Skip to main content

Maclaurin Symmetric Mean-Based Archimedean Aggregation Operators for Aggregating Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Elements and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

Abstract

Due to larger capacity to deal ambiguous, imprecise, and vague information, hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets are now being extensively used in multicriteria decision making contexts. The main objective of this chapter is to combine Maclaurin symmetric mean with Archimedean \(t\)-conorms and \(t\)-norms to aggregate hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy elements. In multicriteria decision making, it is frequently required to consider heterogeneous interrelationships among the decision values provided by the decision makers. To handle those types of heterogeneous characteristics, Maclaurin symmetric mean operator is used for aggregating multi-input hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy arguments. At the same time, Archimedean \(t\)-conorms and \(t\)-norms are used to produce adaptable and flexible operational rules for fuzzy numbers. Thus, the proposed aggregation operators not only capture interrelationships between the input arguments but also efficient to construct several forms of aggregation operators by resolving hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy uncertainties. In the proposed method, at first, some operational rules of hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy elements are defined based on Archimedean \(t\)-conorms and \(t\)-norms. Then using those rules, Archimedean hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators and their weighted forms are developed. Some classifications and properties related to the proposed operators are discussed. By employing those operators, an approach for solving multicriteria decision making problems is developed. Finally, a numerical example is provided to verify the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–356

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas A, Modak N (2013) A fuzzy goal programming technique for multiobjective chance constrained programming with normally distributed fuzzy random variables and fuzzy numbers. Int J Mathem Oper Res 5:551–570

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas A, Majumder D (2014) Genetic algorithm based hybrid fuzzy system for assessing morningness. Adv Fuzzy Syst 2014:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas A, Adan A, Halder P, Majumdar D, Natale V, Randler C, Tonetti L, Sahu S (2014) Exploration of transcultural properties of the reduced version of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ) using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Biological Rhythm Res 45(6):955–968

    Google Scholar 

  5. Debnath J, Majumder D, Biswas A (2018) Air quality assessment using interval type-2 weighted fuzzy inference system. Ecological Inform 46:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biswas A, Kumar S (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy possibility degree measure for ordering of IVIFNs with its application to MCDM. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 8(4):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas A, Kumar S (2019) Generalization of extent analysis method for solving multicriteria decision making problems involving intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. OPSEARCH 56:1142–1166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Biswas A (2019) A unified TOPSIS approach to MADM problems in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Adv Intelli Syst Comput 799:435–447

    Google Scholar 

  10. Debnath J, Biswas A (2018) Analytic hierarchy process based on interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their application to multicriteria decision making. Intelli Decision Technol 12(3):359–370

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakiboglu G, Bulgurcu B (2020) Supplier selection in a Turkish textile company by using intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making. J Textile Inst, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao Y, Li D, Zhong H (2020) A novel target threat assessment method based on three-way decisions under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making environment. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103276

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceedings Joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting, Edmonton, Canada, pp 57–61

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peng X, Yuan H (2016) Fundamental properties of pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Fundamenta Informaticae 147(4):415–446

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dyckhoff H, Pedrycz W (1984) Generalized means as model of compensative connectives. Fuzzy Sets Syst 14:143–154

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg H (2016) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision making process. Int J Intell Syst 32(6):597–630

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wei G, Lu M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(1):169–186

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ren PJ, Xu ZS, Gou XJ (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259

    Google Scholar 

  21. Biswas A, Sarkar B (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria group decision making through similarity measure based on point operators. Int J Intell Syst 33(8):1731–1744

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen TY (2010) New Chebyshev distance measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to multiple criteria decision analysis using an extended ELECTRE approach. Expert Syst Appl 147:113164

    Google Scholar 

  23. Biswas A, Sarkar B (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision-making with unknown weight information through entropy measure. Int J Intell Syst 34(6):1108–1128

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Mojtahedi M, Newton S (2020) Introducing a multi-criteria evaluation method using Pythagorean fuzzy sets: A case study focusing on resilient construction project selection, Kybernetes, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2019-0225

  25. Zhang Q, Hu J, Feng J, Liu A (2020) Multiple criteria decision making method based on the new similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy set. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39(1):809–820

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liang D, Darko AP, Zeng J (2020) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy power average-based MULTIMOORA method for multi-criteria decision-making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 32(5):845–874

    Google Scholar 

  27. Biswas A, Sarkar B (2019) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach through point operator based similarity measures for multicriteria group decision making. Kybernetes 48(3):496–519

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sarkar B, Biswas A (2019) A unified method for Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making using entropy measure, linear programming and extended technique for ordering preference by similarity to ideal solution. Soft Comput 24:5333–5344

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Ahmed R, Ullah M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(1):635–647

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Garg H (2018) Generalised Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations and their application to decision making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30(6):763–794

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng S, Chen J, Li X (2016) A Hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Int J Inform Technol Decision Making 15(2):403–422

    Google Scholar 

  32. Garg H (2017) Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process. Comput Mathem Organ Theory 23(4):546–571

    Google Scholar 

  33. Garg H (2019) Novel neutrality operation-based Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision analysis. Int J Intell Syst 34(10):2459–2489

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garg H (2020) Neutrality operations-based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its applications to multiple attribute group decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 11:3021–3041

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garg H (2019) New logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 34(1):82–106

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L, Garg H, Li N (2020) Pythagorean fuzzy interactive Hamacher power aggregation operators for assessment of express service quality with entropy weight. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05193-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: The 18th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Jeju Island, Korea, pp 1378–1382

    Google Scholar 

  38. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Liang D, Xu Z (2017) The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 60:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lu M, Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2017) Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(2):1105–1117

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Garg H (2018) Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision-making. International Int J Uncert Quant 8(3):267–289

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Oztaysi B, Cevik OS, Seker S, Kahraman C (2019) Water treatment technology selection using hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy hierarchical decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(1):867–884

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maclaurin C (1729) A second letter from Mr. Colin Mc Laurin, Professor of Mathematics in the University of Edinburgh and F. R. S. to Martin Folkes, Esq; Concerning the roots of equations, with the demonstration of other rules in algebra, Philosophical Transactions 36:59–96

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wei G, Lu M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(5):1043–1070

    Google Scholar 

  45. Garg H (2019) Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and its applications to multiattribute decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 34(4):601–626

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wei G, Garg H, Gao H, Wei C (2018) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:67866–67884

    Google Scholar 

  47. Klir G, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen HT, Walker EA (1997) A first course in fuzzy logic. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Sarkar A, Biswas A (2019) Multi criteria decision-making using Archimedean aggregation operators in Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment. Int J Intell Syst 34(7):1361–1386

    Google Scholar 

  50. Klement EP, Mesiar R (2005) Logical, algebraic, analytic, and probabilistic aspects of triangular norms. Elsevier, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Liang D, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Darko AP (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operator and its accelerative calculating algorithm with the multithreading. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):615–633

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tang X, Wei G (2019) Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators in multi-attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci 29(2):339–386

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang Z (2020) Maclaurin symmetric means of dual hesitant fuzzy information and their use in multi-criteria decision making. Granular Comput 5(2):251–275

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors remain grateful to the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript. Authors are also thankful to Dr. H. Garg, the editor, for his continuous effort for publication of this book chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Animesh Biswas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sarkar, A., Biswas, A. (2021). Maclaurin Symmetric Mean-Based Archimedean Aggregation Operators for Aggregating Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Elements and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision Making. In: Garg, H. (eds) Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1989-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics