Skip to main content

Mathematical Preliminaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Quantification Theory

Part of the book series: Behaviormetrics: Quantitative Approaches to Human Behavior ((BQAHB,volume 8))

  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

One of the fundamental problems in today’s mathematics education is the lack of proper teaching on how to draw a simple graph of scores on, for example, a mathematics test (\(X_{1}\)) and an English test (\(X_{2}\)). It is reasonable to assume that \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) are generally correlated (i.e., those who score high on the mathematics test tend to score high on the English test). Yet, irrespective of the correlation between the two tests, the teachers typically instruct their students to plot the mathematics scores on the horizontal axis and the English scores on the vertical axis. Notice that we use these orthogonal axes for two tests, irrespective of their correlation. Do you see any inconsistency in this combination of orthogonal axes and correlated test scores? This is the problem we are discussing now.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441, 498–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato, S. and Yamauchi, H. (1974). Principal components of deviation scores and standard scores. Japanese Psychological Research, 16, 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato, S. (1996). Gleaning in the field of dual scaling. Psychometirka, 61, 559–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazines and Journal of Science, Series, 6(2), 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods for Biometric Research. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K., Yanai, H., & Mukherjee, N. N. (1982). The Foundations of Multivariate Analysis: A Unified Approach by Means of Projection Onto Linear Subspaces. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shizuhiko Nishisato .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nishisato, S., Beh, E.J., Lombardo, R., Clavel, J.G. (2021). Mathematical Preliminaries. In: Modern Quantification Theory. Behaviormetrics: Quantitative Approaches to Human Behavior, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2470-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics