Skip to main content

Sustainability Indicators for Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent: A Case Study in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Architecture and Building Environment

Abstract

The sustainability assessment of the biogas production from palm oil mill effluent is complex, so it requires indicators that represent the sustainability concept of the system. This study aims to determine sustainability indicators of the biogas production system from palm oil mill effluent using the participatory analytic hierarchy process. This study results in ten sustainability indicators, in order of importance, consisting of the availability of raw material, profitability, greenhouse gases emissions, energy efficiency, water usage, production cost, investment, installed capacity, residents benefits, and job creation. These indicators help evaluate the sustainability of the biogas production system from palm oil mill effluent in the Bangka Belitung Islands and other regions in Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BPS (2020) Statistik Daerah Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung, Tahun 2020. BPS Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung, Pangkalpinang

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sala S, Ciuffo B, Nijkamp P (2015) A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 119:314–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Afgan NH, Carvalho MG, Hovanov NV (2000) Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy 28(9):603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu G (2014) Development of a general sustainability indicator for renewable energy systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hák T, Moldan B, Dahl AL (2007) Sustainability indicators: a scientific assessment. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campos-Guzmán V, García-Cáscales MS, Espinosa et al N (2019) Life cycle analysis with multi-criteria decision making: a review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 104:343–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF et al (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) Pilot testing of GBEP sustainability indicators for bioenergy in Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hambali E, Papilo P, Arkeman Y et al (2017) Indonesian sustainability bioenergy indicators, first edit. IPB Press, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papilo P, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS (2018) Sustainability index assessment of palm oil-based bioenergy in Indonesia. J Clean Prod 196:808–820

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar A et al (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69(November 2016):596–609

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2009) Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(5):1082–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghenai C, Albawab M, Bettayeb M (2020) Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renew Energy 146:580–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Padilla-Rivera A, Paredes MG, Güereca LP (2019) A systematic review of the sustainability assessment of bioenergy: the case of gaseous biofuels. Biomass Bioenergy 125(October 2018):79–94

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller GT, Spoolman SE (2016) Environmental science, fifteenth. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dale VH, Kline KL, Richard TL et al (2018) Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement. Biomass Bioenerg 114:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cîrstea SD, Moldovan-Teselios C, Cîrstea A et al (2018) Evaluating renewable energy sustainability by composite index. Sustain 10(3)

    Google Scholar 

  21. García-Álvarez MT, Moreno B, Soares I (2016) Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synthetic index. Ecol Indic 60(2016):996–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kemmler A, Spreng D (2007) Energy indicators for tracking sustainability in developing countries. Energy Policy 35(4):2466–2480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nzila C, Dewulf J, Spanjers H et al (2012) Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya. Appl Energy 93:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oyedepo SO (2012) On energy for sustainable development in Nigeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):2583–2598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riti JS, Shu Y (2016) Renewable energy, energy efficiency, and eco-friendly environment (R-E5) in Nigeria. Energy Sustain Soc 6(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude for the financial support from the International Indexed Publication Grant (Hibah PUTI) Universitas Indonesia (contract number: NKB-2578/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020) and the Provincial Government of Bangka Belitung Islands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tri Edhi Budhi Soesilo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Septriana, F.E., Soesilo, T.E.B., Sodri, A. (2022). Sustainability Indicators for Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent: A Case Study in Indonesia. In: Yola, L., Nangkula, U., Ayegbusi, O.G., Awang, M. (eds) Sustainable Architecture and Building Environment . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 161. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2329-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2329-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2328-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2329-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics