Skip to main content

Endometrial Cell Sampling Procedure to Obtain Cytologic Specimens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Yokohama System for Reporting Endometrial Cytology

Abstract

Chapter 4 includes the important contents about the sampling procedure of endometrial cytology for gynaecologists. The indications for the use of directly sampled endometrial cytology is extremely important. The techniques of endometrial sampling have improved over time. Techniques of endometrial sampling and processing are very simple and easy. The gynaecologists need to know the benefits and the harm of directly sampled endometrial cytology. The technique to directly obtain endometrial cytology samples has three major advantages for patients and gynaecologists. One is that the lower procedure-associated pain in endometrial cytology compared to endometrial biopsy reduces the levels of stress for patients and gynaecologists. The second advantage is that directly sampled endometrial cytology using a brush is less invasive towards the endometrial mucosa than endometrial histology using curettage. The third advantage is that the technique is extremely simple, and the time to obtain endometrial cells is very short.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 03 January 2022

    Chapter 4 in: Y. Hirai, F. Fulciniti (eds.), The Yokohama System for Reporting Endometrial

References

  1. Wild CP, Weiderpass E, Stewart BW, editors. World Cancer report cancer research for cancer prevention. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization; 2020. p. 403–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berek JS. Berek & Novak’s gynecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2012. p. 1254–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson DG, Eaton CJ, Galinkin LJ, et al. The cytologic diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125:376–83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fujihara A, Norimatsu Y, Kobayashi TK, et al. Direct intrauterine sampling with Uterobrush: cell preparation by the “flicked” method. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:486–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kurokawa T, Yoshida Y, Yakihara A, et al. Liquid-based endometrial cytology by preservative fluid. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol. 2005;44:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yanoh K, Norimatsu Y, Hirai Y, et al. New diagnostic reporting format for endometrial cytology based on cytoarchitectural criteria. Cytopathology. 2009;20:388–94. (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shinagawa A, Kurokawa T, Yamamoto M, et al. Evaluation of the benefit and use of the new terminology in endometrial cytology reporting system. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46:314–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Norimatsu Y, Yanoh K, Hirai Y, et al. A diagnostic approach to endometrial cytology by means of liquid-based preparations. Acta Cytol. 2020;64:195–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawaguchi R, et al. Guideline for gynecological practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2020 edition. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2020;47:54–7. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutton JD, Morse AR, Anderson MC, et al. Endometrial assessment with Isaacs cell sampler. Br Med J. 1978;1:947–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuramoto H, Jobo T, Morisawa T, Kato Y, Hata K, Ono E, Imai T. Endometrial aspiration cytology clinic. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol. 1982;21:527–34. (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jimenez-Ayala M, Jimenez-Ayala PB. Endometrial adenocarcinoma prevention and early diagnosis. In: Orell SR, editor. Monographs in clinical cytology. Basel: Karger AG; 2008. pp.13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yanoh K, Norimatsu Y, Munakata S, et al. Evaluation of endometrial cytology prepared with the Becton Dickinson SurePath™ method: a pilot study by the Osaki Study Group. Acta Cytol. 2014;58:153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuji Kurokawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kurokawa, T., Onuma, T., Shinagawa, A., Yoshida, Y. (2022). Endometrial Cell Sampling Procedure to Obtain Cytologic Specimens. In: Hirai, Y., Fulciniti, F. (eds) The Yokohama System for Reporting Endometrial Cytology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5011-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5011-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5010-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5011-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics