Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Residual Life Prediction and Optimal Maintenance Decision for a Piece of Equipment

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

With the high-tech development and increasing global competitions, the modern industrialization process intends to be more and more extensive and complex

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhou D, Ye Y (2000) Modern fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Transportation Safety Board (1999) Uncontrolled Descent and Collision with Tarrain USAir Flight 427 Boeing 737-300, N513AU Near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, September, 1994: Aircraft Accident Report, A850073. National Technical Information Service, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhengguo Xu (2008) Real-time prediction method of dynamic system reliability. Tsinghua University, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chu C, Proth JM, Wolff P (1998) Predictive maintenance: the one-unit replacement model. Int J Prod Econ 54(3):285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mobley RK (2002) An introduction to predictive maintenance. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shao X, Cao L, Tian G et al (2013) Prognostic and health management technology for complex equipment. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cui LR, Loh HT, Xie M (2004) Sequential inspection strategy for multiple systems under availability requirement. Eur J Oper Res 155:170–177

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J, Ni J, Djurdjanovic D et al (2006) Intelligent prognostics and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57:476–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang W (2007) A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 182:1177–1187

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W (2007) A prognosis model for wear prediction based oil-based monitoring. J Oper Res Soc 58:887–893

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Zhang W (2008) An asset residual life prediction model based on expert judgments. Eur J Oper Res 188:496–505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Si XS, Wang W, Hu CH et al (2011) Remaining useful life estimation—a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res 213:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu CH, Zhou ZJ, Zhang JX et al (2015) A survey on life prediction of equipment. Chin J Aeronaut 28(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka K, Mura T (1981) A dislocation model for fatigue crack initiation. J Appl Mech 48(1):97–103

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mou Y, Shan Lu (2013) Numerical simulation of Fatigue-crack-initiation life for turbine disk based on material microcosmic characteristics. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 34(2):282–290

    Google Scholar 

  17. CALCE Electronic Products and Systems Center (2006) Reliability prediction of electronic parts and products. University of Maryland, College Park (MD). Report No.: MD20742

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Xie W, Zeng S (2008) Functional analysis and physics of failure associated reliability prediction. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 29(5):1133–1138

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang CH, Wen XS, Chen X (2004) A comprehensive review of accelerated life testing. Acta Armamentarii 25(4):485–490

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan W (1997) Application of environmental factor method in ammunition storage reliability evaluation. J Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance 3:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hong D, Xiaobing M, Zhao Y et al (2010) Environment referring factor based on proportional hazards model. J Beijing Univer Aeronaut Astronaut 36(4):443–446

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall AW, Olkin I (2007) Life distributions. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu CJ, Meeker WQ (1993) Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution. Technometrics 35(2):161–174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu JC, Park J, Yang Q (1997) Statistical inference of a time-to-failure distribution derived from linear degradation data. Technometrics 39(4):391–400

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Tseng ST, Tang J, Ku IH (2003) Determination of burn-in parameters and residual life for highly reliable products. Nav Res Logist 50(1):1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang W (2000) A model to determine the optimal critical level and the monitoring intervals in condition-based maintenance. Int J Prod Res 38(6):1425–1436

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bae SJ, Kvam PH (2004) A nonlinear random-coefficients model for degradation testing. Technometrics 46(4):460–469

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gebraeel NZ, Lawley MA, Li R et al (2005) Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: a Bayesian approach. IIE Trans 37(6):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elwany A, Gebraeel N (2009) Real-time estimation of mean remaining life using sensor-based degradation models. J Manuf Sci Eng 131(5). 051005-1-051005-9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gebraeel N, Pan J (2008) Prognostic degradation models for computing and updating residual life distributions in a time-varying environment. Reliab, IEEE Trans 57(4):539–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gebraeel N (2006) Sensory-updated residual life distributions for components with exponential degradation patterns. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 3(4):382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Park JI, Bae SJ (2010) Direct prediction methods on lifetime distribution of organic light-emitting diodes from accelerated degradation tests. IEEE Trans Reliab 59(1):74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdel-Hameed M (1975) A Gamma wear process. IEEE Trans Reliab 24(2):152–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang W, Christer AH (2000) Towards a general condition based maintenance model for a stochastic dynamic system. J Oper Res Soc 51:145–155

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Bagdonavicius V, Nikulin MS (2001) Estimation in degradation models with explanatory variables. Lifetime Data Anal 7(1):85–103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Lawless J, Crowder M (2004) Covariates and random effects in a Gamma process model with application to degradation and failure. Lifetime Data Anal 10(3):213–227

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Noortwijk JM (2009) A survey of the application of Gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wasan MT (1968) On an inverse Gaussian process. Scand Actuar J 1968(1–2):69–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Xu D (2010) An inverse Gaussian process model for degradation data. Technometrics 52(2):188–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Kharoufeh JP (2003) Explicit results for wear processes in a Markovian environment. Oper Res Lett 31(3):237–244

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Kharoufeh JP, Sipe JA (2005) Evaluating failure time probabilities for a Markovian wear process. Comput Oper Res 32(5):1131–1145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Kharoufeh JP, Mixon DG (2009) On a Markov-modulated shock and wear process. Nav Res Logistics (NRL) 56(6):563–576

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Kharoufeh JP, Cox SM, Oxley ME (2013) Reliability of manufacturing equipment in complex environments. Ann Oper Res 209(1):1–24

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee MLT, Whitmore GA, Rosner BA (2010) Threshold regression for survival data with time-varying covariates. Stat Med 29(7–8):896–905

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang W (2007) A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 182(3):1177–1187

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang W, Zhang W (2008) An asset residual life prediction model-based on expert judgments. Eur J Oper Res 188(2):496–505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 34(2):187–220

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Jardine AKS, Banjevic D, Montgomery N et al (2008) Repairable system reliability: recent developments in CBM optimization. Int J Performability Eng 4(3):205–214

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bunks C, McCarthy D, AL-Ani T (2000) Condition-based maintenance of machines using hidden Markov models. Mech Syst Signal Proc 14(4):597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Baruah P, Chinnam RB (2005) HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. Int J Prod Res 43(6):1275–1293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Dong M, He D (2007) Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis. Eur J Oper Res 178(3):858–878

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Dong M, He D (2007) A segmental hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)-based diagnostics and prognostics framework and methodology. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(5):2248–2266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu Q, Dong M, Peng Y (2012) A novel method for online health prognosis of equipment based on hidden semi-Markov model using sequential Monte Carlo methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 32:331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pettit LI, Young KDS (1999) Bayesian analysis for inverse Gaussian lifetime data with measures of degradation. J Stat Comput Simul 63(3):217–234

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee MY, Tang J (2007) A modified EM-algorithm for estimating the parameters of inverse Gaussian distribution based on time censored Wiener degradation data. Stat Sin 17(3):873–893

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Malik, DF (1976) Storage reliability of missile material program: storage analysis summary report. Raytheon Company, Huntsville al life cycle analysis group. Report No.: ADA026275.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hou X (1997) Summary of foreign missile storage reliability techniques. Qual Reliab 4:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  58. van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA, Fornell GE et al (1996) A Bayes approach to step-stress accelerated life testing. IEEE Trans Reliab 45(3):491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou X, Yao J, Zhang J (2012) Dirichlet analysis method for the accelerated storage test of electronic machine. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 33(7):1305–1311

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nelson W (1981) Analysis of performance-degradation data from accelerated tests. IEEE Trans Reliab 30(2):149–155

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Padgett WJ, Tomlinson MA (2004) Inference from accelerated degradation and failure data based on Gaussian process models. Lifetime Data Anal 10(2):191–206

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. State Bureau of Technical Supervision (1994) GB/T3187–94 Reliability and maintainability terms. Standards Press of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  63. Stephens M (2004) Productivity and reliability-based maintenance management. Purdue University Press, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  64. Heng A, Zhang S, Tan A et al (2009) Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):724–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang J (2004) Study on maintenance scheduling of generating units in the electricity market environment. China Agric Univ, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  66. Christer A (1999) Developments in delay time analysis for modelling plant maintenance. J Oper Res Soc 50(11):1120–1137

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang Y (2001) Equipment management and maintenance in German enterprises. China Plant Eng 12:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bevilacqua M, Braglia M (2000) The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance policy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 70(1):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ghasemi A, Yacout S, Ouali M (2007) Optimal condition based maintenance with imperfect information and the proportional hazards model. Int J Prod Res 45(4):989–1012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Lianghua X, Xisheng J, Yuli L (2006) Development trend and characteristics of CBM System. In: Zhixin W, Min Z (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on maintenance engineering. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  71. Chen X (2003) Modern maintenance theory. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  72. Morse P (1958) Queues, inventories and maintenance. Iohn Wiley & Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Barlow R, Hunter L (1960) Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Oper Res 8(1):90–100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Barlow R, Proschan F (1965) Mathematical theory of reliability. Wiley & Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Nakagawa T (1979) Optimum policies when preventive maintenance is imperfect. IEEE Trans Reliab 28(4):331–332

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Valdez-Flores C, Feldman R (1989) A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Nav Res Logist 36(4):419–446

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Pham H, Wang H (1996) Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94(3):425–438

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Scarf P, Cavalcante C, Dwight R et al (2009) An age-based inspection and replacement policy for heterogeneous items. IEEE Trans Reliab 58(4):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Berg M, Epstein B (1976) A modified block replacement policy. Nav Res Logistics Q 23(1):15–24

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Tango T (1978) Extended block replacement policy with used items. J Appl Probab 15(3):560–572

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Brezavscek A, Hudoklin A (2003) Joint optimization of block-replacement and periodic-review spare-provisioning policy. IEEE Trans Reliab 52(1):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Huang R, Meng L, Xi L et al (2008) Modeling and analyzing a joint optimization policy of block-replacement and spare inventory with random-leadtime. IEEE Trans Reliab 57(1):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Nakagawa T (1980) A summary of imperfect preventive maintenance policies with minimal repair. RAIRO Oper Res 14(3):249–255

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Nakagawa T (1981) A summary of periodic replacement with minimal repair at failure. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 24(3):213–227

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Nakagawa T (1981) Modified periodic replacement with minimal repair at failure. IEEE Trans Reliab 30(2):165–168

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Chun Y (1992) Optimal number of periodic preventive maintenance operations under warranty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 37(3):223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang H, Pham H (1999) Some maintenance models and availability with imperfect maintenance in production systems. Ann Oper Res 91:305–318

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Bergman B (1978) Optimal replacement under a general failure model. Adv Appl Probab 10(2):431–451

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Jayabalan V, Chaudhuri D (1992) Cost optimization of maintenance scheduling for a system with assured reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 41(1):21–25

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Jayabalan V, Chaudhuri D (2006) Optimal maintenance and replacement policy for a deteriorating system with increased mean downtime. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 39(1):67–78

    Google Scholar 

  91. Lie C, Chun Y (1986) An algorithm for preventive maintenance policy. IEEE Trans Reliab 35(1):71–75

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Lin D, Zuo M, Yam R (2001) Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes. Nav Res Logist 48(2):172–183

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Barlow R, Proschan F (1962) Planned replacement. In: Arrow KJ (ed) Studies in applied probability and management science. Stanford University Press, California, pp 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  94. Nakagawa T (1986) Periodic and sequential preventive maintenance policies. J Appl Probab 23(2):536–542

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Nakagawa T (1988) Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policies. IEEE Trans Reliab 37(3):295–298

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. Beichelt F (1982) A replacement policy based on limits for the repair cost rate. IEEE Trans Reliab 31(4):401–403

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Yun W, Bai D (1988) Repair cost limit replacement policy under imperfect inspection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 23(1):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Nakagawa T, Osaki S (1974) The optimum repair limit replacement policies. Operational Research Quarterly (1970–1977) 25(2):311–317

    Google Scholar 

  99. Jardine A, Makis V, Banjevic D et al (1998) A decision optimization model for condition-based maintenance. J Qual Maint Eng 4(2):115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Vlok P, Coetzee J, Banjevic D et al (2002) Optimal component replacement decisions using vibration monitoring and the proportional-hazards model. J Oper Res Soc 53(2):193–202

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Samrout M, Chatelet E, Kouta R et al (2009) Optimization of maintenance policy using the proportional hazard model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ma L, Mathew J, Sun Y et al (2006) Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(5):1189–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Grall A, Bérenguer C, Dieulle L (2002) A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76(2):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Grall A, Dieulle L, Bérenguer C et al (2002) Continuous-time predictivemaintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans Reliab 51(2):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Castanier B, Bérenguer C, Grall A (2003) A sequential condition-based repair/replacement policy with non-periodic inspections for a system subject to continuous wear. Appl Stochastic Models Data Anal 19(4):327–347

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. Dieulle L, Berenguer C, Grall A et al (2003) Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. Eur J Oper Res 150(2):451–461

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  107. Liao H, Elsayed E, Chan L (2006) Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems. Eur J Oper Res 175(2):821–835

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  108. Monplaisir M, Arumugadasan N (1994) Maintenance decision support: analysing crankcase lubricant condition by Markov process modelling. J Oper Res Soc 45(5):509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Amari S, Mclaughlin L (2004) Optimal design of a condition-based maintenance model. In: Reliability and maintainability, 2004 annual symposium-RAMS. IEEE, Los Angeles, CA, USA. New York, pp 528–533

    Google Scholar 

  110. Chen D, Trivedi K (2005) Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90(1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Wijnmalen D, Hontelez J (1997) Coordinated condition-based repair strategies for components of a multi-component maintenance system with discounts. Eur J Oper Res 98(1):52–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Glazebrook K, Mitchell H, Ansell P (2005) Index policies for the maintenance of a collection of machines by a set of repairmen. Eur J Oper Res 165(1):267–284

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  113. Zhou D, Zhengguo Xu (2008) Real-time reliability evaluation and prediction techniques for engineering systems. Aerosp Control Appl 34(4):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  114. Barata J, Soares C, Marseguerra M et al (2002) Simulation modelling of repairable multi-component deteriorating systems for‘on condition’maintenance optimisation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Wang L (2006) Research on the theory and application of maintenance decision model and method. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  116. Christer A, Wang W, Sharp J (1997) A state space condition monitoring model for furnace erosion prediction and replacement. Eur J Oper Res 101(1):1–14

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. Lu S, Tu Y, Lu H (2007) Predictive condition-based maintenance for continuously deteriorating systems. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Cadini F, Zio E, Avram D (2009) Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(3):752–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Kaiser K, Gebraeel N (2009) Predictive maintenance management using sensor-based degradation models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 39(4):840–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Elwany A, Gebraeel N (2008) Sensor-driven prognostic models for equipment replacement and spare parts inventory. IIE Trans 40(7):629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Li L, Asme M, You M et al (2009) Reliability-based dynamic maintenance threshold for failure prevention of continuously monitored degrading systems. J Manuf Sci Eng 131(3):1010–1018

    Google Scholar 

  122. Sun J, Li L, Xi L (2012) Modified two-Stage degradation model for dynamic maintenance threshold calculation considering uncertainty. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 9(1):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Zhou X, Xi L, Lee J (2007) Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(4):530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. You MY, Li L, Meng G et al (2010) Cost-effective updated sequential predictive maintenance policy for continuously monitored degrading systems. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 7(2):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Djurdjanovic D, Lee J, Ni J (2003) Watchdog agent—an infotronics-based prognostics approach for product performance degradation assessment and prediction. Adv Eng Inform 17(3–4):109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Elwany A, Gebraeel N, Maillart L (2011) Structured replacement policies for components with complex degradation processes and dedicated sensors. Oper Res 59(3):684

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  127. Thomas L (1986) A survey of maintenance and replacement models for maintainability and reliability of multi-item systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 16(4):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Nicolai R, Dekker R (2008) Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: a review. Comp Syst Maintenance Handb 263–286

    Google Scholar 

  129. Okumoto K, Elsayed E (1983) An optimum group maintenance policy. Nav Res Logistics Q 30(4):667–674

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  130. Assaf D, Shanthikumar J (1987) Optimal group maintenance policies with continuous and periodic inspections. Manage Sci 33(11):1440–1452

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  131. Ritchken P, Wilson J (1990) (m, T) group maintenance policies. Manage Sci 36(5):632–639

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  132. Sheu S, Jhang J (1997) A generalized group maintenance policy. Eur J Oper Res 96(2):232–247

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  133. Heidergott B, Farenhorst-Yuan T (2010) Gradient estimation for multicomponent maintenance systems with age-replacement policy. Oper Res 58(3):706–718

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  134. Dekkert R, Smit A, Losekoot J (1992) Combining maintenance activities in an operational planning phase: a set-partitioning approach. IMA J Math Appl Bus Ind 3(4):315–331

    Google Scholar 

  135. Dekker R, Wildeman R, Van Egmond R (1996) Joint replacement in an operational planning phase. Eur J Oper Res 91(1):74–88

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  136. Wildeman R, Dekker R, Smit A (1997) A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities. Eur J Oper Res 99(3):530–551

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  137. Wildeman R (1996) The art of grouping maintenance. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  138. Jorgenson D, Mccall J, Radner R (1967) Optimal replacement policies for a ballistic missile. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  139. Berg M (1976) Optimal replacement policies for two-unit machines with increasing running costs: I. Stoch Process Appl 4(1):89–106

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  140. Berg M (1977) Optimal replacement policies for two-unit machines with running costs: II. Stoch Process Appl 5(3):315–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  141. Zheng X, Fard N (1991) A maintenance policy for repairable systems based on opportunistic failure-rate tolerance. IEEE Trans Reliab 40(2):237–244

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  142. Tian Z, Liao H (2011) Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(5):581–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Cheng Z, Guo Bo (2007) The optimal analysis of opportunistic maintenance model of multi-components system. Ind Eng J 10(5):66–69

    Google Scholar 

  144. Hou W, Jiang Z, Jin Y (2008) An opportunistic maintenance model considering risk. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Chin Ed) 42(7):1095–1099

    Google Scholar 

  145. Chen Y, Jin J, Huang Z (2009) Study on opportunity maintenance policy of equipment outside nuclear island based on operational availability. Nucl Power Eng 30(6):108–111

    Google Scholar 

  146. Dekker R, Smeitink E (1991) Opportunity-based block replacement. Eur J Oper Res 53(1):46–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  147. Dekker R, Dijkstra M (1992) Opportunity-based age replacement: exponentially distributed times between opportunities. Nav Res Logist 39(2):175–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  148. Dagpunar J (1996) A maintenance model with opportunities and interrupt replacement options. J Oper Res Soc 47(11):1406–1409

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  149. Camci F (2009) System maintenance scheduling with prognostics information using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Reliab 58(3):1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  150. Murthy DNP, Nguyen DG (1985) Study of two-component system with failure interaction. Nav Res Logist Q 32(2):239–247

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  151. Scarf PA, Deara M (1998) On the development and application of maintenance policies for a two-component system with failure dependence. IMA J Manag Math 9(2):91–107

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  152. Scarf PA, Deara M (2002) Block replacement policies for a two-component system with failure dependence. Nav Res Logist 50(1):70–87

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  153. Nakagawa T, Murthy DNP (1993) Optimal replacement policies for a two unit system with failure interactions. RAIRO. Recherche Opérationnelle 27(4):427–438

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  154. Lai M T, chen Y C. Optimal periodic replacement policy for a two-unit system with failure rate interaction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 29(3):367–371.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Castro I (2009) A model of imperfect preventive maintenance with dependent failure modes. Eur J Oper Res 196(1):217–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xi’an Research Institute of High-Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Changhua Hu

  2. Xi’an Research Institute of High-Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Hongdong Fan

  3. Xi’an Research Institute of High-Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Zhaoqiang Wang

Authors
  1. Changhua Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongdong Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaoqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 National Defense Industry Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hu, C., Fan, H., Wang, Z. (2022). Introduction. In: Residual Life Prediction and Optimal Maintenance Decision for a Piece of Equipment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2267-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2267-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2266-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2267-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation