Skip to main content

Strategic Organizational Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Augmenting Employee Trust and Cooperation

Abstract

This chapter explores how the decomposition of individual differences in personality provides theoretical and practical implications for employers. The key issues and findings of the causal relationship between excessive extrinsic rewards and cooperation are further examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the survey by PERSOLKELLY (2018), employees in Asia Pacific are found to be inclined towards individuality, chiefly due to the preference for reward based on individual contribution. The preference for individual recognition is similar for both contract and permanent full-time employees. Younger workers lead the trend toward a more personalized workforce.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcover, C.-M., Rico, R., Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2017). Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations: A multiple-foci exchange relationships approach and proposed framework. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616628333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, H. (1985). Task performance, perceived competence, and attributed causes of performance as determinants of intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 876. https://doi.org/10.2307/256242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audenaert, M., Carette, P., Shore, L. M., Lange, T., Van Waeyenberg, T., & Decramer, A. (2018). Leader-employee congruence of expected contributions in the employee-organization relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bareket-Bojmel, L., Hochman, G., & Ariely, D. (2017). It’s (not) all about the Jacksons: Testing different types of short-term bonuses in the field. Journal of Management, 43(2), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F. T., & Van Esch, E. (2016). A social exchange theory framework for understanding the job characteristics-job outcomes relationship: The mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(11), 1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1069752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. F., Wong, C. S., & Yuan, G. Y. (2017). Why mutual trust leads to highest performance: The mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(4), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D. A. (2015). Locus of control and the labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-014-0017-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Schurer, S. (2013). Two economists’ musings on the stability of locus of control. The Economic Journal, 123(570), F358–F400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Baer, M., Long, D., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. (2014). Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 599. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2012). The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02033.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., Guest, D., & Trenberth, L. (2011). Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corgnet, B., Gómez-Miñambres, J., & Hernán-González, R. (2015). Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Science, 61(12), 2926–2944. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Schminke, M., De Schutter, L., & Stouten, J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de La Torre-Ruiz, J. M., Vidal-Salazar, M. D., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2017). Benefit flexibility and benefit satisfaction: Does employee’s personality matter? Personnel Review, 46(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2015-0082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (E. Aronson & SpringerLink Eds.). Springer US: Imprint: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, M. L., Subramony, M. V., & Durik, A. M. (2014). The joint effects of climates for empowerment and rewards on organizational performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, H. K., Don, H., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1975). Congruence between individual needs, organizational climate, job satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward—Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.51.11.1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1007651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, B. M., Randel, A. E., Collins, B. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2018). Changing the focus of locus (of control): A targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2275.

  • Garbers, Y., & Konradt, U. (2014). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 102–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giarratana, M. S., Mariani, M., & Ingo, W. (2018). Rewards for patents and inventor behaviors in industrial research and development. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, J. W. (2000). Working hard for the money? Efficiency wages and worker effort. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(4), 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00008-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, I., & Urminsky, O. (2017). The dynamic effect of incentives on postreward task engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, R., & Conway, N. (2016). The undermining effect revisited: The salience of everyday verbal rewards and self-determined motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. S., Jirjahn, U., & Struewing, C. (2017). Locus of control and performance appraisal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovenkamp-Hermelink, J. H., Jeronimus, B. F., Spinhoven, P., Penninx, B. W., Schoevers, R. A., & Riese, H. (2019). Differential associations of locus of control with anxiety, depression and life-events: A five-wave, nine-year study to test stability and change. Journal of Affective Disorders, 253, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagonlar, G., Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2016). Reciprocation wary employees discount psychological contract fulfillment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, M. J., Snell, A. F., Robison, S. J., Svyantek, D. V., & Bott, J. (2004). Personality and situational pattern differences across three work groups: A comparative examination of worker personality and organizational climate using three pattern-extraction analyses. Organizational analysis, 12(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Késenne, S. (2006). The win maximization model reconsidered: Flexible talent supply and efficiency wages. Journal of Sports Economics, 7(4), 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Efficiency wages and the inter-industry wage structure. Econometrica, 56(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. S. (2011). Promised and delivered inducements and contributions: An integrated view of psychological contract appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. S., Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: A comparison of traditional and expanded views. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 895–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00244.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, H., Jiang, Z., Fujimoto, Y., & Nielsen, I. (2018). Inclusion and affective well-being: Roles of justice perceptions. Personnel Review, 47(4), 805–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. (2014). Locus of control: Current trends in theory & research. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (2015). The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, D., Prasad, K., & Salmon, T. (2014). Deferred compensation vs. efficiency wages: An experimental test of effort provision and self-selection. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestri, L. (2012). Bonus payments versus efficiency wages in the repeated principal-agent model with subjective evaluations. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(3), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.3.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes, S. D., & Irving, P. G. (2008). Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: Relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. (2009). Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulki, J., & Lassk, F. G. (2019). Joint impact of ethical climate and external work locus of control on job meaningfulness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonnaya, C., Daniels, K., & Nielsen, K. (2017). Does contingent pay encourage positive employee attitudes and intensify work? Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PERSOLKELLY. (2018). Personalised workforce: The individual vs the team. https://www.kellyservices.com.sg/media/kelly-services-sg/client/APAC_Report/2018%20-%20Q3/PERSOLKELLY%202018%20APAC%20Workforce%20Insights%20Survey%20-%20Q3.pdf.

  • Phillips, J., & Lord, R. (1980). Determinants of intrinsic motivation: Locus of control and competence information as components of Deci’s cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.2.211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., Pearce, J. L., Tripoli, A. M., & Lewis, K. M. (1998). Differential perceptions of employers’ inducements: Implications for psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 769–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, D. M. G., & Summers, L. H. (1987). Did Henry Ford pay efficiency wages? Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4, Part 2), S57–S86. https://doi.org/10.1086/298165.

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/256773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Research edge: Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 18(1), 120–127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166046.

  • Schnitzlein, D. D., & Stephani, J. (2016). Locus of control and low-wage mobility. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., & Barksdale, K. (1998). Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, O. N., Hofmans, J., Bal, P. M., & Jansen, P. G. W. (2016). Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Lima, M., Michel, J. W., & Caetano, A. (2013). Clarifying the importance of trust in organizations as a component of effective work relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. (2014). Efficiency wages: Models of unemployment, layoffs, and wage dispersion (Vol. 1192): Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. J., Beckman, H., & Baker, E. (2012). Financial incentives, professional values and performance: A study of pay-for-performance in a professional organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 964–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei O. J. Kwok .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kwok, A.O.J., Watabe, M., Ahmed, P.K. (2021). Strategic Organizational Decision-Making. In: Augmenting Employee Trust and Cooperation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2343-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics