Skip to main content

Study on Similarity Measures in Group Decision-Making Based on Signless Laplacian Energy of an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graph

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Software Architecture and Computational Systems

Abstract

In sight of intuitionistic fuzzy inclination relations (IFIR), we study group decision-making (GDM) problems. We propose another way to deal with assess the relative notoriety weights of specialists by registering the questionable proof of intuitionistic fuzzy inclination relations and the normal similitude level of one individual intuitionistic inclination connection to the others. This new approach takes both objective and subjective evidence of specialists into consideration. Then, we assimilate the weights of authorities into the precise intuitionistic fuzzy inclination relations and progress a relative similarity method to originate the significances of substitutes and better of the substitutes. The balance investigation with extra techniques by two numerical examples shows the sober mindedness and supportiveness of the anticipated strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. De SK, Biswas R, Roy AR (2001) An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets and Syst 117(2):209–213

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov K, Pasi G, Yager RR (2008) Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making. Int J Sys Sci 36:859–868

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gong ZW, Li LS, et al (2010) On additive consistent properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy predilection relation. Int J Evidence Tech Decision Mak 9(6):1009–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu ZS (2007) On similarity measures of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to pattern recognitions. J Southeast Univ 23(1):139–143 (in English)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Vlochos IK, Sergiadis GD (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy evidence—applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition Lett 28:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Analysis of consensus under intuitionistic fuzzy predilections. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Fuzzy Logic and Technology, September 5–7, De Montfort Univ. Leicester, UK, pp 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Analysis of agreement in a group of authorities via distances between intuitionistic fuzzy predilections. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference IPMU 2002, Annecy, France, 2002, pp 1859–1865

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2005) A new concept of a similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making. In: V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, S. Miyamoto (Eds) Modelling decision for artificial intelligence, LNAI 3558,pp 272–282. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  10. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control and Cybernetics 31, 1037–1053

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic predilection relations and their application in group decision making. Evidence Sciences 177(4):2363–2379

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Parvathi R, Karumbigai M G, Intutionistic fuzzy graphs, computational intelligence. Theory and Appl 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharbaf SR, Fayazi F (2014) Laplacian Energy of a fuzzy graph. Iranian J Mathematical Chem 5(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu ZS (2008) An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic sets. Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems 16(4):529–555

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy predilection relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optimizat Decision Making 8(2):123–129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gong ZW, Li LS, Zhou FX, Yao TX (2009) Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy predilection relations. Computers and Industrial Eng 57(2009):1187–1193

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gutman I, Zhou B (2006) Laplacian Energy of a Graph. Linear Algebra Appl 414(1):29–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ramesh, O., Basha, S.S., Das, R. (2021). Study on Similarity Measures in Group Decision-Making Based on Signless Laplacian Energy of an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graph. In: Mandal, J.K., Mukhopadhyay, S., Unal, A., Sen, S.K. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Software Architecture and Computational Systems. Studies in Autonomic, Data-driven and Industrial Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4301-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4301-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4300-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4301-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics