Skip to main content

The Comparison Analysis of Cluster and Non-cluster Based Routing Protocols for WAPMS (Wireless Air Pollution Monitoring System)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Sustainable Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 213))

  • 733 Accesses

Abstract

With increasing industries, the air pollution monitoring system has become the main challenge of intelligent cities. Several methods have been developed in APMS, and WSNs seem like the solution to sensors, because of less cost, and dense deployment. Thus, the deployment of the sensors is significant for better performance while assuring less economic cost. WSN is related to the set of distributed sensors for monitoring the PHY situations and arranging the gathered data at the central position. In this article, a comparative analysis is defined in routing protocols for WAPMS to study and defined the advantages and disadvantages. The conclusion showed the prior protocols into two different classes such as cluster and non-cluster based routing protocols. The cluster-based methods have designed the PHY network into virtual classes, whereas the non-cluster based protocols both use broadcasting tools for data communication cluster-based routing protocol, compared to LEACH; TLLEACH is based on the two-level cluster heads (CHs) with less communication distance, and less hop is necessary to transfer for distance to the base station. It reduces the average energy consumption. Their network parameters are calculated to E2D and energy in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wei, Y., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D.: An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, IEEE, vol. 3, pp. 1567–1576 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ying, Y.W., Lo, K.M., Mak, T., Leung, K.S., Leung, Y., Meng, M.L.: A survey of wireless sensor network based air pollution monitoring systems. Sensors 15(12), 31392–31427 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kadri, A., Yaacoub, E., Mushtaha, M., Abu-Dayya, A.: Wireless sensor network for real-time air pollution monitoring. In: 2013 1st International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA), IEEE, pp. 1–5 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham, S., Li, X.: A cost-effective wireless sensor network system for ındoor air quality monitoring applications. In: FNC/MobiSPC, pp. 165–171 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bathiya, B., Srivastava, S., Mishra, B.: Air pollution monitoring using wireless sensor network. In: 2016 IEEE İnternational WIE Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), IEEE, pp. 112–117 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhushan, B., Sahoo, G.: Routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: Computational İntelligence in Sensor Networks, pp. 215–248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patil, D., Thanuja, T.C., Melinamath, B.C.: Air pollution monitoring system using wireless sensor network (WSN). In: Data Management, Analytics and Innovation, pp. 391–400. Springer, Singapore. (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roopashree, J., Raghunath, C.R., Ravikumar, D. Low power EMC optimized wireless sensor network for air pollution monitoring system. Int. J. Recent Innovation Trends Comput. Commun. 3(6), 3532–3537 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saini, J., Dutta, M., Marques, G.: A comprehensive review on indoor air quality monitoring systems for enhanced public health. Sustainable Environ. Res. 30(1), 6 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohamed, R.E., Saleh, A.I., Abdelrazzak, M., Samra, A.S.: Survey on wireless sensor network applications and energy efficient routing protocols. Wireless Pers. Commun. 101(2), 1019–1055 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, J., Zhang, Z., Shen, S., Zou, Z.: An Improved Air Quality Monitoring System Based on Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication and Information Systems, pp. 31–36 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaivonen, S., Ngai, E.C.-H.: Real-time air pollution monitoring with sensors on city bus. Digital Commun. Networks 6(1), 23–30 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, C., Yang, J., Gao, Y., Zhang, Z.: Cluster-based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In: Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, IEEE, vol. 3, pp. 1659–1663 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sumathi, J., Velusamy, R.L.: A review on distributed cluster based routing approaches in mobile wireless sensor networks. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain, I., Ahmed, Z.I., Saikia, D.K., Sarma, N.: A QoS-aware dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme for multi-hop WiFi-based long distance networks. EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Networking 2015(1), 160 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kakarla, J., Majhi, B., Battula, R.B.: Comparative analysis of routing protocols in wireless sensor–actor networks: a review. Int. J. Wireless Inf. Networks 22(3), 220–239 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii Ä°nternational Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, p. 10 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manjeshwar, A., Agrawal, D.P.: TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Ä°PDPS, vol. 1, p. 189 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yarinezhad, R.: Reducing delay and prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor network using efficient routing protocol based on mobile sink and virtual infrastructure. Ad Hoc Netw. 84, 42–55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Braman, A., Umapathi, G.R.: A comparative study on advances in LEACH routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: a survey. 3(2), 5883–5890 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindsey, S., Raghavendra, C., Sivalingam, K.M.: Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 13(9), 924–935 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Durresi, A., Paruchuri, V.: Geometric broadcast protocol for sensor and actor networks. In: 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA'05) Volume 1 (AINA papers), IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 343–348 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Somauroo, A., Bassoo, V.: Energy-efficient genetic algorithm variants of PEGASIS for 3D wireless sensor networks. Appl. Comput. Inf. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fuhrmann, T.: Scalable routing in sensor actuator networks with churn. In: 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 30–39 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, Y., Ngai, E.C.-H., Lyu, M.R., Liu, J.: POWER-SPEED: a power-controlled real-time data transport protocol for wireless sensor-actuator networks. In: 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, IEEE, pp. 3736–3740 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zafar, S., Bashir, A., Chaudhry, S.A.: Mobility-aware hierarchical clustering in mobile wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 7, 20394–20403 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luo, X., Yang, J.: A survey on pollution monitoring using sensor networks in environment protection. J. Sensors 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Loscri, V., Morabito, G., Marano, S.: A two-levels hierarchy for low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (TL-LEACH). In: IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE, 1999, vol. 62, no. 3, p. 1809, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luo, H., Ye, F., Cheng, J., Lu, S., Zhang, L.: Ttdd: a two-tier data dissemination model for large-scale wireless sensor networks. J. Mobile Networks Appl. (MONET) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dixit, E., Jindal, V. (2022). The Comparison Analysis of Cluster and Non-cluster Based Routing Protocols for WAPMS (Wireless Air Pollution Monitoring System). In: Raj, J.S., Palanisamy, R., Perikos, I., Shi, Y. (eds) Intelligent Sustainable Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 213. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2422-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics