Skip to main content

Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment

Abstract

Asking second language (L2) learners to repeat the same or slightly altered tasks is a common practice in task-based language teaching (TBLT). Prior research suggests that, when properly designed, task repetition can induce natural re-occurrence of a task interesting to learners, hence less fatigue and boredom than dry rehearsal. Repeating a task has also been associated with heightened L2 performance in previous studies. What remains inadequate in the field, however, is an ill-defined construct of task repetition as it appears to be often construed synonymously with task rehearsal. This chapter is a response to Bui’s (Processing perspectives on task performance. Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 63–94, 2014) call to differentiate rehearsal from task repetition as two different constructs, with the former involving learners’ awareness of future performance and the latter shunning such forewarning. Then a mini-meta-analysis of prior task repetition and rehearsal studies is presented to tease out the differentiating effects of the two constructs on L2 complexity, accuracy, lexis and fluency performance. Based on the patterns identified from the available information in those studies, theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G., & Huang, Z. (2018). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, methodology and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G., & Teng, F. (2018). Exploring learners’ behavioral patterns in two task-readiness conditions: A qualitative study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G., & Teng, F. (2019). Task planning and task-readiness. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0972.

  • Bui, G., & Skehan, P. (2018). Complexity, fluency and accuracy. In J. Liontas (Ed.), TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G., Skehan, P., & Wang, Z. (2018). Task condition effects on advanced level foreign language performance. In P. A. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 219–237). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G., Ahmadian, M., & Hunter, A. (2019). Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System, 81, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, G. (2019, online). Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning time on L2 lexical complexity. IRALInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0244.

  • Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–112). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekeyser, R., & Criado, R. (2012). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2019). Task preparedness. In Z. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan (pp. 15–38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). ACL-MIT Press series in natural-language processing: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (1994). Poster carousel. In K. Bailey & L. Savage (Eds.), New ways of teaching speaking (pp. 108–109). TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, M. (2017). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 50, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patanasorn, C. (2010). Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context. Northern Arizona University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (Ed.). (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan P. (2009). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, M. H. Daller, D. D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thai, C., & Boers, F. (2016). Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral presentation. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Bui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bui, G., Yu, R. (2021). Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. In: Sudharshana, N.P., Mukhopadhyay, L. (eds) Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4225-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4226-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics