Abstract
This chapter focuses on emerging opportunities and related challenges associated with medical device development. In a rapidly changing healthcare environment and related support structure, it has become essential to develop products and technologies that are not only innovative and affordable, but at the same time, safe and reliable for long-term performance stability. With the advancement of efficient computational platforms and artificial intelligence, newer opportunities in the form of software-driven medical devices and robotic minimally invasive surgical systems have emerged as key thrust areas in medical device manufacturing sector. A lot of research outcomes are being reported worldwide for development of haptic feedback-based robotic manipulators for complex surgical procedures. Leading industry manufacturers are focusing on transdisciplinary synergetic research for faster product development and subsequent market deployment. However, such medical cyber-physical systems have also brought out the need for ensuring product safety and data security for uncompromised privacy and process integrity. There are other challenges related to validation, certification and regulations of healthcare-related mobile applications and software-driven diagnostic and therapeutic tools which need to be handled with highest priority for patient safety. The chapter focuses on the AI-powered and software-driven medical devices as well as various technologies of robotic surgery and the associated research opportunities and challenges in these domains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blumenthal, D., Tavenner, M.: The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(6), 501–504 (2010)
Alexandru, A., et al.: Healthcare, big data and cloud computing. Management 1, 2 (2016)
Raghupathi, W., Raghupathi, V.: Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2(1), 1–10 (2014)
Wall, J., Chandra, V., Krummel, T.: Robotics in general surgery. In: Medical Robotics. IntechOpen (2008)
Ghodoussi, M., Butner, S.E., Wang, Y.: Robotic surgery-the transatlantic case. In: Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292). IEEE (2002)
Gordon, W.J., Stern, A.D.: Challenges and opportunities in software-driven medical devices. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3(7), 493–497 (2019)
Wang, S., Ding, S., Xiong, L.: A new system for surveillance and digital contact tracing for COVID-19: spatiotemporal reporting over network and GPS. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8(6), e19457 (2020)
Fu, K.: Trustworthy medical device software. Public Health Effectiveness FDA 510, 102 (2011)
Burleson, W., et al.: Design challenges for secure implantable medical devices. In: DAC Design Automation Conference 2012. IEEE
Clark, S.S., Fu, K.: Recent results in computer security for medical devices. In: International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Group, I.S.W.: Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): key definitions. 9, 9. Published online December (2013)
Digital Health Criteria (FDA, 2018): (2018). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health/digital-health-criteria
Developing Software Precertification Program: A Working Model US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administrartion (2018)
Horgan, S., Vanuno, D.: Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 11(6), 415–419 (2001)
Bass, E.B., Pitt, H.A., Lillemoe, K.D.: Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 165(4), 466–471 (1993)
Wagner, C.R., Howe, R.D., Stylopoulos, N.: The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. In: International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. Citeseer (2002)
Lobontiu, A.: The da Vinci surgical system performing computer-enhanced surgery. Osp Ital Chir 7, 367–721 (2001)
Wei, G.-Q., Arbter, K., Hirzinger, G.: Automatic tracking of laparoscopic instruments by color coding. In: CVRMed-MRCAS’97. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Arbter, K., Wei, G.-Q.: Method of tracking a surgical instrument with a mono or stereo laparoscope. Google Patents (1998)
Wilson, E.: The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand. J. Surg. 98(2), 125–129 (2009)
Kim, K.P., Miller, D.L.: Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 133(4), 227–233 (2009)
Sandblom, V., et al.: Evaluation of the impact of a system for real-time visualisation of occupational radiation dose rate during fluoroscopically guided procedures. J. Radiol. Prot. 33(3), 693 (2013)
Kesavachandran, C.N., Haamann, F., Nienhaus, A.: Radiation exposure and adverse health effects of interventional cardiology staff. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, pp. 73–91. Springer (2013)
Goni, H., et al.: Investigation of occupational radiation exposure during interventional cardiac catheterisations performed via radial artery. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 117(1–3), 107–110 (2005)
Moll, F.H., et al.: Methods using a robotic catheter system. Google Patents (2010)
Guo, J., Guo, S., Yu, Y.: Design and characteristics evaluation of a novel teleoperated robotic catheterization system with force feedback for vascular interventional surgery. Biomed. Microdevice 18(5), 76 (2016)
Moll, F.H., et al.: Instrument driver for robotic catheter system. Google Patents (2011)
Guo, S., et al.: A novel robot-assisted endovascular catheterization system with haptic force feedback. IEEE Trans. Rob. 35(3), 685–696 (2019)
Rafii-Tari, H., Payne, C.J., Yang, G.-Z.: Current and emerging robot-assisted endovascular catheterization technologies: a review. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42(4), 697–715 (2014)
Pasca, C., et al.: Intelligent haptic sensor system for robotic manipulation. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. IMTC 04 (2004)
Kirkpatrick, A.E., Douglas, S.A.: Application-based evaluation of haptic interfaces. In: Proceedings of 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2002. HAPTICS 2002. IEEE (2002)
Massie, T.H., Salisbury, J.K.: The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects. In: Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. Kluwer (1994)
Bethea, B.T., et al.: Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 14(3), 191–195 (2004)
Tiwana, M.I., Redmond, S.J., Lovell, N.H.: A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Sens. Actuators A 179, 17–31 (2012)
Girão, P.S., et al.: Tactile sensors for robotic applications. Measurement 46(3), 1257–1271 (2013)
Hanna, S., et al.: Take two software updates and see me in the morning: the case for software security evaluations of medical devices. In: HealthSec (2011)
Rakitin, S.R.: Networked medical devices: essential collaboration for improved safety. Biomed. Instrum. Technol. 43(4), 332–338 (2009)
Alsubaei, F., Abuhussein, A., Shiva, S.: Security and privacy in the internet of medical things: taxonomy and risk assessment. In: 2017 IEEE 42nd Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops (LCN Workshops). IEEE (2017)
Lee, I., et al.: High-confidence medical device software and systems. Computer 39(4), 33–38 (2006)
Guidance for Industry, Process Validation: General Principles and Practices (US Food Drug Administration). Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD (2011)
Janda, M., Buch, B.: The challenges of clinical validation of emerging technologies: computer-assisted devices for surgery. JBJS 91(Supplement_1), 17–21 (2009)
Haidegger, T.: Surgical robots: system development, assessment, and clearance. In: Prototyping of Robotic Systems: Applications of Design and Implementation, pp. 288–326. IGI Global (2012)
Lee, I., et al.: Challenges and research directions in medical cyber–physical systems. Proc. IEEE 100(1), 75–90 (2011)
Hrgarek, N.: Certification and regulatory challenges in medical device software development. In: 2012 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering in Health Care (SEHC). IEEE (2012)
Vogel, D.A.: Medical device software verification, validation and compliance. Artech House (2011)
Gatouillat, A., et al.: Internet of medical things: a review of recent contributions dealing with cyber-physical systems in medicine. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(5), 3810–3822 (2018)
McHugh, M., McCaffery, F., Casey, V.: Barriers to adopting agile practices when developing medical device software. In: International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. Springer, Berlin (2012)
General Principles of Software Validation. Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, USFDA, pp. 33–34 (2002)
Shuren, J., Patel, B., Gottlieb, S.: FDA regulation of mobile medical apps. JAMA 320(4), 337–338 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khatri, N., Kumar, M., Jha, R. (2022). Opportunities and Challenges in Medical Robotic Device Development. In: Joshi, S.N., Chandra, P. (eds) Advanced Micro- and Nano-manufacturing Technologies. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3645-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3645-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3644-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3645-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)