Skip to main content

Comparison of Thermal and Emission Performance of Canister Based Methanol Cookstove with Kerosene Wick Cookstove

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations in Energy, Power and Thermal Engineering

Abstract

A comparative performance study in terms of thermal efficiency and emissions characteristics (CO and NOx) of canister based methanol cookstove and kerosene wick cookstove are presented in this work. Experimental results showed that the methanol cookstove yielded a maximum efficiency of 63.2%, while in the case of the kerosene wick cookstove, it was only 56.8%. The methanol cookstove showed clean burning as the emissions of CO and NOx were found to be around 154 ppm and 0.3 ppm, respectively, whereas the respective values for kerosene wick cookstove were 286 ppm and 0.9 ppm, respectively. Compared to kerosene wick cookstove, cleaner combustion in methanol cookstove leads to a maximum percentage improvement in combustion efficiency by 4.7%. Comparative results of thermal and emission performances of studied cookstoves show that the canister based methanol cookstove is a competent alternative to kerosene wick cookstoves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APL:

Assam Petrochemicals Limited

\(\eta_{{{\text{comb}}}}\) :

Combustion efficiency, %

\(T_{2}\) :

Final temperature of water, °C

\(T_{1}\) :

Initial temperature of water, °C

LPG:

Liquified Petroleum Gas

\({\text{LCV}}_{{{\text{fuel}}}}\) :

Lower calorific value of fuel, kJ/kg

\(m_{{{\text{fuel}}}}\) :

Mass of fuel, kg

M :

Mass of pan, kg

m :

Mass of water, kg

\(C_{{\text{p}}}\) :

Specific heat of pan, kJ/kg k

\(C_{{\text{w}}}\) :

Specific heat of water, kJ/kg k

\(\eta_{{{\text{th}}}}\) :

Thermal efficiency, %

WBT:

Water Boiling Test

References

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA), SDG7: Data and projections, Access to clean cooking, 2020 https://www.iea.org/reports/sdg7-data-and-projections/access-to-clean-cooking

  2. Patnaik S, Tripathi S, Jain A (2019) A roadmap for access to clean cooking energy in India. Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaisnav A (2020) Demand for grants 2020–21 analysis report. Petroleum and Natural Gas, PRS Legislative Research

    Google Scholar 

  4. Methanol Economy, Government of India (2018) https://niti.gov.in/methanol-economy

  5. Marchionna M, Patrini R, Sanfilippo D, Migliavacca G (2008) Fundamental investigations on di-methyl ether (DME) as LPG substitute or make-up for domestic uses. Fuel Process Technol 89:1255–1261

    Google Scholar 

  6. Panigrahy S, Mishra SC (2017) Effect of dimethyl ether as an additive to liquefied petroleum gas flame in SiC–Al2O3-based porous inert burner. Energ Fuel 31:12721–12740

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anggarani R, Wibowo CS, Rulianto D (2014) Application of dimethyl ether as LPG substitution for household stove. Energy Procedia 47:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benka-Coker ML, Tadele W, Milano A, Getaneh D, Stokes H (2018) A case study of the ethanol clean cook stove intervention and potential scale-up in Ethiopia. Energy Sustain Dev 46:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ozier A, Charron D, Chung S, Sarma V, Dutta A, Jagoe K, Obueh J, Stokes H, Munangagwa CL, Johnson M, Olopade CO (2018) Building a consumer market for ethanol-methanol cooking fuel in Lagos. Nigeria. Energy Sustain Dev. 46:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mudombi S, Nyambane A, Von Maltitz GP, Gasparatos A, Johnson FX, Chenene ML, Attanassov B (2018) User perceptions about the adoption and use of ethanol fuel and cookstoves in Maputo. Mozambique. Energy Sustain Dev. 44:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jetter, J.J., Ebersviller, S., Williams, C., Faircloth, J.: Clean Cook Model A1 Stove with Alcohol Fuel - Air Pollutant Emissions and Fuel Efficiency. Test report, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masekameni MD, Makonese T, Annegarn HJ (2015) A comparison of emissions and thermal efficiency of three improved liquid fuel stoves. In: International conference on the domestic use of energy (DUE) IEEE, pp 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bureau of Indian Standard, Specification for gravity-fed kerosene wick cookstove, (second revision): IS 11760:1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Devi S, Sahoo N, Muthukumar P (2019) Combustion of biogas in porous radiant burner: low emission combustion. Energy Procedia 158:1116–1121

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sinha GS, Muthukumar P (2019) Study of effects of various parameter on thermal efficiency of porous burner with kerosene pressure stove. J Phys: Conf Ser 1240

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaushik LK, Muthukumar P (2019) Performance assessment of a porous radiant cook stove fueled with blend of waste vegetable oil (WVO) and kerosene. Energy Procedia 158:2391–2396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Assam Petrochemicals Limited (APL) by providing methanol and canister based methanol cookstoves for testing and comparison.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Muthukumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maurya, P., Arun Kumar, M., Kaushik, L.K., Muthukumar, P., Anandalakshmi, R. (2022). Comparison of Thermal and Emission Performance of Canister Based Methanol Cookstove with Kerosene Wick Cookstove. In: Palanisamy, M., Natarajan, S.K., Jayaraj, S., Sivalingam, M. (eds) Innovations in Energy, Power and Thermal Engineering . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4489-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4489-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4488-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4489-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics