Abstract
Science, technology, and innovation, for short STI, have been recognized as key enablers in achieving socio-economic transformation and sustainable development. In spite of its cross-cutting nature and ambiguity, growing recognition of the importance of STI has resulted in diverse policy initiatives in development cooperation. This chapter discusses South Korea’s official development assistance (ODA) policy with a focus on STI. It first provides a conceptual overview of STI and development and examines how STI has been recognized in the international development cooperation. Building on this discussion, this study investigates how STI emerged in Korea’s ODA policy and examines opportunities and challenges in current policy. In spite of potential and recognition of the importance of STI in ODA, there is still a lack of clear understanding and integrated strategies in STI-ODA in Korea. Building on the lessons from the case, implications for development policy include: improving policy integration and interlinkages between ODA and STI policies; developing national STI roadmaps and measurement framework; adopting STI for the localized applications that meet the country’s development priorities; understanding STI as socio-technical systems; and aligning STI strategies with international guidelines and local needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avgerou, C. (2003). The link between ICT and economic growth in the discourse of development. In K. Mikko, M. Ramiro, & P. Angeliki (Eds.), Organizational information systems in the context of globalization (pp. 373–386). Springer.
Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and development. Information technologies & international development, 6, 1–18.
Avgerou, C., & Walsham, G. (Eds.). (2000). Information technology in context: Implementing systems in the developing world. Ashgate.
Baark, E., & Heeks, R. (1999). Donor-funded information technology transfer projects: Evaluating the life-cycle approach in four Chinese science and technology projects. Information Technology for Development, 8(4), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.1999.9525309
Chang, Y. S. (2012). Packaged science and technology ODA models as new-science and technology diplomacy strategies. STEPI Insight, 86, 1–29.
Correa, C. (1994). Trends in technology transfer implications for developing countries. Science and Public Policy, 21(6), 369–380.
Ericsson, F., & Mealy, S. (2019). Connecting official development assistance and science technology and innovation for inclusive development: Measurement challenges from a development assistance committee perspective.
Forsyth, T. (2007). Promoting the “development dividend” of climate technology transfer: Can cross-sector partnerships help? World Development, 35(10), 1684–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.001
Fukuda-parr, S., & Muchhala, B. (2019). The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations. World Development, 126(November), 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104706
Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
Gamser, M. S. (1988). Innovation, technical assistance, and development: The importance of technology users. World Development, 16(6), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(88)90177-5
Gelb, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2020). Can we use digital technology to cushion the pandemic’s Blow—And in the longer run, deliver on the SDGs? Center For Global Development.
Gibson, C. C., Hoffman, B. D., & Jablonski, R. S. (2015). Did aid promote democracy in Africa? The role of technical assistance in Africa’s transitions. World Development, 68, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.009
Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00041-8
Godfrey, M., Sophal, C., Kato, T., Vou Piseth, L., Dorina, P., Saravy, T., & Sovannarith, S. (2002). Technical assistance and capacity development in an aid-dependent economy: The experience of Cambodia. World Development, 30(3), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00121-8
Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: Teh role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87–111.
Hahm, S. D., Plein, L. C., & Florida, R. (1994). The politics of international technology transfer: Lessons from the Korean experience. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01470.x
Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.192
Heo, K., Lee, D., Seo, Y., & Choi, H. (2020). Searching for digital technologies in containment and mitigation strategies: Experience from South Korea Covid-19. Annals of Global Health, 86(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/AOGH.2993
IATT. (2020). Guidebook for the preparation of science, technology and innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps.
IISD. (2020). Virtual world bank, IMF meetings recognize COVID-19’s impact on development | News | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD.
Juma, C., Fang, K., Honca, D., Perez, J. H., Konde, V., Lee, S. H., Arenas, J., Ivinson, A., Robinson, H., & Singh, S. (2005). Global governance of technology: Meeting the needs of developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 629. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2001.002982
Kang, H. J., & Yim, D. S. (2014). Current status and policy direction of Science and Technology, & ICT ODA. STEPI Insight, 145, 1–37.
Kapur, D. (2001). Diasporas and technology transfer. Journal of Human Development, 2(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880120067284
Karakosta, C., Doukas, H., & Psarras, J. (2010). Technology transfer through climate change: Setting a sustainable energy pattern. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(6), 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.001
Kim, W., Lee, J. W., Yim, D. S., Kim, K. K., Sun, I., Gang, H. J., Kim, E., Kwon, S., Jeon, B. W., & Lee, S. (2019). Analysis and strategies on science and technology ODA.
KISDI. (2018). ICT ODA evaluation and monitoring.
Korea Institue for International Economic Policy. (2015). Research on establishing korean science and technology ODA roadmap.
Korea International Cooperation Agency. (2019). 2019 KOICA creative technology solutions brochure.
Korea International Cooperation Agency. (2021). 2021 KOICA CTS programme guide book.
Lee, D. Y., & Yim, C. Y. (2016). Case study on Korea International Cooperation Agency Creative Technology Solution (KOICA CTS) Programme: Next-generation mobile malaria diagnosis kit. Journal of International Development Cooperation, 4, 41–52.
Lee, J. hyop. (2011). Korea science, technology and innovation ODA strategies for global platform leadership. Science & Technology Policy, 185, 24–36.
Lee, J. hyop, Dong, G., Yang, F., Sun, J., & Maliphol, S. (2012). Korean Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) ODA Strategies.
Lee, W. S., Hwang, J. T., & Kim, W. J. (2010). A framework to analyse and enhance S&T ODA for sustainable development in three ASEAN countries: Cambodia, Vietnam, and Philippines.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). The national strategy of science, technology, and education ODA for enhancing developing countries’ capacity and supporting sustainable development.
Ministry of Land and Infrastructure. (2020, March 25). Fast and precise detection of COVID-19 infected patient travel history with smart city technology. Ministry of Land and Infrastructure Press Release.
Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019). Korean government announced diplomatic strategies on science and technology for the innovative & inclusive state. Republic of Korea Policy Briefing.
Ministry of Science and ICT. (2020). How we fought COVID-19: Perspective from science & ICT. Sejong.
Miedzinski, M., Mcdowall, W., Fahnestock, J., Muller, G., & Lopez, F. J. D. (2019, November). Science, technology and innovation policy roadmaps for the SDGs a guide for design and implementation.
Moon, M. J. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 with agility, transparency, and participation: Wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13214
Murphy, K., Kirkman, G. A., Seres, S., & Haites, E. (2015). Technology transfer in the CDM: An updated analysis. Climate Policy, 15(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.812719
Nam, D. W. (1997). Korea’s economic growth in a changing world. Samsung Economic Research Institute.
Nelson, R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study. Oxford University Press.
Oda, H. (1991). Law and politics of West-East technology transfer (H. Oda, Ed.). Graham & Trotman. Martinus Nijhoff.
OECD. (1996). The Knowledge-based economy.
OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). Luxembourg: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
Park, K. R. (2020). Data revolution: A critical view from the perspective of development cooperation. International Development and Cooperation Review, 12(2), 1–20.
Park, K. R., Sahay, S., Braa, J., & Amarakoon, P. (2021). Digital resilience for what? Case study of South Korea. In International Conference on Information and Digital Technology for Development: ICT4D. Springer.
Park, Y. J., Cho, S. Y., Lee, J., Lee, I., Park, W. H., Jeong, S., Kim, S., Lee, S., Kim, J., & Park, O. (2020). Development and utilization of a rapid and accurate epidemic investigation support system for Covid-19. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 11(3), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.3.06
Reddy, N. M., & Zhao, L. (1990). International technology transfer: A review. Research Policy, 19(4), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90015-X
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3210
Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
Sahay, S., Sein, M., & Urquhart, C. (2017). Flipping the context: ICT4D, the next grand challenge for IS research and practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(12).
Schopf, J. C. (2019). Room for improvement: Why Korea’s leading ICT ODA program has failed to combat corruption. Telecommunications Policy, 43(6), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.01.001
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001
Soete, L. (2019). Science, technology and innovation studies at a crossroad: SPRU as case study. Research Policy, 48(4), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.029
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Tarnoff, C. (2018). The Marshall plan: Design, accomplishments, and significance.
United Nations. (2018). Technology and the UN 2030 agenda: United Nations Technology facilitation mechanism.
United Nations. (2015). Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the third international conference on financing for development (Addis Ababa Action Agenda). A/RES/69/313.
Walsh, P. P., Murphy, E., & Horan, D. (2020). The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154(February 2019), 119957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957
Wilkins, G. (2002). Technology transfer for renewable energy: Overcoming barriers in developing countries. Earthscan, London.
Wilson, G. (2007). Knowledge, innovation and re-inventing technical assistance for development. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 183–199.
Wittemyer, R., Bailur, S., Anand, N., Park, K. R., & Gigler, S. (2014). New routes to governance: A review of cases in participation, transparency, and accountability. In Closing the feedback loop: Can technology bridge the accountability gap? World Bank.
World Bank. (2011). Innovation in disaster risk financing for developing countries: Public and private contributions. The World Bank.
World Bank/IMF Development Committee. (2020). World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings 2020: Development Committee Communiqué.
Yim, D. S. (2015). Korea science, technology and innovation ODA strategies and action plans. Journal of International Development Cooperation, 2015(3), 21–37.
Yoo, J. S., & Yoo, S. H. (2019). Diagnosis on Korea ICT ODA: Analysis on recent 5 Years of comprehensive implementation plan on international development cooperation (by fixed amount). Information and Communications Broadcasting Policy, 31(5), 59–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, K.R. (2022). Science, Technology, and Innovation in Sustainable Development Cooperation: Theories and Practices in South Korea. In: Kwon, Hj., Yamagata, T., Kim, E., Kondoh, H. (eds) International Development Cooperation of Japan and South Korea. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4601-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4601-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4600-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4601-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)