Abstract
Simulation of coal combustion remains challenging due to the many physical processes involved which span a large range of length and time scales. Although detailed models exist for devolatilization, char oxidation and gas-phase kinetics, most simulation efforts simplify these models considerably to reduce the high cost of simulation. Three mixture fraction-based chemistry models are evaluated, namely, the steady laminar flamelet, equilibrium, and Burke-Schumann models in the scope of coal volatiles combustion. Coal volatiles are assumed to be composed of “light gasses” (CH\(_4\), CO, etc.) as well as tar, which refers to the various large aromatic compounds released during the devolatilization process. Here, tar is treated as a single empirical species. Each mixture fraction-based model is evaluated by comparing predicted gas phase properties to computations using finite-rate chemistry with a detailed reaction model. The results indicate that the reconstructions for gas phase temperature and composition from steady flamelet model is the most accurate. The Burke-Schumann chemistry model performed very poorly for predicting the gas phase temperature and composition under stoichiometric conditions. We apply the steady laminar flamelet model to Moderate or Intense Low Oxygen Dilution (MILD) combustion. A key requirement for MILD combustion is that mixing rates are sufficiently fast that gas-phase chemistry occurs nearly volumetrically, eliminating visible flame structures. A Well-stirred reactor assumption is applied to MILD combustion due to its characteristic of volumetric reactions. The necessary conditions to achieve MILD combustion, including recirculation rate of flue gas and heat loss, are determined under various mixture fractions and mass fractions of light gas in the fuel stream. We conclude that the increasing the recirculation rate and heat loss are helpful for achieving MILD regime. Additionally, we observe that the recirculation rate and heat loss values required to achieve MILD combustion increase as the fuel stream is enriched in light gases. Steady flamelet computations reveal that MILD combustion can be achieved when reactants are not well-mixed as long as the scalar dissipation rate is sufficiently large. Our considerations indicate that the steady laminar flamelet model provides a reliable method to model MILD combustion in the absence of well-mixed reactants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bai Y, Luo K, Qiu K, Fan J (2016) Numerical investigation of two-phase flame structures in a simplified coal jet flame. Fuel 182:944–957. ISSN: 0016-2361
Brown AL, Fletcher TH (1997) Modeling soot derived from pulverized coal. Energy Fuels 4:745–757
Burke SP, Schumann TEW (1928) Diffusion flames. Ind Eng Chem 20:998–1004
Cavaliere A, De Joannon M (2004) Mild combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30:329–366
Goodwin DG, Moffat HK, Speth RL (2017) Cantera: an object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes version 2.3.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.170284. http://www.cantera.org
Goshayeshi B, Sutherland JC (2015a) Prediction of oxy-coal flame stand-off using high-fidelity thermochemical models and the one-dimensional turbulence model. Proc Combust Inst 35:2829–2837. ISSN: 15407489
Goshayeshi B, Sutherland JC (2015b) A comparative study of thermochemistry models for oxy-coal combustion simulation. Combust Flame 162:4016–4024. ISSN: 0010-2180
Goshayeshi B, Sutherland JC (2019) A comparison of various models in predicting ignition delay in single-particle coal combustion. Combust Flame 161:1900–1910. ISSN: 15562921 (2014). In: 9th International symposium on coal combustion (ISCC-9) Qingdao, China, 21–24 July 2019
Hansen MA, Sutherland JC (2017) Dual timestepping methods for detailed combustion chemistry. Combusti Theory Model Month 21:329–345
Hara T, Muto M, Kitano T, Kurose R, Komori S (2015) Direct numerical simulation of a pulverized coal jet flame employing a global volatile matter reaction scheme based on detailed reaction mechanism. Combust Flame 162:4391–4407. ISSN: 0010-2180
Jupudi R, Zamansky V, Fletcher T (2009) Prediction of light gas composition in coal devolatilization. Energy Fuels 23:3063–3067
Kerstein AR (1999) One-dimensional turbulence: model formulation and application to homogeneous turbulence, shear flows, and buoyant stratified flows. J Fluid Mech 392:277–334
Li P et al (2014) Moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution oxy-combustion characteristics of light oil and pulverized coal in a pilot-scale furnace. Energy Fuels 28:1524–1535. ISSN: 08870624
Lu T, Law CK (2008) A criterion based on computational singular perturbation for the identification of quasi steady state species: a reduced mechanism for methane oxidation with NO chemistry. Combust Flame 154:761–774. ISSN: 00102180
Luo K, Wang H, Fan J, Yi F (2012) Direct numerical simulation of pulverized coal combustion in a hot vitiated co-flow. Energy Fuels 26:6128–6136
McConnell J, Sutherland JC (2020) Assessment of various tar and soot treatment methods and a priori analysis of the steady laminar flamelet model for use in coal combustion simulation. Fuel 265:116775. ISSN: 00162361
McConnell J, Goshayeshi B, Sutherland JC (2016) The effect of model fidelity on prediction of char burnout for single-particle coal combustion. Proc Combust Inst
McConnell J, Goshayeshi B, Sutherland JC (2017) An evaluation of the efficacy of various coal combustion models for predicting char burnout. Fuel 201:53–64
Olenik G, Stein O, Kronenburg A (2015) LES of swirl-stabilised pulverised coal combustion in IFRF furnace No. 1. Proc Combust Inst 35:2819–2828. ISSN: 1540-7489
Özdemir IB, Peters N (2001) Characteristics of the reaction zone in a combustor operating at mild combustion. Exp Fluids 30:683–695. ISSN: 07234864
Pedel J, Thornock JN, Smith PJ (2013) Ignition of co-axial turbulent diffusion oxy-coal jet flames: experiments and simulations collaboration. Combust Flame 160:1112–1128. ISSN: 0010-2180
Peters N (1984) Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 10:319–339. ISSN: 0360-1285
Plessing T, Peters N, Wünning JG (1998) Laseroptical investigation of highly preheated combustion with strong exhaust gas recirculation. Symp (Int) Combust 27:3197–3204. ISSN: 00820784
Rieth M et al (2016) Flamelet LES of a semi-industrial pulverized coal furnace. Combust Flame 173:39–56. ISSN: 0010-2180
Rieth M, Kempf A, Kronenburg A, Stein O (2018) Carrier-phase DNS of pulverized coal particle ignition and volatile burning in a turbulent mixing layer. Fuel 212:364–374. ISSN: 0016-2361
Saha M, Dally BB, Medwell PR, Cleary E (2013) An experimental study of MILD combustion of pulverized coal in a recuperative furnace 2 experimental setup. In: 9th Asia-Pacific conference on combustion, Gyeongju Hilton, Gyeongju, Korea, 19–22 May 2013, pp 3–6
Saha M, Dally BB, Medwell PR, Cleary EM (2014) Moderate or intense low oxygen dilution (MILD) combustion characteristics of pulverized coal in a self-recuperative furnace. Energy Fuels 28:6046–6057. ISSN: 15205029
Saha M, Chinnici A, Dally BB, Medwell PR (2015) Numerical study of pulverized coal MILD combustion in a self-recuperative furnace. Energy Fuels 29:7650–7669. ISSN: 15205029
Saha M, Dally BB, Medwell PR, Chinnici A (2016) Burning characteristics of Victorian brown coal under MILD combustion conditions. Combust Flame 172:252–270. ISSN: 15562921
Saha M, Dally BB, Medwell PR, Chinnici A (2017) Effect of particle size on the MILD combustion characteristics of pulverised brown coal. Fuel Process Technol 155:74–87. ISSN: 03783820
Smart JP, Riley GS (2012) Combustion of coal in a flameless oxidation environment under oxyfuel firing conditions: the reality. J Energy Inst 85:131–134
Suda T, Takafuji M, Hirata T, Yoshino M, Sato J (2002) A study of combustion behavior of pulverized coal in high-temperature air. Proc Combust Inst 29:503–509. ISSN: 1540–7489
Sutherland JC, Kennedy CA (2003) Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows. J Comput Phys 191:502–524. ISSN: 00219991
Sutherland J, Punati N, Kerstein A (2019) A unified approach to the various formulations of the one-dimensional-turbulence model tech. rep. (Inst. Clean Secure Energy, 2010). In: 9th International symposium on coal combustion (ISCC-9), Qingdao, China, 21–24 July 2019
Tamura M, Watanabe S, Komaba K, Okazaki K (2015) Combustion behaviour of pulverised coal in high temperature air condition for utility boilers. Appl Thermal Eng 75:445–450
Watanabe J, Yamamoto K (2015) Flamelet model for pulverized coal combustion. Proc Combust Inst 35:2315–2322. ISSN: 1540-7489
Watanabe J, Okazaki T, Yamamoto K, Kuramashi K, Baba A (2017) Large-eddy simulation of pulverized coal combustion using flamelet model. Proc Combust Inst 36:2155–2163. ISSN: 1540-7489
Weber R, Smart JP, Kamp WV (2005) On the (MILD) combustion of gaseous, liquid, and solid fuels in high temperature preheated air. Proc Combust Inst 30(II):2623–2629. ISSN: 15407489
Wen X, Wang H, Luo K, Fan J (2019) Analysis and flamelet modelling for laminar pulverised coal combustion considering the wall effect. Combust Theory Model 23:353–375
Wunning JA, Wunning JG (1997) Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal NO-formation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 23(23):81–94
Zhao Y, Serio MA, Bassilakis R, Solomon PR (1994) A method of predicting coal devolatilization behavior based on the elemental composition. Symp (Int) Combust 25:553–560. ISSN: 0082-0784
Zhou MM et al (2019) Large-eddy simulation of ash deposition in a large-scale laboratory furnace. Proc Combust Inst 37:4409–4418. ISSN: 15407489
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation under grant NSF1704141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Tsinghua University Press.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhou, H., McConnell, J., Ring, T.A., Sutherland, J.C. (2022). Insights of MILD Combustion from High-Fidelity Simulations. In: Lyu, J., Li, S. (eds) Clean Coal and Sustainable Energy. ISCC 2019. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1656-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1657-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)