Abstract
Autonomous vehicles promise to introduce artificially intelligent physical agents into uncontrolled social spaces for the first time. Public attitudes suggest uncertainty about the technology, but existing research focuses too much on engineering public acceptance instead of engaging with public concerns. I suggest that autonomous vehicles are a test case of the relationship between the public and artificial intelligence technologies and argue for the importance of a deeper, more carefully theorized understanding of public responses. This chapter reports a series of surveys designed to contribute to that effort.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Uberworld: The world’s most valuable startup is leading the race to transform the future of transport’, The Economist, 3 September 2016; ‘Driverless cars are stuck in a jam’, The Economist, 10 October 2019, https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/10/10/driverless-cars-are-stuck-in-a-jam.
- 2.
The surveys conducted in 2015 and 2016 were part of a consultancy project for Goodyear Tyre and Rubber Corporation: full details of this are provided in Tennant et al. (2016, 2019). Subsequent surveys were funded from departmental funds of the researchers at London School of Economics and City, University of London.
References
Abelson RP (1981) Psychological status of the script concept. Am Psychol 36(7):715–729
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1973) Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. J Pers Soc Psychol 27(1):41–57
Bansal P, Kockelman KM (2017) Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transp Res Part a: Policy and Practice 95:49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013
Bauer M (2015) Atoms, bytes and genes: public resistance and techno-scientific responses. Routledge, New York
Becker F, Axhausen KW (2017) Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation 44(6):1293–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9
Continental (2017) Driverless cars—the road to nowhere?, https://www.continental-tyres.co.uk/car/media-services/newsroom/driverless-cars-road-to-nowhere
Daziano RA, Sarrias M, Leard B (2017) Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part c: Emerg Technol 78:150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.003
European Commission (2015) Special Eurobarometer 427: Autonomous systems. http://ec.europa.eu/ommfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_427_en.pdf
European Commission (2017) Special Eurobarometer 460: Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/SPECIAL/surveyKy/2160
Gaskell G, Bard I, Allansdottir A, da Cunha RV, Eduard P, Hampel J, Zwart H (2017) Public views on gene editing and its uses. Nat Biotechnol 35(11):1021–1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3958
Gkartzonikas C, Gkritza K (2019) What have we learned? a review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part c: Emerg Technol 98:323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.003
Hildebrand JM (2019) On self-driving cars as a technological sublime. Techné: Res Philosop Technol 23(2):153–173
HLSTSC (House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee) (2016) Oral evidence to the autonomous vehicles inquiry, session 1, UK Parliament. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/ommitteeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee-lords/autonomous-vehicles/oral/42659.pdf
König M, Neumayr L (2017) Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car. Transp Res f: Traffic Psychol Behav 44:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter JCF (2015) Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp Res f: Traffic Psychol Behav 32:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
Liljamo T, Liimatainen H, Pöllänen M (2018) Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transp Res f: Traffic Psychol Behav 59:24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010
Norton PD (2008) Fighting traffic: the dawn of the motor age in the American city. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
O’Connor C, Joffe H (2013) How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence. Public Underst Sci 22(3):254–268
Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. Free Press, Collier Macmillan, New York and London
Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Yu Z, Biondi F, Cooper JM (2018) Cognitive underpinnings of beliefs and confidence in beliefs about fully automated vehicles. Transp Res f: Traffic Psychol Behav 55:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.029
Schoettle B, Sivak M (2014) Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the US, the UK and Australia. Transport Research Institute, University of Michigan. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/itstream/handle/2027.42/109433/103139.pdf?sequence=1
Sharples S, Moore T, Moran H, Burnett G, Meng X, Galea M, McAuley D (2016) Written evidence to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, AUV0049, UKÂ Parliament. http://data.parliament.uk/rittenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee-lords/autonomous-vehicles/written/41871.html
Stilgoe J (2019) Who’s driving? new technologies and the collaborative state. Palgrave, in press
Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Stirling A (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Human Values 33(2):262–294. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734034
Sturgis P, Allum N (2004) Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Underst Sci 13:55–74
Tennant C, Howard S, Franks B, Bauer MW, Stares S (2016) Autonomous vehicles—negotiating a place on the road: a study on how drivers feel about interacting with autonomous vehicles on the road. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.lse.ac.uk/business-and-consultancy/consulting/consulting-reports/autonomous-vehicles-negotiating-a-place-on-the-road
Tennant C, Stares S, Howard S (2019) Public discomfort at the prospect of autonomous vehicles: building on previous surveys to measure attitudes in 11 countries. Transp Res f: Traffic Psychol Behav 64:98–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.017
Tennant C, Stares S, Howard S, Hall M, Franks B, Bauer M (2015) The ripple effect of drivers’ behaviour on the road. Report submitted by LSE Enterprise to Goodyear. London School of Economics and Political Science. http://www.lse.ac.uk/business-and-consultancy/consulting/consulting-reports/the-ripple-effect-of-drivers-behaviour-on-the-road
Titcomb J (2016) Driverless cars to be unmarked to stop motorists bullying them. The Telegraph, 31Â October
TÃœV Rheinland (2018) TÃœV Rheinland releases wide-ranging study on global consumer perception of autonomous vehicle safety. News release, 15 February. https://insights.tuv.com/blog/t%C3%BCv-rheinland-releases-wide-ranging-study-on-global-consumer-perception-of-autonomous-vehicle-safety
You G, Smith M (2016) Majority of public would be scared to take a ride in a driverless car. YouGov, 26Â August. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2016/08/26/majority-public-would-be-scared-take-ride-driverle
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out by the author and Sally Stares at City, University of London. Dr Bradley Franks, Dr Matt Hall and Professor Martin Bauer of the London School of Economics also participated in earlier stages of the research. Dr Susan Howard provided advice and assistance to the main researchers throughout the programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
This appendix lists survey items used to build the main scales mentioned in this chapter, provided by replicating the relevant questions (for example, Q13) from the 2017 survey.
