Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Optimizing Cutting Force Components in Turning Stainless Steel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mechanical and Materials Technology (EMSME 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 2058 Accesses

Abstract

Improved turning performance is critical for higher-quality goods to be manufactured and costs to be reduced. The aim of this paper is to determine the optimal cutting parameters that minimize the net force in turning AISI 201 stainless steel using different mathematical optimization algorithms. Spindle speed, feed, depth of cut, and workpiece diameter were selected as machining parameters. L16 Taguchi design of experiments was employed which include four factors and four levels. In addition, regression models were developed to estimate cutting forces. Then, several mathematical optimization algorithms were used to find the optimal parameters that minimize the net force. The algorithms employed in this paper were brute–force algorithm, genetic algorithm, SHGO algorithm, and basin-hopping algorithm. These algorithms were able to find optimal solutions to a set of equations with bounds and constraints. Both deterministic and non-deterministic techniques were used in these algorithms to achieve the optimized value. The optimal parameters in this investigation were cutting speed 245 rpm, feed 0.17 mm/rev, depth of cut 0.2 mm. and workpiece diameter 19.1 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gupta MK, Mia M, Pruncu CI et al (2019) Parametric optimization and process capability analysis for machining of nickel-based superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:3995–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03453-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahoo P (2011) Optimization of turning parameters for surface roughness using RSM and GA. Adv Prod Eng Manag 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mia M, Grzegorz K, Radoslaw M, Szymon W (2019) Intelligent optimization of hard-turning parameters using evolutionary algorithms for smart manufacturing. Materials 12:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Radovanović M (2019) Multi-objective optimization of multi-pass turning AISI 1064 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2689-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Changle T, Zhou G, Zhang J, Chao Z (2019) Optimization of cutting parameters considering tool wear conditions in low-carbon manufacturing environment. J Clean Prod 226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.113

  6. Mia M, Dhar NR (2019) Prediction and optimization by using SVR, RSM and GA in hard turning of tempered AISI 1060 steel under effective cooling condition. Neural Comput Appl 31:2349–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3192-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laouissi A, Yallese MA, Belbah A et al (2019) Investigation, modeling, and optimization of cutting parameters in turning of gray cast iron using coated and uncoated silicon nitride ceramic tools. Based on ANN, RSM, and GA optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:523–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2931-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saidi R, Fathallah BB, Mabrouki T et al (2019) Modeling and optimization of the turning parameters of cobalt alloy (Stellite 6) based on RSM and desirability function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2945–2968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2816-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azizi MW, Belhadi S, Yallese MA et al (2012) Surface roughness and cutting forces modeling for optimization of machining condition in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mech Sci Technol 26:4105–4114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0885-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh BK, Mondal B, Mandal N (2016) Machinability evaluation and desirability function optimization of turning parameters for Cr2O3 doped zirconia toughened alumina (Cr-ZTA) cutting insert in high speed machining of steel. Ceram Int 42(2):3338–3350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shivakoti I, Kibria G, Pradhan P, Pradhan B, Sharma A (2018) ANFIS based prediction and parametric analysis during turning operation of stainless steel 202. Mater Manuf Process 34:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1512134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Chau N, Nguyen M, Dao T et al (2019) An effective approach of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-integrated teaching learning-based optimization for use in machining optimization of S45C CNC turning. Optim Eng 20:811–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-018-09418-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pathak H, Das S, Doley R, Kashyap S (2020) Optimization of cutting parameters for AISI H13 tool steel by Taguchi method and artificial neural network. In: Deep learning and neural networks, pp 531–551. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0414-7.ch030

  14. Singaravel B, Selvaraj T, Vinodh S (2016) Multi-objective optimization of turning parameters using the combined moora and entropy method. T Can Soc Mech Eng 40(1):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2016-0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thakur A, Manna A, Samir S (2020) Multi-response optimization of turning parameters during machining of EN-24 steel with SiC nanofluids based minimum quantity lubrication. SILICON 12:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00102-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Angappan P, Selvaraj T (2017) Optimisation of turning parameters for surface integrity properties on incoloy 800H superalloy using cryogenically treated multilayer CVD coated tool. Surf Rev Lett 26.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X18501391

  17. Vasudevan H et al (2019) Optimization of machining parameters in the turning operation of Inconel 825 using grey relation analysis: ICIMA 2018.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2490-1_37

  18. Younas M, Jaffery SHI, Khan M et al (2019) Multi-objective optimization for sustainable turning Ti6Al4V alloy using grey relational analysis (GRA) based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04299-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Umamaheswarraoa P, Rajub DR, Sumanc KNS, Sankar BR (2018) Multi objective optimization of process parameters for hard turning of AISI 52100 steel using Hybrid GRA-PCA. Procedia Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahilan C, Kumanan S, Sivakumaran N (2010) Application of grey based Taguchi method in multi-response optimization of turning process. Adv Prod Eng Manag 5(3):171–180

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tamizharasan T, Barnabas JK, Pakkirisamy V (2012) Optimization of turning parameters by using design of experiments and simulated annealing algorithm based on audible acoustic emission signals. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 226(7):1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412442779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahali MA, Belaidi I, Serra R (2016) New approach for robust multi-objective optimization of turning parameters using probabilistic genetic algorithm. Int J Aadv Manuf Tech 83(5–8):1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7526-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramanujan R, Venkatesan P, Saxena V, Joseph P (2014) Modeling and Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Dry Turning of Inconel 718 Using Coated Carbide Inserts. Int Con Adv Manuf Mat Eng 5:2550–2559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luo HS, Zhao C (2013) Low temperature salt bath hardening of AISI 201 austenitic stainless steel. Phys Procedia 50:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmed T, Mollick N, Mahmud S, Ahmad T (2020) Analysis of effects of machining parameterson cutting force components in turning AISI 201 stainless steel using cemented carbide cutting tool insert. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.416

  26. Taylor JR (2005) Classical mechanics. University Science Books

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernstein DJ (2005) Understanding brute force. In: Workshop record of ECRYPT STVL workshop on symmetric key encryption, eSTREAM report, vol 36

    Google Scholar 

  28. Endres SC, Sandrock C, Focke WW (2018) A simplicial homology algorithm for Lipschitz optimisation. J Global Optim 72(2):181–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Geneticalgorithm, https://github.com/rmsolgi/geneticalgorithm. Accessed 20 Aug 2020

  31. Wales DJ, Doye JPK (1997) Global optimization by Basin-Hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. J Phys Chem A 101:5111. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970984n

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, 6204, Bangladesh

    Toukir Ahmed & Shahed Mahmud

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, Dhaka, 1205, Bangladesh

    Ferdous Al Rafi

Authors
  1. Toukir Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ferdous Al Rafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahed Mahmud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toukir Ahmed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Kannan Govindan

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Harish Kumar

  3. Physico-Mechanical Metrology, CSIR—National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, India

    Sanjay Yadav

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ahmed, T., Al Rafi, F., Mahmud, S. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Optimizing Cutting Force Components in Turning Stainless Steel. In: Govindan, K., Kumar, H., Yadav, S. (eds) Advances in Mechanical and Materials Technology . EMSME 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2794-1_107

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2794-1_107

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2793-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2794-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation