Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment to Evaluate the Future Energy Crops for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)

Abstract

Currently, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) methodology is widely used to determine possible environmental impacts in the sustainable fuels and energy sector. It is a deep-rooted tool to afford data-driven investigation of environmental impact assessment. Among the energy crops, specifically, the perennial grasses and trees might contribute significantly to the mitigation of global environmental problems in energy safety and climate change, provided if high yields can be attained. The nonfood low-cost perennial energy crops like Salix, Miscanthus, switchgrass, and giant cane grass are considered commercially important due to their high-yielding capacity, can grow in marginal land type, minimum requirement of input needs, and more ground cover. These crops would address several environmental issues such as involvement in the reduction of greenhouse gases and energy either for bioenergy or biomaterials and encouraging social benefits specifically in rural areas. But its economical utilization is compromised since their cost of production is influenced by yields. The present chapter discusses the OPTIMA project which is dedicated to the farming of perennial crops such as giant reed (A. donax L.), miscanthus (Miscanthus × Giganteus), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in minimal nutritional soils in the Mediterranean region. This chapter also briefly describes the sustainability assessment of the perennial energy crop cultivation with reference to economic, environmental, and socioeconomic benefits and elucidates the validation on cultivation and utilization of perennial grasses to predict the advantages toward sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IEA India Energy Policy Review. 2020

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar CR, Majid MA (2020) Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energ Sustain Soc 10:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S Energy Information Administration. Country Analysis Executive Summary: India. Sep 30, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sumfleth B, Majer S, Thran D (2020) Recent developments in low iLUC policies and certification in the EU biobased economy. Sustainability 12:2–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guinee JB, Reijung R (1995) A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:917–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klopffer W (2006) The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCA. Int J LCA 11 (3), May edition

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suski P, Speck M, Liedtke C (2021) Promoting sustainable consumption with LCA - A social practice based perspective. J Clean Prod 283:125234

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giesen CVD, Cucurachi S, Guinee J, Kramer GJ, Tukker A (2020) A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. J Clean Prod 259:120904

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beemsterboer S, Baumann H, Wallbaum H (2020) Ways to get work done: a review and systematization of simplification practices in the LCA literature. Int J LCA 25:2154–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moni SM, Mahmud R, High K, Dale MC (2019) Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review. J Ind Ecol 24:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yadav P, Priyanka P, Kumar D, Yadav, Yadav K (2009) bioenergy crops: recent advances and future outlook. In Rastegari AA (eds), Prospects of renewable bioprocessing in future energy systems. Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies 10:2019

    Google Scholar 

  12. McBride W, Greene C (2009) The profitability of organic soybean production. Renew Agric Food Syst 24:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scordia D, Scalici G, Brown JC, Robson P, Patane C, Cosentino SL (2020) Wild Miscanthus germplasm in a drought-affected area: physiology and agronomy appraisals. Agronomy 10:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fradj BS, Borzecka RM, Matyka M (2020) Miscanthus in the European bio-economy: a network analysis. Ind Crops Prod 148:112281.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Schafer G, Dupla J, Kuhn NJ (2018) Bioenergy crop induced changes in soil properties: A case study on Miscanthus fields in the Upper Rhine Region. PloS One 13:e0200901

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scordia D, Zanetti F, Varga SS, Alexopoulou E, Cavallaro V, Monti A, Copani V, Cosentino SL (2015) New insights into the propagation methods of switchgrass. Miscanthus Giant Reed Bioenergy Res 8:1480–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mariscal MJ, Orgaz F, Villalobos FJ (2000) Radiation-use efficiency and dry matter partitioning of a young olive (Olea europaea) orchard. Tree Physiol 20:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pradhan S, Sehgal VK, Bandyopadhya KK, Panigrahi P, Parihar CM, Jat SL (2018) Radiation interception, extinction coefficient and use efficiency of wheat crop at various irrigation and nitrogen levels in a semi-arid location. Ind J plant physiol 23:416–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J, Jiang H, Song X, Jin X, Zhang X (2018) The responses of plant leaf CO2/H2O exchange and water use efficiency to drought: a meta-analysis. Sustainability 10:2–13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewandowski SU (2006) Nitrogen, energy and land use efficiencies of Miscanthus, reed canary grass and triticale as determined by the boundary line approach. Agric Ecosys Environ 112:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith R, Slater F (2010) The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer applications to Miscanthus × giganteus, Arundo donax and Phalaris arundinacea, when grown as energy crops in Wales, UK. GCB Bioenergy 2:169–179

    Google Scholar 

  22. Copani V, Cosentino SL, Testa G, Scordia D (2013) Agamic propagation of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ital J Agron 8:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  23. ISO, 2006a. ISO 14040:2006–Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO, 2006b. ISO 14044:2006–Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt WP, Sullivan JL (2002) Weighting in life cycle assessments in a global context. Int J LCA 7:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herron SA, Rubin MJ, Ciotir C, Crews TE, Van Tassel DL, Miller AJ (2020) Comparative analysis of early life stage traits in annual and perennial Phaseolus crops and their wild relatives. Front Plant Sci 11:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulczycka J, Smol M (2016) Environmentally friendly pathways for the evaluation of investment projects using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Clean Techn Environ Policy 18:829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cilluffo A, Ruiz, NG (2019) World’s population is projected to nearly stop growing by the end of the century. UN’s “World Population Prospects 2019”

    Google Scholar 

  30. Finnan JM, Styles D (2013) Hemp: A more sustainable annual energy crop for climate and energy policy. Energy Policy 58:152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Burke MJ, Gusta LV, Quamme HA, Weiser CJ, Li PH (1976) Freezing and injury in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 27:507–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Winkler JA, Andresen JA, Guentchev G, Kriegel RD (2002) Possible impacts of projected temperature change on commercial fruit production in the Great Lakes region. J Great Lakes Res 28:608–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Agostini F, Gregory AS, Richter GM (2015) Carbon sequestration by perennial energy crops: is the jury still out? Bioenergy Res 8:1057–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Virgilio ND, Facini O, Nocentini A, Nardino M, Rossi F, Monti A (2019) Four-year measurement of net ecosystem gas exchange of switchgrass in a Mediterranean climate after long-term arable land use. GCB Bioenergy 11:466–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arora K, Sharma S, Monti A (2016) Bio-remediation of Pb and Cd polluted soils by switchgrass: a case study in India. Int J Phytoremediation 18:704–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Papazoglou EG (2007) Arundo donax L. Stress tolerance under irrigation with heavy metal aqueous solutions. Desalination 211:304–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Keller H, Rettenmaier N, Reinhardt GA (2015) Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment—a practical approach applied to bio-refineries. Appl Energy 154:1072–1081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, 603103, India

    R. Anitha

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, 603110, India

    R. Subashini & P. Senthil Kumar

  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, 603110, India

    P. Senthil Kumar

Authors
  1. R. Anitha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Subashini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Senthil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Senthil Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Head of Sustainability, SgT Group and API, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anitha, R., Subashini, R., Kumar, P.S. (2021). Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment to Evaluate the Future Energy Crops for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts. In: Muthu, S.S. (eds) Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4562-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation