This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Temple of Preah Vihear: Brief Description, World Heritage List, available athttp://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1224 (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
- 2.
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), 1962 I.C.J. 6 (June 15), available athttp://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/45/4871.pdf (last visited on Jan. 10, 2009).
- 3.
Decisions Adopted at the 32nd Session of the World Heritage Committee (Quebec City 2008), available athttp://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/32COM (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
- 4.
Kingdom ofCambodia,4 TheTemple ofPreahVihear: Proposed for theInscription on theWorldHeritageList(UNESCO) (Counsel of Ministers eds., 2008), available athttp://www.preah-vihear.com/PreahVihearProposalbyRGC.pdf (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
- 5.
Id. at 8.
- 6.
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), 1962 I.C.J. at 11.
- 7.
Id. at 36–37.
- 8.
Id. at 36.
- 9.
NOTE TO U.N. ACTING SECRETARY-GENERAL NO. (0601) 22,239/2505 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, July 6, B.E. 2505 (1962).
- 10.
The Statute of the International Court of Justice, Art. 61 states:
-
1.
An application for revision of a judgment may be made only when it is based upon the discovery of some fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor, which fact was, when the judgment was given, unknown to the Court and also to the party claiming revision, always provided that such ignorance was not due to negligence.
-
2.
The proceedings for revision shall be opened by a judgment of the Court expressly recording the existence of the new fact, recognizing that it has such a character as to lay the case open to revision, and declaring the application admissible on this ground.
-
3.
The Court may require previous compliance with the terms of the judgment before it admits proceedings in revision.
-
4.
The application for revision must be made at latest within six months of the discovery of the new fact.
-
5.
No application for revision may be made after the lapse of ten years from the date of the judgment.
-
1.
- 11.
Note to U.N. ACTING SECRETARY-GENERAL NO.(0601) 22,239/2505 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, July 6, B.E. 2505 (1962).
- 12.
The Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 60 stipulates that “[t]he judgment is final and without appeal. In the event of dispute as to the meaning or scope of the judgment, the Court shall construe it upon the request of any party.”.
- 13.
See AboutWorldHeritage, available athttp://whc.unesco.org/en/about/ (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
- 14.
Id.
- 15.
Draft Decision 31 Com 8B.24, Decisions Adopted at the 31st Session of the World Heritage Committee 155 (Christchurch 2007), available athttp://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/31COM/documents/ (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
- 16.
See supra note 4.
- 17.
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Rule 103, available athttp://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf (last visited on Jan. 12, 2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 YIJUN Institute of International Law
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pakdeekong, M. (2022). Who Owns the Preah Vihear Temple? A Thai Position. In: Lee, E.Y.J. (eds) ASEAN International Law. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3195-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3195-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3194-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3195-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)