Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Segmentation Disparities in Scientific Experts’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards GMOs in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a unique topic of continuous controversy in the past decade in China and beyond. Although a vast body of literature has been devoted to polarized public opinions about GMOs, there remains a dearth of research exploring the views of scientific experts. The cognition-based dimension of attitudes—to be specific, the relationship between scientific knowledge and attitudes towards GMOs—has attracted extensive scholarly attention, yet no systematic and uniform conclusion can be drawn based on the observations of the lay public. This study attempts to offer a fresh understanding of the experts’ cognition-based attitudes to GMOs by employing a segmentation strategy, through which the knowledge–attitudes association among presumably distinctive expert segments can be observed more clearly. Based on the latest large-scale national survey involving 11,538 valid cases of scientific experts in China, this study verifies the existence of segmentation disparities among Chinese experts regarding their knowledge levels and differentiated attitudes to GMOs, as characterized by their disciplinary fields, institutional affiliations and education levels. This study also contributes to the current academic debate over the relationship between knowledge and attitudes by revealing a relatively constant pattern of a positive knowledge–attitude association partially and substantially mediated by perceived benefit and perceived risk across various segments within science communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CAST: http://english.cast.org.cn/col/col471/index.html.

References

  • Aleksejeva I (2014) EU experts’ attitude towards use of GMO in food and feed and other industries. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 110:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 17(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudrie CE, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH (2014) Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty and regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials. PloS one 9(9):e106365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoldo R, Mays C, Poumadère M, Schneider N, Svendsen C (2016) Great deeds or great risks? Scientists’ social representations of nanotechnology. J Risk Res 19(6):760–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley JC (2018) Audiences for science communication in the United States. Environ Commun 12(8):1005–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley JC, Kramer VL, Priest SH (2008) Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 10(4):549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV (2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(5):546–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli L (2011) Manufactured scientific controversy: science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric Public Affairs 14(2):195–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli L (2013) Controversy over manufactured scientific controversy: a rejoinder to Fuller. Rhetoric Public Affairs 16(4):761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoph IB, Bruhn M, Roosen J (2008) Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany. Appetite 51(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley EA, Scheufele DA, Hu Q (2009) Of risks and regulations: how leading US nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11(7):1573–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Font M, Gil JM, Traill WB (2008) Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 33(2):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui K, Shoemaker SP (2018) Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: a nationwide Chinese consumer study. npj Sci Food 2(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Delshad A, Raymond L (2013) Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Rev Policy Res 30(2):190–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernbach PM, Light N, Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P (2019) Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nat Hum Behav 3(3):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco F, Lackner S, Gonçalves-Sá J (2019) A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: excess confidence explains negative attitudes towards science. arXiv preprint arXiv:11193

  • Goldberg MH, van der Linden S, Ballew MT, Rosenthal SA, Leiserowitz A (2019) The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus. J Appl Soc Psychol 49(3):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther L, Weingart P, Meyer C (2018) ‘Science is everywhere, but no one knows it’: assessing the cultural distance to science of rural South African publics. Environ Commun 12(8):1046–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N, Fischer AR, van der Lans IA, Frewer LJ (2012) Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis. J Nanopart Res 14(5):857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart PS, Nisbet EC (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun Res 39(6):701–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann C, Hübner P, Siegrist M (2018) A risk perception gap? Comparing expert, producer and consumer prioritization of food hazard controls. Food Chem Toxicol 116:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun 33(2):167–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Peng B, Wang X (2017) Scientists’ attitudes toward agricultural GM technology development and GM food in China. China Agric Econ Rev 9(3):369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato-Nitta N, Maeda T, Inagaki Y, Tachikawa M (2019) Expert and public perceptions of gene-edited crops: attitude changes in relation to scientific knowledge. Palgrave Commun 5(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Corley EA, Scheufele DA (2012) Classifying US nano-scientists: of cautious innovators, regulators, and technology optimists. Sci Public Policy 39(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig P, Dalrymple KE, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2012) Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Sci Public Policy 39(6):761–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Boholm Å, Magnus J (2017) Attitudes towards nanomaterials and nanotechnology among Swedish expert stakeholders: risk, benefit and regulation. Gothenburg Res Inst

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Jansson M, Boholm Å (2019) Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 21(3):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Kim S-H (2018) Scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science in South Korea: does knowledge lead to favorable attitudes? Sci Commun 40(2):147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metag J, Schäfer MS (2018) Audience segments in environmental and science communication: recent findings and future perspectives. Environ Commun 12(8):995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielby H, Sandøe P, Lassen J (2013) The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Underst Sci 22(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson ME, Williams DR (2005) Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress. J Environ Psychol 25(4):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter LM, Bissonnette SA, Knight JD, Tanner KD (2017) Investigating novice and expert conceptions of genetically modified organisms. CBE—Life Sci Educ 16(3):ar52

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell MC (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists’ standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. Health Risk Soc 9(2):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose KM, Howell EL, Su LY-F, Xenos MA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2019) Distinguishing scientific knowledge: the impact of different measures of knowledge on genetically modified food attitudes. Public Underst Sci 28(4):449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runge KK, Brossard D, Xenos MA (2018) Protective progressives to distrustful traditionalists: a post hoc segmentation method for science communication. Environ Commun 12(8):1023–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savadori L, Savio S, Nicotra E, Rumiati R, Finucane M, Slovic P (2004) Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Anal Int J 24(5):1289–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MS, Füchslin T, Metag J, Kristiansen S, Rauchfleisch A (2018) The different audiences of science communication: a segmentation analysis of the Swiss population’s perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns. Public Underst Sci 27(7):836–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Hübner P, Hartmann C (2018) Risk prioritization in the food domain using deliberative and survey methods: differences between experts and laypeople. Risk Anal 38(3):504–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis P, Cooper H, Fife-Schaw C (2005) Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public. New Genet Soc 24(1):31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su LY-F, Cacciatore MA, Brossard D, Corley EA, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA (2016) Attitudinal gaps: how experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science. Sci Public Policy 43(2):196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart J, Potter C, Barnett J, Fellenor J, Mumford J, Quine CP (2017) Expert risk perceptions and the social amplification of risk: a case study in invasive tree pests and diseases. Environ Sci Policy 77:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Fischer AR, Marvin HJ, van Trijp HC (2017) Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes towards a new technology: nanotechnology applications for food, water, energy and medicine. J Risk Res 20(2):277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2016) The subtle logics of knowledge conflicts in China’s foreign enterprises. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Liu GL (2015) The effects of consumers’ subjective and objective knowledge on perceptions and attitude towards genetically modified foods: objective knowledge as a determinant. Int J Food Sci Technol 50(5):1198–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Xie X (2015) Effects of knowledge on attitude formation and change toward genetically modified foods. Risk Anal 35(5):790–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financed by China’s State Major Research Projects on Breeding New Varieties of Genetically Modified Organisms under grant number 2016ZX08015002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Jianbin Jin & Xiaoxiao Cheng

  2. National Communication Center for Science and Technology, China Association for Science and Technology, Beijing, China

    Zhaohui Li

Authors
  1. Jianbin Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoxiao Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaohui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianbin Jin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Bernard Schiele

  2. National Academy of Innovation Strategy, Beijing, China

    Xuan Liu

  3. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Martin W. Bauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 China Science and Technology Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jin, J., Cheng, X., Li, Z. (2021). Segmentation Disparities in Scientific Experts’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards GMOs in China. In: Schiele, B., Liu, X., Bauer, M.W. (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation