Skip to main content

Comparison of Copper and Tungsten Electrodes for the Electric Discharge Machined SUS-316L

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Machining Strategies for Better Performance

Abstract

The present work reported the performance assessment of two electrodes, namely copper and tungsten for the electric discharge machining of SUS-316L. The experimental work was performed according to Taguchi’s methodology of orthogonal array considering electrode, current, pulse-on time, pulse-off time as input parameters. Three output responses, i.e., material removal rate, surface roughness, and microhardness were opted for deciding the significance of input parameters on the machined surface. Furthermore, each response was statistically validated using analysis of variance for investing the dominating factors. It was revealed that the current and electrode were the most significant factors affecting all the three responses. For material removal rate, current 28 A (contribution: 55.58%) and copper as electrode material (contribution: 33.92%) noted as significant factors. The roughness of the electric discharge machined surface directly relates to the intensity of spark generated within the working area. Similar findings were observed in the study, current (contribution: 43.29%), pulse-on time (contribution: 19.06%), and electrode (contribution: 13.60%) were the factors which majorly contribute to the roughness of the machined surface. However, tungsten electrode noted as prominent affecting the microhardness of the machined SUS-316L surface. The sample machined at 28 A of current, pulse-on time 90 µs, and pulse-off time 60 µs exhibits the utmost microhardness value with a maximum contribution by current (contribution: 47.84%), followed by electrode type (contribution: 28.92%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(13):1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar S, Singh R, Singh TP, Sethi BL (2009) Surface modification by electrical discharge machining: a review. J Mater Process Technol 209(8):3675–3687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh G, Sidhu SS, Bains PS, Bhui AS (2019) Surface evaluation of ED machined 316L stainless steel in TiO2 nano-powder mixed dielectric medium. Mater Today Proc 18(3):1297–1303

    Google Scholar 

  4. Srivastava V, Pandey PM (2013) Study of ultrasonic assisted cryogenically cooled EDM process using sintered (Cu–TiC) tooltip. J Manuf Process 15(1):158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahajan A, Sidhu SS, Devgan S (2020) MRR and surface morphological analysis of electrical-discharge-machined Co–Cr alloy. Emerg Mater Res 9(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhui AS, Singh G, Sidhu SS, Bains PS (2018) Experimental investigation of optimal ED machining parameters for Ti-6Al-4V biomaterial. FU Series: Mech Eng 16(3):337–345

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guu YH, Hocheng H, Chou CY, Deng CS (2003) Effect of electrical discharge machining on surface characteristics and machining damage of AISI D2 tool steel. Mater Sci Eng A 358(1–2):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das MK, Kumar K, Barman TK, Sahoo P (2014) Application of artificial bee colony algorithm for optimization of MRR and surface roughness in EDM of EN31 tool steel. Procedia Mater Sci 6:741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharif S, Safiei W, Mansor AF, Isa MHM, Saad RM (2015) Experimental study of electrical discharge machine on stainless steel 316L using design of experiment. Procedia Manuf 2:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Devgan S, Sidhu SS (2019) Evolution of surface modification trends in bone related biomaterials: a review. Mater Chem Phys 233:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahajan A, Sidhu SS (2018) Surface modification of metallic biomaterials for enhanced functionality: a review. Mater Technol 33(2):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh G, Sidhu SS, Bains PS, Singh M, Bhui AS (2020) On surface modification of Ti alloy by electro discharge coating using hydroxyapatite powder mixed dielectric with graphite tool. J Bio- Tribo-Corros 6(3):91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pant P, Bharti PS (2020) Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) of nickel-based nimonic alloys: a review. Mater Today: Proc 25:765–772

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahajan A, Sidhu SS (2020) Devgan, S: Examination of hemocompatibility and corrosion resistance of electrical discharge-treated duplex stainless steel (DSS-2205) for biomedical applications. Appl Phys A 126:737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Amin M, Abdul Rani AM, Abdu Aliyu AA, Abdul Razak MAH, Hastuty S, Bryant MG (2020) Powder mixed-EDM for potential biomedical applications: a critical review. Mater Manuf Process 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh G, Sidhu SS, Bains PS, Bhui AS (2019) Improving microhardness and wear resistance of 316L by TiO2 powder mixed electro-discharge treatment. Mater Res Exp 6(8):086501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahajan A, Sidhu SS (2019) Potential of electrical discharge treatment to enhance the in vitro cytocompatibility and tribological performance of Co–Cr implant. J Mater Res 34(16):2837–2847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh G, Ablyaz TR, Shlykov ES, Muratov KR, Bhui AS, Sidhu SS (2020) Enhancing corrosion and wear resistance of Ti6Al4V alloy using CNTs Mixed electro-discharge process. Micromachines 11(9):850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Devgan S, Sidhu SS (2020) Surface modification of β-type titanium with multi-walled CNTs/μ-HAp powder mixed electro discharge treatment process. Mater Chem Phys 239:122005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, G., Mahajan, A., Devgan, S., Sidhu, S.S. (2022). Comparison of Copper and Tungsten Electrodes for the Electric Discharge Machined SUS-316L. In: Srinivasa Pai, P., Krishnaraj, V. (eds) Sustainable Machining Strategies for Better Performance. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2278-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2278-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2277-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2278-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics