Skip to main content

Simulation and Gaming as Instrument for Social Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simulation and Gaming for Social Design

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 25))

Abstract

In gaming, games can be treated as instruments implicitly. However, due to the ambiguous nature of the notions of “game” and “gaming,” the academic current of simulation and gaming studies, which has come out within the last 50 years, displays truly extensive and ambiguous polymorphism.

In this chapter, titled “Simulation and Gaming as Tools for Social Design,” the author describes the characteristics of problem-solving oriented simulation and gaming, mainly with our social design in the twenty-first century in mind, going back to Richard Duke’s arguments of the Gestalt communication. The author also explains the common process structure of gaming techniques. Moreover, also describes gaming as a scientific method, and looks at gaming simulation for social design through comparison with game theory, conflict analysis, and agent-based social simulation, which are operational models of multi-agent systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff R (1962) Scientific method. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai K (1988) What is gaming-simulation? In: Arai K et al (eds) Gaming simulation. Nkkagiren Publisher (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P (1980) Hypergames: developing a model of conflict. Futures Dec 1980:489–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1996) Would-be worlds: how simulation is changing the frontiers of science. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke R (1974) Gaming: the future’s language. Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott MLP (1999) The role of facilitators, mediators, and other consensus building practitioners. In: Susskind et al (eds) The consensus building handbook. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Ury WL, Patton B (2011) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1970) Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T (1999) Mathematical models of learning and decision-making agent with internal model and poly-agent system. Theory Methodol 14(2):53–71 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T (2005) Simulation and gaming for societal system design. Kyoritsu Publisher (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T (2007) System theory of multi agent system - as a basis for problem-solving methodology. J Measur Control 46(4):312–318 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T (2012) On a formalization of agent-based social systems: as a common basis for modeling gaming simulation and agent based social simulation. Stud Simul Gaming 22(Special Issue):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T (2019) Action research and gaming exercise for social design. Stud Simul Gaming 29(1):2–9 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Kitani S (1994) A theoretical consideration of a simulation model for decision support: a systematic analysis of learning in model-referenced decision making. J Stud Simul Gaming 4(1):7–17 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Kitani S (1995) A theoretical consideration of model-referenced decision behavior in model learning process. Stud Simul Gaming 5(1):78–86 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Kitani S (1996) Mathematical formalization of participatory modeling techniques. Stud Simul Gaming 6(1):25–34 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Kitani S (1997) A mathematical model of hierarchical planning organization of learning agents. Stud Simul Gaming 7(1):58–67 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Kitani S (1998) A model for mutual learning process on first-level Hypergame: a mathematical approach for consensus building process management. Stud Simul Gaming 8(1):32–41 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda T, Cui M, Sahab S, Sadiq AR (2020) Gaming exercise for rights-conversion-type urban redevelopment project in international cooperation context. Simul Gaming 51(2):212–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obata N (1992) Environmental conflict experimental game. Gihodo Publisher (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne R (1972) Communicating holistic insights. Fields within fields … within fields. 5(1). World Institute Council (Also in: Greenblat C, Duke R (1975) Gaming-simulation: rationale, design, and applications: a text with parallel readings for social scientists, educators, and community workers. Sage)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik M (1975) The uses and methods of gaming. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind L et al (1999a) Using assisted negotiation to settle land use disputes. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind L et al (1999b) A short guide to consensus building. In: Susskind et al (eds) The consensus building handbook. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan S, Thiagarajan R (2011) Barnga: a simulation game on cultural clashes. Nicholas Brealey

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth F (1988) Policy exercises—objectives and design elements & procedures for and implementation. Simul Gaming 19(3):235–276

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Kaneda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaneda, T. (2021). Simulation and Gaming as Instrument for Social Design. In: Kaneda, T., Hamada, R., Kumazawa, T. (eds) Simulation and Gaming for Social Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2011-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics