Abstract
There has arisen a tendency in recent pedagogical research to give high value to darkness. The world is portrayed as harbouring at least large pockets of the unfathomable. The one who would want to comprehend the world is always in the dark. But darkness is also celebrated as an educational virtue: in moving into darkness, one can escape the overbearing light of the world. This imagery of darkness turns Plato’s cave and the whole educational endeavour since the Enlightenment on its head, therefore. There, the pedagogical aim has been precisely that of leading the student from the dark into the light. However, it turns out that, on inspection, each of these pedagogical viewpoints – being in the dark; being in the light – are overly simple. No less that four forms of pedagogical darkness may be discerned: (i) in ontological darkness, one comes to a sense of the intertwinedness and incessant motion of the world and its hidden mysteries; (ii) in epistemological darkness, one becomes sensitised to being unwittingly imprisoned in one’s own cognitive spectacles; (iii) in phenomenological darkness, one recognizes that much of oneself is undisclosed to oneself and so one is in the dark even about one’s own reasoning processes; and (iv) in political or ideological darkness, one forms a sense that the darkness of the world could be other than it is. In some cases, therefore, darkness can be confronted head-on; in other cases, it has to be lived with, and lived-in. In every case, however, the unspeakable can and should be voiced.
Keywords
- Higher education
- Philosophy of education
- Virtue
- Darkness
- Light
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University.
Barnett, R. (2000). Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bengtsen, S., & Barnett, R. (2017a). Realism and education. A philosophical examination of the ‘realness’ of the university. In P. Higgs & Y. Waghid (Eds.), A reader in philosophy of education (pp. 121–137). Cape Town: JUTA and Company.
Bengtsen, S., & Barnett, R. (2017b). Confronting the dark side of higher education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 114–131.
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
Candea, M., Cook, J., Trundle, C., & Yarrow, T. (Eds.). (2015). Detachment: Essays on the limits of relational thinking. Manchester: Manchester University.
Cowden, S., Singh, G., Amsler, S., Canaan, J., & Motta, S. (2013). Acts of knowing: Critical pedagogy in, against and beyond the university. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Dall’Alba, G., & Bengtsen, S. (2019). Re-imagining active learning: Delving into darkness. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1477–1489.
Gadamer, H-G. (2018/1992) ‘The idea of the university, yesterday, today, tomorrow’, in M. A. Peters and R. Barnett (Eds.) The idea of the university: Volume 1 A Reader. New York: Peter Lang.
Gellner, E. (1969). Thought and change. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Habermas, J. (1978). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.
Harman, G. (2005). Guerilla metaphysics. Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago & La Salle: Open Court.
Herbrachter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
Kant, I. (1982/1929). Critique of pure reason. Trans. N. K. Smith. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Leavis, F. R. (1969). English literature in our time and the university. London: Chatto and Windus.
Lysgaard, J. A., & Bengtsson, S. (2020). Dark pedagogy – Speculative realism and environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1739230.
Lysgaard, J. A., Bengtsson, S., & Laugesen, H.-L. (2019). Dark pedagogy: Education, horror and the Anthropocene. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
MacIntyre, A. (2011). God, philosophy, universities: A selective history of the Catholic philosophical tradition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Meillassoux, Q. (2014). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota.
Morton, T. (2018). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University.
Nail, T. (2019). Being and motion. Oxford: Oxford University.
Nixon, J. (2015). Hannah Arendt and the politics of friendship. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Peters, M. A. (2020). The Armageddon Club: Education for the future of humanity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(8), 816–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1650023.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Singh, S., & Bhaskar, R. (2020). In M. Hartwig (Ed.), Reality and its depths: A conversation. Singapore: Springer.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.
Wittgenstein, L. (1978/1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L (2003/1969) On certainty. Oxford Blackwell.
Zizek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent Centre of Political Ontology. London and New York: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnett, R., Bengtsen, S.S.E. (2021). Into or Out of the Light? Four Shades of Pedagogical Darkness. In: Mahon, Á. (eds) The Promise of the University. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 10. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5277-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5277-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5276-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5277-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)