Skip to main content

Growth and Expansion of Bubbles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vesiculation and Crystallization of Magma

Part of the book series: Advances in Volcanology ((VOLCAN))

  • 614 Accesses

Abstract

Bubbles nucleating in supersaturated liquids grow by \({\text {H}_{2}}\text {O}\) diffusion in melts into bubbles (the number of \({\text {H}_{2}}\text {O}\) molecules in the bubbles increases) and expand by decompression (the number of \({\text {H}_{2}}\text {O}\) molecules in the bubbles does not change but the molecular volume increases). In this manner, “growth” (“grow”) and “expansion” (“expand”) are used differently for different phenomena in this chapter. Although growth and expansion simultaneously progress, their behavior will be separately understood by ignoring the other at first. Then, the two phenomena will be combined to understand the experimental results. In this chapter, important factors including time constants of various elemental processes and their dimensionless number ratios, such as the Pélclet number, which is the ratio of the diffusion to the viscosity-limited expansion rate, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It slightly differs from crystal growth. Reaction-controlled crystal growth rate is driven by difference between concentration in liquid and equilibrium concentration at interface (i.e., the degree of supersaturation).

  2. 2.

    This equation slightly differs from the equation for crystallization (Eq. 7.38). This results from (1) difference in the equation of state between bubbles and crystals (This is attributed to the equation of state of gas, whereas crystals are assumed to be linear elastic bodies) and (2) difference in activity relation (water is proportional to the square of concentration, whereas crystals are assumed to be an ideal solution). If an ideal gas \(P_\mathrm{G}^{*} = k_\mathrm{B} T / v_\mathrm{G} \) is applied to gas, the equation agrees with the corresponding definitional equation of crystallization in the following form: \(R_{P}^{*} = 2 \gamma v_\mathrm{G} / k_\mathrm{B} T \).

  3. 3.

    Assuming \(y=C_\mathrm{eq}/C, y^{-2} -1\) gives an estimate of the dimensionless degree of supersaturation, \(\Delta \), and the dimensionless degree of supersaturation \(\Delta \) and the critical nucleus radius \(R_\mathrm{C}\) generally have a relationship

    figure a

    then

    figure b

    can be written.

  4. 4.

    In actuality, \(v_\mathrm{G}\) changes in accordance with the equation of state, e.g., \(v_\mathrm{G} = k_\mathrm{B} T/ P_\mathrm{G}\).

  5. 5.

    Difference from the case of crystallization lies at 2 in the denominator.

  6. 6.

    For the initial delay in bubble growth, when Proussevitch et al. (1993) first indicated it in calculation of bubble growth by a cell model, Sparks (1994) argued that the delay was attributed to viscosity. Sparks (1978) had reviewed the problem of the initial delay in bubble growth and had recognized the problem of the critical size at which the surface tension was effective, as well as the influence of viscosity. Against this, Proussevitch et al. (1993) showed additional simulation results and were adamant that it was the effect of interfacial tension. After that, Navon et al. (1998) revealed that the delay in bubbles’ viscosity-limited growth has exponential characteristics.

  7. 7.

    An inviscid liquid case had been derived by Rayleigh (1917); after that, Poritsky (1952) introduced the viscosity term and then Plesset and Prosperetti (1977) widely spread the use of the equation.

  8. 8.

    Taking \(\ddot{R}=d \dot{R} / dt = d \dot{R} /dR \cdot d R/ dt = \dot{R} \cdot d \dot{R} /dR\) into consideration, Eq. (4.76) can be rewritten as

    figure c

    Assuming \(y= \dot{R(t)}^{2} /2\),

    $$ \frac{dy}{dR} + \frac{3}{R} y = \frac{1}{R} \left( \frac{\Delta P_\mathrm{G}}{\rho } - \frac{2 \gamma }{\rho } \frac{1}{R} \right) $$

    is obtained, which is an inhomogeneous first-order linear differential equation with respect to y as a function of R and can be solved by the variation of constants method. Assuming \(y=0\) when \(R=R(0)=R_\mathrm{B}\), the constants of integration (0) can be determined.

  9. 9.

    Scaling of the above equation by this timescale (\(\tilde{R}=R/R(0)\), \(\tilde{t} = t/t_\mathrm{c}\)) gives

    figure d
  10. 10.

    The Péclet number defined here does not represent the ratio of advection to diffusion conventionally used in matter transport. The conventionally used ratio is the ratio of the advection term of the diffusion equation (the second term on the left-hand side of Eq. (4.1)) to the diffusion term (the right-hand side of Eq. (4.1)), such as the Péclet number described in Sect. 4.3.2. However, note that the advection term is not included in the discussion here.

  11. 11.

