Skip to main content

Effect of Liquid Bridge Volume on Cohesive Sediment Motion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Thermal Engineering, Manufacturing, and Production Management (ICTEMA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

A little quantity of water addition between two spherical particles imparts great strength in mechanical behaviour of the particles and the soil as a whole. For the arrangement of the particle or grain “Truncated Pyramid Model (TPM)” has been considered. Pore pressure force, cohesive force, force due to weight of the grains and hydrostatic force have been considered here in TPM for fully submerged grains with both cases of water level rising and water level falling by varying inter-granular liquid bridge volume. Conservation of moment of momentum principle has been implemented for the quantification of escape velocity or separation speed of the grains in microscopic level, which is the main parameter for dislodging of the grain from the riverbank. The variation of the separation speed with the inter-granular distance has been plotted for three different liquid bridge volumes (10, 20, and 30 nl) and three different grain sizes (300, 400 and 500 μm of radius).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

R s :

Sediment grain radius (mm);

D s :

Inter-granular distance (mm);

V :

Inter-granular liquid bridge volume (nl);

α s :

Angular acceleration of grain (rad/s2);

P ws :

Pore water pressure (N/m2);

m s :

Mass of the spherical particle (kg);

m w :

Entrapped water mass (kg);

\(\varphi\) :

Contact angle (rad);

β :

Water content index angle (rad);

References

  1. El Kadi Abderrezzak K, Moran AD, Mosselman E, Bouchard JP, Habersack H, Aelbrecht D (2014) A physical, movable-bed model for non-uniform sediment transport, fluvial erosion and bank failure in rivers. J Hydro-environ Res 8(2):95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Odgaard AJ, Masconi CE (1987) Streambank protection by submerged vanes. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 113(4):520–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll RWH, Warwick JJ, James AI, Miller JR (2004) Modeling erosion and overbank deposition during extreme floods conditions on carson river Nevada. J Hydrol 297(1–4):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukherjee S, Mazumdar A (2010) Study of effect of the variation of inter-particle distance on the erodibility of a riverbank under cohesion with a new model. J Hydro-environ Res 4(3):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee S (2011) Application of Truncated Pyramid model in determination of escape velocity of particles of different diameters in varying conditions. Int J Soft Comput Eng (IJSCE) 1(5):75–79

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goncharov VN (1964) Dynamics of channel flow. Israel Programme for Scientific Translation, Moscow, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osman AM, Thorne CR (1988) Riverbank stability analysis I: theory. J Hydraul Eng 114(2):134–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darby SE, Thorne CR (1996) Stability analysis for steep, eroding, cohesive riverbanks. J Hydraul Eng 122:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tokaldany EA, Darby SE (2006) A model for stability analysis of a multi-layered river bank (SMALR). J Agric Sci Technol 8:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duan JG (2005) Analytical approach to calculate rate of bank erosion. J Hydraul Eng 131(11):980–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soulie F, Youssoufi EI, Cherblanc FMS, Saix C (2006) Capillary cohesion and mechanical strength of polydisperse granular materials. Eur Phys J E 21:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Likos JW, Lu N (2002) Hysteresis of capillary Cohesiom in unsaturated soils. In: 15th ASCE engineering mechanics conference, Columbia University, New York, NY, 2–5 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Biswas, D., Dutta, A., Mukherjee, S., Mazumdar, A. (2021). Effect of Liquid Bridge Volume on Cohesive Sediment Motion. In: Ghosh, S.K., Ghosh, K., Das, S., Dan, P.K., Kundu, A. (eds) Advances in Thermal Engineering, Manufacturing, and Production Management. ICTEMA 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2347-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2347-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2346-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2347-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics