Abstract
In previous chapters, we learned how simultaneous nucleation rate and growth rate of bubbles at instantaneous decompression are determined when temperature, pressure, and concentration of volatiles are obtained. However, to understand the entire image of the vesiculation process and vesicular texture observed in eruptive materials, such instantaneous nucleation rate and growth rate are insufficient. For this purpose, we should understand the history of the vesiculation process, i.e., the temporal development of bubble nucleation and growth processes because the fluid mechanical behavior of vesiculating magma and the vesicular texture of eruptive materials because of the nucleation rate and the growth rate temporally developed in response to temporally changing temperature, pressure, and volatile content in succession and from a mutual influence among each other. In this chapter, based on the assumption that pressure linearly decreases with time, a methodology to understand the temporal development of the vesiculation process will be explained. This helps understand the temporal development of the bubble size distribution function, and the result can be systematically understood using a small number of dimensionless controlling parameters. Moreover, the result will be applied to laboratory experiments to establish an empirical understanding of the vesiculation process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The problem of numerical instability is mostly solved using cubic interpolation (CIP).
- 2.
Contribution of changing \(R_\mathrm{C}\) to the number density is ignored.
- 3.
Differentiation is the rate of change of y, or dy, when x is changed infinitesimally in a function \(y=f(x)\), while variation is the rate of change of a function f when f itself changes. In this case, the curve of bubble growth \(R(t^{\prime },t)\) itself changes because of change of nucleation time \(t^{\prime }\).
- 4.
Numerical calculation with systematically changed controlling parameters is called a parametric study.
- 5.
Equations that include exponential function and/or logarithmic function and are algebraically unsolvable.
- 6.
Note that the subject differs from that for the diffusion-limited regime and the viscosity-limited regime discussed in the sections on bubble growth.
- 7.
Note that second nucleation is different from second boiling.
References
Bagdassarov N, Dorfman A, Dingwell D (2000) Effect of alkalis, phosphorus, and water on the surface tension of haplogranite melt. Am Mineral 85:33–40
Cluzel N, Laporte D, Provost A, Kannewischer I (2008) Kinetics of heterogeneous bubble nucleation in rhyolitic melts: implications for the number density of bubbles in volcanic conduits and for pumice textures. Contrib Mineral Petrol 156:745–763
Fiege A, Cichy SB (2015) Experimental constraints on bubble formation and growth during magma ascent: a review. Am Mineral 100(11–12):2426–2442
Fiege A, Holtz F, Cichy SB (2014) Bubble formation during decompression of andesitic melts. Am Mineral 99(5–6):1052–1062
Formenti Y, Druitt TH (2003) Vesicle connectivity in pyroclasts and implications for the fluidisation of fountain-collapse pyroclastic flows, Montserrat (West Indies). Earth Planet Sci Lett 214:561–574
Gardner JE (2007) Heterogeneous bubble nucleation in highly viscous silicate melts during instantaneous decompression from high pressure. Chem Geol 236:1–12
Gardner JE, Denis M-H (2004) Heterogeneous bubble nucleation on Fe-Ti oxide crystals in high-silica rhyolitic melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:3587–3597
Giachetti T, Burgisser A, Arbaret L, Druitt TH, Kelfoun K (2011) Quantitative textural analysis of Vulcanian pyroclasts (Montserrat) using multi-scale X-ray computed microtomography: comparison with results from 2D image analysis. Bull Volcano 73(9):1295–1309
Hamada M, Laporte D, Cluzel N, Koga KT, Kawamoto T (2010) Simulating bubble number density of rhyolitic pumices from Plinian eruptions: constraints from fast decompression experiments. Bull Volcanol 72(6):735–746
Hurwitz S, Navon O (1994) Bubble nucleation in rhyolitic melts: experiments at high pressure, temperature and water content, Earth Planet. Sci Lett 122:267–280
Klug C, Cashman K, Bacon C (2002) Structure and physical characteristics of pumice from the climactic eruption of Mount Mazama (Crater Lake). Oregon Bull Volcanol 64:486–501
Langer JS, Schwartz AJ (1980) Kinetics of nucleation in near-critical fluids. Phys Rev A 21:948–958
Mangan MT, Sisson TW (2000) Delayed, disequilibrium degassing in rhyolite magma. Decompression experiments and implications for explosive volcanism. Earth Planet Sci Lett 183:441–455
Mangan MT, Sisson TW (2005) Evolution of melt-vapor surface tension in silicic volcanic systems: Experiments with hydrous melts. J Geophys Res 110:B01202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB00321523-36
Massol H, Koyaguchi T (2005) The effect of magma flow on nucleation of gas bubbles in a volcanic conduit. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 143:69–88
Mourtada-Bonnefoi CC, Laporte D (2004) Kinetics of bubble nucleation in a rhyolitic melt: an experimental study of the effect of ascent rate. Earth Planet Sci Lett 218:521–537
Navon O, Lyakhovsky V (1998) Vesiculation processes in silicic magmas. In: Gilbert JS, Sparks RSJ (eds) The physics of explosive volcanic eruptions, vol 145. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp 27–50
Pichavant M, Di Carlo I, Rotolo SG, Scaillet B, Burgisser A, Le Gall N, Martel C (2013) Generation of CO\(_2\)-rich melts during basalt magma ascent and degassing. Contrib Mineral Petrol 166(2):545–561
Sakuma S, Murase T (1957) Some properties of natural glasses at high temperatures: viscosity and the growth of bubbles. Kazan 2(1):6–16, 09–30. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sakuyama M, Kushiro I (1979) Vesiculation of hydrous andesitic melt and transport of alkalies by separated vapor phase. Contrib Mineral Petrol 71(1):61–66
Shimozuru D, Nakamuda O, Seno H, Noda H, Taneda S (1957) Mechanism of Pumice Formation, Kazan 2(1):17–25, 1957-09-30. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sparks RSJ, Brazier S (1982) New evidence for degassing processes during explosive eruptions. Nature 295:218–220
Toramaru A (1989) Vesiculation process and bubble size distributions in ascending magmas with constant velocities. J Geophys Res 94:17523–17542
Toramaru A (1995) Numerical study of nucleation and growth of bubbles in viscous magmas. J Geophys Res 100:1913–1931
Toramaru A (2006) BND (bubble number density) decompression rate meter for explosive volcanic eruptions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 154:303–316
Toramaru A (2014) On the second nucleation of bubbles in magmas under sudden decompression. Earth Planet Sci Lett 404:190–199
Toramaru A, Miwa T (2008) Vesiculation and crystallization under instantaneous decompression: numerical study and comparison with laboratory experiments. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 177:983–996
Whitham AG, Sparks RSJ (1986) Pumice. Bull Volcanol 48:209–223
Yamada K, Tanaka H, Nakazawa K, Emori H (2005) A new theory of bubble formation in magma. J Geophys Res 110:B02203. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003113
Yamada K, Emori H, Nakazawa K (2008) Time-evolution of bubble formation in a viscous liquid. Earth Planets Space 60:661–679
Yamamoto T, Hasegawa H (1977) Grain formation through nucleation process in astrophysical environment. Prog Theor Phys 58:816–828. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.58.816
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toramaru, A. (2022). Temporal Development of Vesiculation. In: Vesiculation and Crystallization of Magma. Advances in Volcanology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4209-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4209-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4208-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4209-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)