    Between diffusivity and viscosity, the classical Stokes-Einstein relation holds 

    figure e

    in some cases. In this equation, \(a_{\mathrm {M}}\) is the effective radius of a molecule; however, this relation does not hold between the viscosity and the molecular diffusion of silicate melt (Liang et al. 1997).

  12. 12.

    You can convert the unit of concentration from wt% to (number of molecules/m\(^{3}\)) by replacing \(\rho _\mathrm{G} / \rho \) \(P_\mathrm{G} / k_\mathrm{B} T = 1/ v_\mathrm{G}(P_\mathrm{G})\), where \(v_\mathrm{G}(P_\mathrm{G})\) is the volume of one water molecule in gas at the pressure \(P_\mathrm{G}\).

References

  • Amon M, Denson CD (1984) A study of the dynamics of foam growth: analysis of the growth of closely spaced spherical bubbles. Polymer Eng Sci 24:1026–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay J, Riley DS, Sparks RSJ (1995) Analytical models for bubble growth during decompression of high viscosity magmas. Bull Volcanol 57:422–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (1960) Transport phenomena. Wiley, New York, p 780

    Google Scholar 

  • Blower JD, Madera HM, Wilson SDR (2001) Coupling of viscous and diffusive controls on bubble growth during explosive volcanic eruptions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 193:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundy J, Cashman K, Humphreys M (2006) Magma heating by decompression-driven crystallization beneath andesite volcanoes. Nature 443(7107):76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogler HS, Goddard JD (1970) Collapse of spherical cavities in viscoelastic fluids. Phys Fluid 13:1135–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JE, Hilton M, Carroll MR (1999) Experimental constraints on degassing of magma: isothermal bubble growth during continuous decompression from high pressure. Earth Planet Sci Lett 168:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondé C, Martel C, Pichavant M, Bureau H (2011) In situ bubble vesiculation in silicic magmas. Am Mineral 96(1):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichihara M, Okunitani H, Ida Y, Kameda M (2004) Dynamics of bubble oscillation and wave propagation in viscoelastic liquids. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 129:37–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller JB, Miksis M (1980) Bubble oscillations of large amplitude. J Acoustical Soc Am 68(2):628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensky NG, Navon O, Lyakhovsky V (2004) Bubble growth during decompression of magma: experimental and theoretical investigation. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 129:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Richter FM, Chmberlin L (1997) Diffusion in silicate melts: III. Emprical models for multicomponent diffusion. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:5295–5312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhang Y, Behrens H (2004) H\(_{2}\)O diffusion in dacitic melts. Chem Geol 209:327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyakhovsky V, Hurwitz S, Navon O (1996) Bubble growth in rhyolitic melts: experimental and numerical investigation. Bull Volcanol 58:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel C, Bureau H (2001) In situ high-pressure and high-temperature bubble growth in silicic melts. Earth Planet Sci Lett 191:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon O, Chekhmir A, Lyakhovsky V (1998) Bubble growth in highly viscous melts: Theory, experiments, and autoexplosivity of dome lavas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 160:763–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plesset MS, Prosperetti A (1977) Bubble dynamics and cavitation. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 9:145–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poritsky H (1952) The collapse or growth of a spherical bubble or cabity in a viscous fluid. Proc First Nat Cong Appl Mech 813–821-D

    Google Scholar 

  • Proussevitch AA, Sahagian DL, Kutolin VA (1993) Stability of foams in silicate melts. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 59:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proussevitch AA, Sahagian DL, Anderson VAT (1993) Dynamics of diffusive bubble growth in magmas: isothermal case. J Geophys Res 98:22283–22307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proussevitch AA, Sahagian DL, Anderson VAT (1994) Reply to comments by sparks. J Geophys Res 99:17829–17832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayleigh L (1917) On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philosophical Mag J Sci 34:94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahagian DL, Proussevitch AA (1996) Thermal effects of magma degassing. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 74:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw H (1974) Diffusion of H\(_{2}\)O in granitic liquids: part I. experimental data; part II. Mass transfer in magma chambers. In: Geochemical transport and kinetics, vol 634. Carnegie I, Washington, pp 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RSJ (1994) Comments on “Dynamics of diffusive bubble growth in magmas: Isothermal case” by A. A. Proussevitch, D. L. Sahagian, and V. A. T. Anderson. J Geophys Res 99:17827–17828

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RSJ (1978) The dynamics of bubble formation and growth in magmas: a review and analysis. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 3:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toramaru A (1995) Numerical study of nucleation and growth of bubbles in viscous magmas. J Geophys Res 100:1913–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Toramaru .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Toramaru, A. (2022). Growth and Expansion of Bubbles. In: Vesiculation and Crystallization of Magma. Advances in Volcanology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4209-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics