Abstract
Humans have a strong sense of fairness and are usually averse to unequal treatment for the same action. Ever since Brosnan and de Waal showed a similar effect in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), numerous studies using different experimental methods have been conducted to investigate whether animals show inequity aversion like humans do. Capuchin monkeys have become one of the best-studied animals in this area. Our first aim in this chapter was to synthesise the findings in this literature. We found that there is mixed evidence for inequity aversion in capuchin monkeys. Our second aim was to understand this variation by focusing on the following factors: the type of task used, the feeding regime outside the experiment and the monkeys’ social environment. To obtain data on some of these factors, as they are not always reported in published studies, we contacted researchers in the main laboratories conducting this work. We found that responses to inequity systematically varied as a function of the task demands and the feeding regime, but not the social environment. Tasks, in particular pulling tasks, that required participants to expend effort to get the food were more likely to detect evidence of inequity aversion. Moreover, monkeys with access to food before or after testing, were more likely to show inequity aversion than those whose access to food was temporarily restricted. We note that our survey is an explorative approach to investigate the variation in reports on inequity aversion in capuchin monkeys. We hope this chapter raises awareness of the complexity of the concept and generates new testable hypotheses, which might advance our understanding of the theoretical foundations of inequity aversion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amici F, Call J, Aureli F (2012) Aversion to violation of expectations of food distribution: the role of social tolerance and relative dominance in seven primate species. Behaviour 149(3–4):345–368. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853912X637833
Amici F, Visalberghi E, Call J (2014) Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281(1793):20141699. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1699
André JB, Baumard N (2011) The evolution of fairness in a biological market. Evolution 65(5):1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01232.x
Anselme P, Dreher T, Güntürkün O (2018) Pigeons consistently prefer easy over harder access to food: no reversal after direct dopaminergic stimulation. Behav Neurosci 132(4):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000249
Barbano MF, Cador M (2005) Various aspects of feeding behavior can be partially dissociated in the rat by the incentive properties of food and the physiological state. Behav Neurosci 119(5):1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.119.5.1244
Blake PR, McAuliffe K, Corbit J, Callaghan TC, Barry O, Bowie A et al (2015) The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature 528:258–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15703
Bowie A (2013) The development of inequality aversion in Ugandan children (BSc thesis, Harvard University). doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Are apes really inequity averse? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273(1605):3123–3128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3693
Bräuer J, Hanus D (2012) Fairness in non-human primates? Soc Justice Res 25(3):256–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0159-6
Bremhorst A, Bütler S, Würbel H, Riemer S (2018) Incentive motivation in pet dogs - preference for constant vs varied food rewards. Sci Rep 8:9756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28079-5
Brosnan SF (2011) A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity. Front Neurosci 5:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00043
Brosnan SF (2013) Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:10416–10423. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301194110
Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425(6955):297–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01963
Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2014) Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science 346(6207):1251776. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251776
Brosnan SF, Freeman C, de Waal FBM (2006) Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 68:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp
Brosnan SF, Hopper LM, Richey S, Freeman HD, Talbot CF, Gosling SD et al (2015) Personality influences responses to inequity and contrast in chimpanzees. Anim Behav 101:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.019
Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272(1560):253–258. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2947
Brosnan SF, Talbot CF, Ahlgren M, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ (2010) Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 79(6):1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019
Byrne G, Abbott KM, Suomi SJ (1996) Reorganization of dominance rank among adult males in a captive group of tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Lab Primate Newsl 35(1):1–4
Colquhoun D (2014) An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. R Soc Open Sci 1:140216. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140216
Cowell JM, Sommerville JA, Decety J (2019) That’s not fair: children’s neural computations of fairness and their impact on resource allocation behaviors and judgments. Dev Psychol 55(11):2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000813
de Waal FBM, Leimgruber KL, Greenberg AR (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(36):13685–13689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807060105
Debove S, Baumard N, André JB (2017) On the evolutionary origins of equity. PLoS One 12(3):e0173636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173636
Dindo M, de Waal FBM (2007) Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 69:448–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp
Dubreuil D, Gentile MS, Visalberghi E (2006) Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273(1591):1223–1228. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3433
Farrar BG, Ostojić L (2019) The illusion of science in comparative cognition. Psyarxiv
Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454(7208):1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868
Fisher JO, Birch LL (1999) Restricting access to palatable foods affects children’s behavioral response, food selection, and intake. Am J Clin Nutr 69(6):1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1264
Fletcher GE (2008) Attending to the outcome of others: disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am J Primatol 70(8):901–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20576
Fontenot MB, Watson SL, Roberts KA, Miller RW (2007) Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 74(3):487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.015
Henrich J (2004) Inequity aversion in capuchins? Nature 428(6979):139–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/428139a
Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H et al (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behav Brain Sci 28(6):795–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000142
Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A et al (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333
Huppert E, Shaw A, Decety J (2020) The effect of hunger on children’s sharing behavior and fairness preferences. J Exp Child Psychol 192:104786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104786
Inglis IR, Forkman B, Lazarus J (1997) Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Anim Behav 53(6):1171–1191. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0320
Ioannidis JPA, Munafò MR, Fusar-Poli P, Nosek BA, David SP (2014) Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence and prevention. Trends Cogn Sci 18(5):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.371
Janson CH (1985) Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18(2):125–138
Laude JR, Pattison KF, Zentall TR (2012) Hungry pigeons make suboptimal choices, less hungry pigeons do not. Psychon Bull Rev 19(5):884–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0282-2
Marshall-Pescini S, Dale R, Quervel-Chaumette M, Range F (2016) Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species. Anim Cogn 19(4):679–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0973-6
Massen JJM, van den Berg LM, Spruijt BM, Sterck EHM (2012) Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Am J Primatol 74(2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.21014
Mayack C, Naug D (2015) Starving honeybees lose self-control. Biol Lett 11:20140820. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0820
McAuliffe K, Chang LW, Leimgruber KL, Spaulding R, Blake PR, Santos LR (2015) Capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella, show no evidence for inequity aversion in a costly choice task. Anim Behav 103:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.014
McGetrick J, Range F (2018) Inequity aversion in dogs: a review. Learn Behav 46:479–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-018-0338-x
Melis AP, Semmann D (2010) How is human cooperation different? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1553):2663–2274. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0157
Noë R, Hammerstein P (1995) Biological markets. Trends Ecol Evol 10(8):336–339
Nosek BA, Errington TM (2020) What is replication? PLoS Biol 18(3):e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
Oberliessen L, Hernandez-Lallement J, Schäble S, van Wingerden M, Seinstra M, Kalenscher T (2016) Inequity aversion in rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim Behav 115:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.007
Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, van de Kuilen G (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Exp Econ 7:171–188
Penke L, Denissen JJA, Miller GF (2007) The evolutionary genetics of personality. Eur J Pers 21:549–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/per
Price SA, Brosnan SF (2012) To each according to his need? variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Soc Justice Res 25(2):140–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0153-z
Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.67
Schmidt MFH, Svetlova M, Johe J, Tomasello M (2016) Children’s developing understanding of legitimate reasons for allocating resources unequally. Cogn Dev 37:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.11.001
Sheskin M, Ashayeri K, Skerry A, Santos LR (2014) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) fail to show inequality aversion in a no-cost situation. Evol Hum Behav 35(2):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.004
Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson JR, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12(3):505–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0211-6
Stevens JR (2017) Replicability and reproducibility in comparative psychology. Front Psychol 8:862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00862
Takimoto A, Fujita K (2011) I acknowledge your help: capuchin monkeys’ sensitivity to others’ labor. Anim Cogn 14(5):715–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0406-5
Takimoto A, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2010) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Anim Cogn 13(2):249–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0262-8
Talbot CF, Parrish AE, Watzek J, Essler JL, Leverett KL, Paukner A, Brosnan SF (2018) The influence of reward quality and quantity and spatial proximity on the responses to inequity and contrast in capuchin monkeys (Cebus [Sapajus] apella). J Comp Psychol 132(1):75–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000088
van Wolkenten M, Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2007) Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(47):18854–18859. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707182104
Watson KK, Platt ML (2008) Neuroethology of reward and decision making. Phil Trans R Soc B 363(1511):3825–3835. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0159
Wesnes KA, Pincock C, Richardson D, Helm G, Hails S (2003) Breakfast reduces declines in attention and memory over the morning in schoolchildren. Appetite 41(3):329–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.08.009
Wynne CDL (2004) Fair refusal by capuchin. Nature 428(2002):447–448
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank James Anderson and Hika Kuroshima for their kind invitation to contribute to this book and the anonymous reviewer for the valuable feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. Further, we are very grateful to all the researchers who discussed their study protocol with us in great detail and provided us with additional highly valuable comments and suggestions. In addition, we wish to thank Kate Grounds for providing us with the picture. We would also like to acknowledge the financial support we received from the European Research Council (Synergy grant 609819 SOMICS provided to Josep Call) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (P2BEP3 175269 provided to Manon K. Schweinfurth).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schweinfurth, M.K., Call, J. (2021). Capuchins (Sapajus apella) and their Aversion to Inequity. In: Anderson, J.R., Kuroshima, H. (eds) Comparative Cognition. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2028-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2028-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2027-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2028-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)