L, Salomaa M, Schuijff M (2018) Reconnecting the university to the region of Twente: findings from the RUNIN – Design Lab Think Tank
Genome Research Ltd, Institute of Wetlands Research, Rhine-Waal University, Ruhr University Bochum, University of Malta, Dublin City University (2019) Embedded nuclei implementation report 1: China, Germany and Malta. Deliverable 5.4, NUCLEUS project
Haworth PS, Dijkstra AM (2019) Putting responsible research and innovation into practice at a local level in South Africa. In: Weingart P, Joubert M, Falade B (eds) Science communication in South Africa: reflections on current issues. African Minds, Cape Town
Mordan C, Skeldon K (2016) Field trip report: Beijing: RRI and public engagement.
NAS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine) (2017) Communicating science effectively: a research agenda. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Washington DC
Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, Gorman M, Fisher E, Guston D (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
Ren F, Zhai J (2014) Communication and popularization of science and technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Rip A (2014) The past and future of RRI. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10:17
Schuijff M, Dijkstra AM (2020) Practices of responsible research and innovation: a review. Sci Eng Ethics 26:533–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3
Shelley-Egan C, Bowman DM, Robinson DKR (2018) Devices of responsibility: over a decade of responsible research and innovation initiatives for nanotechnologies. Sci Eng Ethics 24:1719–1746
Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1568–1580
Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
Wickson F, Delgado A, Kjølberg KL (2010) Who or what is the public? Nat Nanotechnol 5:757
Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
Acknowledgements
This chapter is based, among other projects, on work from the NUCLEUS project that was funded by the European Union in the Horizon 2020 Science with and for Society programme (grant agreement number 664932). The Think Tank event was organized as a collaboration between the RUNIN project and NUCLEUS. The groundwater pilot project was a collaboration between researchers from the University of Twente, Saxion Applied University, Things Network Twente, the municipality of Enschede and VRM, and was financially supported by Twente47 and the province of Overijssel. I thank Clare Shelley-Egan for her feedback on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 China Science and Technology Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dijkstra, A.M. (2021). Meeting the Needs of Society: Experiences from Practices at the Science–Society Interface. In: Schiele, B., Liu, X., Bauer, M.W. (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5378-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5379-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)