Abstract
Tooley (1972) sets an important question for himself:
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In my subjective tastes, which I share with Tooley.
- 2.
The position of the former aligns more with libertarianism in economic issues; with the latter on personal liberties. Neither, very much, on the third leg of political economy, foreign policy.
- 3.
Ahem, excuse me while I sprain my elbow patting myself on the back
References
Block, Walter E. 2011. Terri Schiavo: A Libertarian Analysis. Journal of Libertarian Studies 22: 527–536.
Hume, David. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4705; http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=342&Itemid=27
Tooley, Michael. 1972. Abortion and Infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1): 37–65. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PPP504/Michael%20Tooley%2C%20Abortion%20and%20infanticide.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Block, W.E. (2021). Tooley on Abortion: A Rejoinder. In: Evictionism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5013-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5014-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)