Skip to main content

Urban Fortification and the Contestation of Space: A Case Study in Kayu Putih Housing Complex

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Architecture and Building Environment

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 161))

  • 532 Accesses

Abstract

Since the tragedy of May 1998 riot in Jakarta, there have been attempts by the community to protect themselves and their properties. The efforts to add protections are achieved through fortification of the area where they live, so that it is closed and difficult to access for outsiders other than the residents. This fortification effort is against the 21st principle of The Charter of New Urbanism that encourages urban areas to be more open, letting cities become friendly places for people, inclusive, and more enliven. This principle aims to create a more dynamic contestation [1] in urban spaces as an effort to improve the livelihood of the city residents, and yet fortification as a protective effort is contradicting the very principle. The Kayu Putih area is chosen as the study area because the author has been part of the residents of the area and witness the development of the fortifications from May 1998 incident up till now, the period of Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study reviews how the fortifications affect the contestation of spaces [2] within the urban setting, and sees its impact on its society [3]. This research uses qualitative method by carrying out field surveys ethnographically in order to access the phenomena and see the impacts that come up. In addition, supporting questionnaires are used to see residents’ opinions on fortification, spatial use patterns, and the impact of fortification from time to time on their daily activities and towards the urban space. This study found interesting patterns, especially on the surrounding gates, which became sort of fortresses of the compound/area. Even though the gates closed or have limited access, its existence opens other opportunities for activities, which will not appear if the gates remain open. This research hopefully helps urban designers to consider the expected security [4], as well as the social aspects of fortification and its openness, so that there would be balances between the fortification effort and the contestation of its urban space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Contestation (2011) In: Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved 20 Oct 2020, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contestation

  2. Featherstone D, Korf B (2012) Introduction: space, contestation and the political. Geoforum 43:663–668 (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Next Generation of New Urbanist (2011) Tactical urbanism

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccato V (2012) The urban fabric of crime and fear. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen NM (Apr 1973) Urbanism and regional disparities in developed countries. Rev Soc Econ 31(1):54–65, Taylor & Francis. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29768677. Accessed on 29 Apr 2014 (03:37)

  6. Duany A, Plater-Zybrek E (1999) The Lexicon of the new urbanism. DPZ, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wirth L (Jul 1938) Urbanism as a way of life. Am J Sociol 44(1):1–24, The University of Chicago Press. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9602%28193807%2944%3A1%3C1%3AUAAWOL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B

  8. Dikeç M (2012) Space as a mode of political thinking. Geoforum 43:669–676 (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watson S (2006) City publics: the (dis)enchantments of urban encounters: questioning cities

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor RA (Mar 1995) Indigenous urbanism: class, city and society in southeast Asia. J SE Asian Stud 26(1):30–45, Perspectives on Southeast Asian Studies. Cambridge University Press on behalf of Department of History, National University of Singapore. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20071699. Accessed on 22 May 2014 (04:21)

  11. Pløger J (2008) Foucault’s Dispositif and the city, Roskilde University, Denmark, plo@ruc.dk

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark D (Jan 2000) World urban development: processes and patterns at the end of the twentieth century. Geography 85(1):15–23, Geographical Association. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40573371, Accessed on 29 Apr 2014 05:38

  13. Borden I (2000) The unknown city, contesting architecture and social space. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Karp DA, Stone GP, Yoels WC (Summer 1992) Being urban: a sociology of city life, symbolic interaction, 15(2):245–246, Review by: Reitzes, DC, Wiley on behalf of the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.1992.15.2.245. Accessed on 05 June 2014 (00:18)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was prepared authors and funded by Universitas Indonesia through PUTI 2020 Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trisnawan, D., Muhamad Rifki Ramadhan, W., Sihombing, A., Fuad, A.H. (2022). Urban Fortification and the Contestation of Space: A Case Study in Kayu Putih Housing Complex. In: Yola, L., Nangkula, U., Ayegbusi, O.G., Awang, M. (eds) Sustainable Architecture and Building Environment . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 161. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2329-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2329-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2328-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2329-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics