Skip to main content

A Laboratory Investigation on the Advancement of Railway Ballast Behavior Using Artificial Inclusions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICSBE 2020

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 174))

Abstract

Ballasted rail tracks are the most popular and conventional rail track foundation system primarily consists of ballast as a major portion by weight and volume. Ballast is a highly angular, coarser material with high bearing capacity, shear strength, and non-water absorbent, which is obtained by crushing rocks. The ballast layer absorbs and widely distributes the moving train loads from sleepers to the ground. With time, the ballast is deteriorated because of frequent cyclic and impact loads from train movements, which ended up with high-cost maintenance. Artificial inclusions are renowned remedial action to the above-mentioned issue. In this laboratory-based study, the effect of rubber pads and geogrids on the shear and deterioration behavior of ballast was evaluated by conducting large-scale direct shear tests under 30, 60, and 90 kPa normal loads with a shearing rate of 4 mm/min. Based on the experimental results, a combination of shock mats and geogrid is suggested which enhanced the stress, dilation, and deterioration behavior of railway ballast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biabani MM, Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S (2016) Assessment of interface shear behaviour of sub-ballast with geosynthetics by large-scale direct shear test. Procedia Eng 143:1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chawla S, Banerjee L, Dash SK (2018) Three dimensional finite element analyses of geocell reinforced railway tracks. In: Indian geotechnical conference, Bengaluru, India, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen C, McDowell GR, Thom N (2013) A study of geogrid-reinforced ballast using laboratory pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Geomech Geoeng 8(4):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Esmaeili M, Zakeri JA, Babaei M (2017) Laboratory and field investigation of the effect of geogrid-reinforced ballast on railway track lateral resistance. Geotext Geomembr 45(2):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fattah MY, Mahmood MR, Aswad MF (2017) Experimental and numerical behavior of railway track over geogrid reinforced ballast underlain by soft clay. In: International Congress and Exhibition Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang H, Tutumluer E, Dombrow W (2009) Laboratory characterization of fouled railroad ballast behavior. Transp Res Rec 2117(1):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussaini SKK, Indraratna B, Vinod J (2018) A Critical review of the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced railroad ballast. Geotech Eng 49(4):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  8. Indraratna B, Lackenby J, Christie D (2005) Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading. Geotech Inst Civil Eng 55(4):325–328

    Google Scholar 

  9. Indraratna B, Navaratnarajah SK, Nimbalkar S, Rujikiatkamjiorn C (2014) Use of shock mats for enhanced stability of railroad track foundation. Austr Geomech J 49(4):101–110

    Google Scholar 

  10. Indraratna B, Navaratnarajah SK, Nimbalkar S, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Neville T (2015) Performance monitoring: case studies of tracks stabilised by geosynthetic grids and prefabricated vertical drains. In: Field measurements in geomechanics, Sydney, pp 233–246

    Google Scholar 

  11. Indraratna B, Qi Y, Tawk M, Heitor A, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Navaratnarajah SK (2020) Advances in ground improvement using waste materials for transportation infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Ground Improvement, pp 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jayasuriya C, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Navaratnarajah SK (2020) Application of elastic inclusions to improve the performance of ballasted track. In: Geo-Congress 2020: Engineering, Monitoring, and Management of Geotechnical Infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers Reston, VA, pp 364–373

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang Y, Nimbalkar SS (2019) Finite element modelling of ballasted rail track capturing effects of geosynthetic inclusions. Front Built Environ 5:69(1–11)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leshchinsky BA (2011) Enhancing ballast performance using geocell confinement. In: Geo-frontiers 2011: advances in geotechnical engineering, pp 4693–4702

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mishra A, Goyal S, Muttharam M, Nanthakumar S (2018) Study on the performance of railway ballasted track reinforced with geogrid. Indian J Sci Technol 11(23):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Navaratnarajah S, Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S (2015) Performance of rail ballast stabilized with resilient rubber pads under cyclic and impact loading. In: International conference on geotechnical engineering, Colombo, pp 617–620

    Google Scholar 

  17. Navaratnarajah SK (2017) Application of rubber inclusions to enhance the stability of ballasted rail track under cyclic loading. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wollongong. Available at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/51

  18. Navaratnarajah SK (2019) Resilient element attached under the concrete sleepers to improve the rail track performances. J Eastern Asia Soc Transport Stud 13:2506–2520

    Google Scholar 

  19. Navaratnarajah SK, Gunawardhana KRCM, Gunawardhana MASP (2020) Influence of type of interfaces on railway ballast behavior. In: ICSECM 2019, Lecture notes in civil engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–251

    Google Scholar 

  20. Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B (2017) Use of rubber mats to improve the deformation and degradation behavior of rail ballast under cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(6):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B (2018) Application of under sleeper pads to enhance the sleeper-ballast interface behaviours. In: Indian geotechnical conference, Bengaluru, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B (2020) Stabilisation of stiffer rail track substructure using artificial inclusion. Indian Geotech J 50(2):196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B, Ngo NT (2018) Influence of under sleeper pads on ballast behavior under cyclic loading: experimental and numerical studies. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144(9):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ngo NT, Indraratna B, Bessa Ferreira F, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2018) Improved performance of geosynthetics enhanced ballast: laboratory and numerical studies. Proc Inst Civil Eng Ground Improve 171(4):202–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Q (2020) Numerical simulation of the dynamic response of ballasted track overlying a tire-reinforced capping layer. Front Built Environ 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sweta K, Hussaini SKK (2018) Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Geotext Geomembr 46(3):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweta K, Hussaini SKK (2019) Behavior evaluation of geogrid-reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition. Geotext Geomembr 47(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tennakoon N, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Nimbalkar S (2012) Assessment of ballast fouling and its implications on track drainage. In: 11th Australia–New Zealand conference on geomechanics: ground engineering in a changing world, pp 421–426

    Google Scholar 

  29. Venuja S, Navaratnarajah SK, Bandara CS, Jayasinghe JASC (2020) Review on geosynthetic inclusions for the enhancement of ballasted rail tracks. In: ICSECM 2019, Lecture notes in civil engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 459–468

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is supported by Accelerating Higher Education Expansion and Development (AHEAD) Operation of the Ministry of Higher Education funded by the World Bank (Grant No: AHEAD/RA3/DOR/STEM/No. 63) and the University of Peradeniya Research Grant (Grant No: URG-2017-29-E) are acknowledged with the appreciation by the Authors. The authors especially appreciate the staff from Nawalapitiya for their support in the material collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Venuja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Venuja, S., Navaratnarajah, S.K., Wickramasinghe, T.H.V.P., Wanigasekara, D.S.A. (2022). A Laboratory Investigation on the Advancement of Railway Ballast Behavior Using Artificial Inclusions. In: Dissanayake, R., Mendis, P., Weerasekera, K., De Silva, S., Fernando, S. (eds) ICSBE 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 174. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4412-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4412-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4411-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4412-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics