Abstract
We have looked at interesting relations between two representations of the same data, the contingency-table format and the response-pattern format. Although the main objective of quantifying the contingency table is to carry out bi-modal analysis of rows and columns of the table, the contingency table is in some sense not amenable to bi-modal analysis, but requires the incorporation of the space discrepancy angle to estimate the row and the column coordinates for complimentary space of each component—this was discussed in Chap. 3. As we have seen in the previous chapters, a direct way of finding coordinates of rows and columns in common space is to analyse the response-pattern table. From the information retrieval point of view, the use of the response-pattern table is by far superior to the use of the contingency-table format, for the response-pattern format yields not only exact Euclidean coordinates for both rows and columns in common space but also provides some extra information to characterize information in the data that the contingency table no longer contains. This extra information on the response-pattern table will also be discussed in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Garmize, L. M., & Rychlak, J. F. (1964). Role-play validation of a socio-cultural theory of symbolism. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 107–115.
Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic.
Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Tabard, N. (1977). Techniques de la Description Statistique: Méthodes et Logiciels pour l’Analyse des Grands Tableaux. Paris: Dunod.
Lebart, L., & Mirkin, B.D. (1993). Correspondence analysis and classification. Multivariate Analysis: Future Directions 2, 341–357.
Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.
Nishisato, S. (2014). Structural representation of categorical data and cluster analysis through filters. In Gaul, W., Geyer-Schultz, A., Baba, Y. and Okada, A. (Eds.)., German- Japanese Interchange of Data Analysis Results. Springer, 81–90.
Nishisato, S. (2019). Reminiscence: Quantification theory and graphs. Theory and Applications of Data Analysis, 8, 47–57. (in Japanese).
Nishisato, S., & Clavel, J. G. (2010). Total information analysis: Comprehensive dual scaling. Behaviormetrika, 37, 15–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nishisato, S., Beh, E.J., Lombardo, R., Clavel, J.G. (2021). Coordinates for Joint Graphs. In: Modern Quantification Theory. Behaviormetrics: Quantitative Approaches to Human Behavior, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2470-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2470-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2469-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2470-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)