Perceptions of AV (PAV) scale
The Perceptions of AV (PAV) scale comprises items in Q13 and Q16. Those items used in the scale are highlighted in italics, and (R) denotes where we reversed the scoring direction for the item, so that higher values in all cases indicate more positive attitudes towards AVs.
‘Please think about your reasons for the choice you made in answering the previous question about driving alongside autonomous (driverless) cars and respond to the next set of questions.’
Q13. ‘Thinking about your choice in the previous question, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?’
Response options: Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree, Don’t know.
-
Most accidents are caused by human error so autonomous vehicles would be safer
-
I wouldn’t mind whether I was driving alongside human drivers or autonomous vehicles
-
I don’t know enough about how autonomous vehicles work
-
Autonomous cars could malfunction (R)
-
As a point of principle, humans should be in control of their vehicles at all times (R)
-
I feel that autonomous cars would pose more risk to me than other drivers pose
-
Autonomous cars could greatly reduce congestion
-
I’d be scared seeing an autonomous car with no driver inside
-
I wouldn’t feel in control with autonomous cars on the road around
-
Autonomous cars would behave more predictably than human drivers
-
Machines don’t have the common sense needed to interact with human drivers (R)
-
Machines don’t have emotions so they might be better drivers than humans
-
I wouldn’t mind as long as all cars were autonomous but mixing human drivers and autonomous vehicles will not work
-
It will become easier to drive my own car as more of the cars around me become autonomous
Q16 ‘Please think about your reasons for the choice you made in answering the previous question about using an autonomous (driverless) car and respond to the next set of questions.
Response options: Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree, Don’t know.
-
Most accidents are caused by human error so autonomous vehicles would be safer
-
Autonomous cars could malfunction (R)
-
I would miss the enjoyment of driving (R)
-
I feel that being driven by an autonomous car would be riskier than driving myself
-
I would feel uncomfortable if I wasn’t in control of my car (R)
-
I would take the opportunity to do other things while the autonomous car takes care of the driving
-
It would make no difference to me whether I was in control of the car or not
-
Riding in an autonomous car would be easier than driving myself
-
I don’t know enough about how autonomous cars work
-
I wouldn’t mind as long as the autonomous car did everything and didn’t expect me to take back control sometimes
-
I’d like to be able to forget about the driving sometimes
Technological optimism scale
The technological optimism scale comprises items in Q8. Those items used in the scale are highlighted in italics, and (R) denotes where we reversed the scoring direction for the item, so that higher values in all cases indicate more favourable attitudes towards technology.
Q8 ‘To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?’
Response options: Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Strongly disagree, Don’t know.
-
Science and technology make our way of life change too fast (R)
-
I’m not interested in new technologies (R)
-
We have no option but to trust those governing science
-
Science and technology are making our lives healthier, easier and more comfortable
-
I enjoy making use of the latest technological products and services when I have the opportunity
-
The idea of artificially intelligent robots is scary (R)
-
If I’m in a plane I need to know the pilot is there to take over from the autopilot if necessary (R)
-
New technologies are all about making profits rather than making people’s lives better (R)
-
I am worried about where all this technology is leading (R)
-
We have no option but to adapt to the new technologies that are coming
-
Machines are taking over some of the roles that humans should have (R)
-
The more that we can use technology to control the natural world, the better
-
When my safety is involved I’m happy to rely on technology
Driving sociability scale
The driving sociability scale comprises items in Q10 and Q11. Those items used in the scale are highlighted in italics, and (R) denotes where we reversed the scoring direction for the item, so that higher values in all cases indicate more sociable orientations towards driving.
Q10 ‘Please tell us to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statements about driving in general.’
Response options: Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Strongly disagree, Don’t know.
-
You need to be able to communicate with other road users when you are driving
-
The other motor vehicles all have the same right to be on the road
-
As drivers, we all need to help keep the traffic flowing
-
Being able to make eye contact with other drivers is an important element of driving
-
Each driver has to prioritise their own progress over other people’s (R)
-
As drivers we all need to cooperate with the other drivers on the road
Q11 ‘And now, please give us your opinion on the following statements, by telling us for each one how often it applies to you.
Response options: Always, Usually, Sometimes, Occasionally, Never, Don’t know.
-
I think of other cars as just traffic rather than thinking about the drivers inside them
-
I find that other drivers try to bully me on the road (R)
-
I don’t mind being at the back of a queue of traffic, because we all get there at the end
-
When I am in a queue of traffic that is merging with another I just force my way in (R)
-
When another driver has made way for me I feel it’s my turn to make way for someone else later on
-
If another driver impedes me I will impede another driver later on (R)
-
When queues of traffic are merging drivers should take turns
-
It’s ok for someone to push into a queue if they are in a hurry (R)
-
If it slows me down I won’t help other drivers (R)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 China Science and Technology Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tennant, C. (2021). Exploring Emerging Public Attitudes Towards Autonomous Vehicles. In: Schiele, B., Liu, X., Bauer, M.W. (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5378-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5379-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)