Skip to main content

Analyses of the Small Electoral Biases in Single-Member Constituencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Operation of the Japanese Electoral System since 1994
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 5 addresses the amplification of the first-past-the-post system’s operation of benefitting the largest party. In order to substantiate this inference, this chapter estimates electoral biases. An electoral bias is estimated by calculating the gap between the actual number and the notional number of seats for each of the parties concerned, assuming a uniform swing across all single-member constituencies. Therefore, the application of this framework to Japan suits the argument of this research. This chapter demonstrates that electoral biases are smaller in Japan than in the United Kingdom. Besides, this chapter demonstrates that they are often against the Liberal Democratic Party, although there are exceptions. This chapter also demonstrates that the geography component and the minor party victory component are large, although they vary, depending on the general election and the parties concerned. The small electoral biases suggest that the controversies surrounding the drawings of single-member constituencies such as malapportionment and gerrymandering matter little in Japan. This is in the sense that the homogeneous distributions of party supports prevent them from having a big impact on electoral results and not that malapportionment and gerrymandering have hardly happened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

English Literature

  • Borisyuk, Galina, Ron Johnston, Michael Thrasher & Colin Rallings (2008) “Measuring Bias: Moving from Two-Party to Three-Party Elections”, Electoral Studies, Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisyuk, Galina, Ron Johnston, Michael Thrasher & Colin Rallings (2010) “A Method for Measuring and Decomposing Electoral Bias for the Three-Party Case, Illustrated by the British Case”, Electoral Studies, Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, R. H. (1953) “The Butler Analysis and the Cube Law: Seats and Votes in New Zealand”, Political Science, Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, R. H. (1959) “Electoral Distortion in New Zealand”, The Australian Journal of Politics and History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, R. H. (1960) “The Analysis of Distorted Representation in Two-Party Single-Member Elections”, Political Science, Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Ron, Galina Borisyuk, Michael Thrasher & Colin Rallings (2012) “Unequal and Unequally Distributed Votes: The Sources of Electoral Bias at Recent British General Elections”, Political Studies, Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 877–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Ron & Charles Pattie (2011) “The British General Election of 2010: A Three-Party Contest – or Three Two-Party Contests?”, The Geographical Journal, Volume 177, Number 1, Pages 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Ron, Charles Pattie, Danny Dorling & David Rossiter (2001) From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System Since 1945 (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Ron, David Rossiter & Charles Pattie (2006) “Disproportionality and Bias in the Results of the 2005 General Election in Great Britain: Evaluating the Electoral System’s Impact”, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jou, Willy (2009) “Partisan Bias in Japan’s Single Member Districts”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, D. J., R. J. Johnston & C. J. Pattie (1999) The Boundary Commissions: Redrawing the UK’s Map of Parliamentary Constituencies (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, Michael, Galina Borisyuk, Colin Rallings & Ron Johnston (2011) “Electoral Bias at the 2010 General Election: Evaluating its Extent in a Three-Party System”, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, Michael, Galina Borisyuk, Colin Rallings, Ron Johnston & Charles Pattie (2016) “Electoral Bias at the 2015 General Election: Reducing Labour’s Electoral Advantage”, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 391–411.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nagatomi, K. (2021). Analyses of the Small Electoral Biases in Single-Member Constituencies. In: The Operation of the Japanese Electoral System since 1994. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3985-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics