Abstract
Epidemiological data on birth defects is usually derived from surveillance systems. Systematic surveillance for birth defects is yet to be established in India. Data on the magnitude and trends of birth defects have to be derived from other sources, primarily research studies. This review provides an overview of sources of data on congenital anomalies in India, and the magnitude, mortality and disability associated with these conditions in the country. Available data indicate a birth prevalence of 18.44–23.05 per 1000 births, which translates into 472,177 and 581,899 affected births occurring annually in the country. Estimates of congenital anomaly neonatal mortality range from 54,000 to 99,000. Epidemiological data identify that as congenital anomaly mortality is averted, the numbers of disability survivors increase. Data from limited studies suggest that 70% of birth defects are non-fatal. The Modell Global Database of Congenital Disorders estimates that there would be over 150,000 survivors with congenital disability at five years of age per birth cohort. The review identifies the need for a nation-wide birth defects surveillance system for monitoring these large numbers in India. The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram, a community-based screening and early identification programme for common childhood diseases, nutritional deficiencies, birth defects and developmental delays and disabilities, is a potential opportunity for collecting nation-wide data on birth defects. Till surveillance is established, robust primary studies are needed, that can inform the true prevalence of congenital anomaly affected births, mortality and survivors with disability. Strategically established population-based surveillance can be utilized to monitor the types and prevalence of congenital anomalies in India.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA et al (2019) National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. Birth Defects Res 111(18):1420–1435
Lanzoni M, Morris J, Garne E et al (2017) European monitoring of congenital anomalies. JRC-EUROCAT report on statistical monitoring of congenital anomalies (2006–2015). EUR 29010 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-77305-1. https://doi.org/10.2760/157556, PUBSY No. JRC109868. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC109868/kjna29010enn.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018
Gibson CS, Scott H, Rice R, Scheil W (2017) Birth defects in South Australia 2013. SA Birth Defects Register, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide. Available at https://www.wch.sa.gov.au/services/az/other/phru/documents/2013_sabdr_annual_report.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018
Correa‐Villaseñor A, Cragan J, Kucik J, O’Leary L, Siffel C, Williams L (2003) The metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the centers for disease control and prevention. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 67(9):617–624
Mai CT, Kirby RS, Correa A, Rosenberg D, Petros M, Fagen MC (2016) Public health practice of population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 22(3):E1–E8
Botto LD, Robert-Gnansia E, Siffel C, Harris J, Borman B, Mastroiacovo P (2006) Fostering international collaboration in birth defects research and prevention: a perspective from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Public Health 96(5):774–780
Irgens LM (2000) The medical birth registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Spec Issue Rev 79(6):435–439
Groisman B, Bidondo MP, Gili JA, Barbero P, Liascovich R (2013) Strategies to achieve sustainability and quality in birth defects registries: the experience of the National Registry of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina. J Registry Manag 40(1):29–31
Birth defects surveillance: a manual for programme managers, second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. SRS statistical report 2017. In: Estimates of mortality indicators, Chap 4. Available at https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Report_2017/11.%20Chap%204-Estimates%20of%20Mortality%20Indicators-2017.pdf. Accessed April 2021
UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN-DESA Population Division. Levels and trends in child mortality report 2019. Estimates developed by the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2019.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018
Hug L, Alexander M, You D, UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (2019) National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 7(6):e710–e720
Bhide P, Kar A (2018) A national estimate of the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in India: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 18(1):175
Bhide P, Gund P, Kar A (2016) Prevalence of congenital anomalies in an Indian maternal cohort: healthcare, prevention, and surveillance implications. PLoS ONE 11(11):e0166408
Modell B, Darlison MW, Moorthie S, Blencowe H, Petrou M, Lawn J (2016) Epidemiological methods in community genetics and the Modell Global Database of Congenital Disorders (MGDb). Available at https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1532179/17/Epidemiological%20Methods%20in%20Community%20Genetics%20and%20the%20Modell%20Global%20Database%202017-04.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2018
Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B (2006) March of Dimes global report on birth defects: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, White Plains
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, National Health Mission (2013) Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram. A child health screening and early intervention services under NRHM. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available at https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/RBSK/Operational_Guidelines/Operational%20Guidelines_RBSK.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2019
Singh AK, Kumar R, Mishra CK, Khera A, Srivastava A (2015) Moving from survival to healthy survival through child health screening and early intervention services under Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK). Indian J Pediatr 82(11):1012–1018
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2019) Answers data of Rajya Sabha questions for session 240/year wise physical status Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) during 2014–15 and 2015–16. Available at https://data.gov.in/node/3978901/download. Accessed 18 Nov 2019
Birth Defects Registry of India. Available at https://fcrf.org.in/bdri_abus.asp. Accessed 11 Oct 2017
SEAR NBBD newborn and birth defects surveillance initiative. https://origin.searo.who.int/entity/child_adolescent/nbbd/web/en/#:~:text=In%202014%2C%20WHO%2DSEARO%20created,for%20submission%20to%20the%20system. Accessed 6 Aug 2019
Office of the Registrar General India. Report on medical certification of cause of death 2017 Available at https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/mccd_Report1/MCCD_Report-2017.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018
Fadel SA, Rasaily R, Awasthi S, Begum R, Black RE, Gelband H et al (2017) Changes in cause-specific neonatal and 1–59-month child mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 390(10106):1972–1980
Liu L, Chu Y, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Bassani DG et al (2019) National, regional, and state-level all-cause and cause-specific under-5 mortality in India in 2000–15: a systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Glob Health 7(6):e721–e734
Dandona R, Kumar GA, Henry NJ et al (2020) Subnational mapping of under-5 and neonatal mortality trends in India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–17. Lancet 395(10237):1640–1658
Ujagare D, Kar A (2021) Birth defect mortality in India 1990–2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease data. J Community Genet 12(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-020-00487-z. Epub 2020 Oct 15. PMID: 33063164; PMCID: PMC7846616
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Persons with disabilities in India. NSS report no. 583 (76/26/1), July–Dec 2018. Available at https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Report_583_Final_0.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2018
Fall CHD (2018) Nutrition in fetal life and childhood and its linkage with adult non-communicable disease: lessons from birth cohort studies in India. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 84(4):881–889
Botto LD, Mastroiacovo P (2018) Triple surveillance: a proposal for an integrated strategy to support and accelerate birth defect prevention. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1414(1):126–136
Nagarajan TJP, Goel S (2016) Is mother and child tracking system (MCTS) on the right track? An experience from a northern state of India. Indian J Public Health 60(1):34–39
Gera R, Muthusamy N, Bahulekar A, Sharma A, Singh P, Sekhar A, Singh V (2015) An in-depth assessment of India’s mother and child tracking system (MCTS) in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kar, A., Ujagare, D. (2021). Magnitude of Congenital Anomalies in India. In: Kar, A. (eds) Birth Defects in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1553-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1554-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)