Skip to main content

Thalidomide: Understanding the Responsibilities of a Birth Defects Service

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Birth Defects in India

Abstract

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the teratogenic drug thalidomide caused an epidemicĀ of serious birth defects. Thalidomide embryopathy in its severest form produced limb reduction defects and other malformations, causing severe disability in survivors. This article uses the thalidomide incident as a case study to illustrate the health and social welfare responses that were put into place to address the needs of children born with disabilities and their families. These health and social service activities represent the core functions of a birth defects service. While thalidomide left its impact on industrialized countries, fifty years later, another teratogen, the Zika virus, threatened low- and middle-income countries. Congenital Zika virus syndrome, another disabling birth defect, is marked by severe microcephaly and intellectual disability in survivors. The article briefly compares the global health response to this teratogen five decades after the thalidomide episode, identifying that health systems of low- and middle-income countries still lack the preparedness to address severe birth defects caused by an unexpected teratogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stevenson RE, Hall JG (2015) Introduction. In: Stevenson RE, Hall JG, Everman DB, Solomon BD (eds) Human anomalies and related anomalies, No. 66. Oxford University Press

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Were WM, Daelmans B, Bhutta Z, Duke T, Bahl R, Boschi-Pinto C, Bhan MK (2015) Childrenā€™s health priorities and interventions. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 351:h4300

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Vargesson N (2013) Thalidomide embryopathy: an enigmatic challenge. ISRN Dev Biol 241016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/24101

  4. Vargesson N (2015) Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 105(2):140ā€“156

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Taussig HB (1962) A study of the German outbreak of phocomelia. The thalidomide syndrome. JAMA 180:1106ā€“1114

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Kim JH, Scialli AR (2011) Thalidomide: the tragedy of birth defects and the effective treatment of disease. Toxicol Sci 122(1):1ā€“6

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Ito T, Ando H, Handa H (2011) Teratogenic effects of thalidomide: molecular mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(9):1569ā€“1579

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Emanuel M, Rawlins M, Duff G, Breckenridge A (2012) Thalidomide and its sequelae. Lancet 380(9844):781ā€“783

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Rajkumar SV (2004) Thalidomide: tragic past and promising future. Mayo Clin Proc 79(7):899ā€“903

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Clow B (2008) Defining disability, limiting liability: the care for thalidomide victims in Canada. In: Heaman EA, Li A, McKellar S (eds) Essays in honor of Michael Bliss: figuring the social. University of Toronto Press

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Newbronner E, Atkin K (2018) The changing health of thalidomide survivors as they age: a scoping review. Disabil Health J 11(2):184ā€“191

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Fetal thalidomide syndrome. Genetic and Rare Disease Information Centre, National Centre for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute of Health. Available at https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/2313/fetal-thalidomide-syndrome. Accessed 8 Nov 18

  13. Smithells RW, Newman CGH (1992) Recognition of thalidomide defects. J Med Genet 29:716ā€“723

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Lenz W (1988) A short history of thalidomide embryopathy. Teratology 38(3):203ā€“215

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. McBride W (1961) Thalidomide and congenital malformations. Lancet 1:358

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Smithells RW (1973) Defects and disabilities of thalidomide children. Br Med J 1(5848):269ā€“272

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Ingalls TH, Klingberg M (1965) Implications of epidemic embryopathy for public health. Am J Public Health Nations Health 55(2):200ā€“208

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Mongeau M, Gingras G, Sherman ED, Hebert B, Hutchison J, Corriveau C (1966) Medical and psychosocial aspects of the habilitation of thalidomide children. Can Med Assoc J 95(9):390ā€“395

    CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Martin JK, Rathbun JC (1963) Habilitation of patients with congenital malformations associated with thalidomide: pediatric aspects. Can Med Assoc J 88(19):959ā€“962

    CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Bent N, Tennant A, Neumann V, Chamberlain MA (2007) Living with thalidomide: health status and quality of life at 40 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 31(2):147ā€“156

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Gingras G, Mongeau M, Moreasult P, Dupuis M, Herbert B, Corriveau C (1964) Congenital anomalies of the limbs II. Psychological and educational aspects. Can Med Assoc J 91:115ā€“119

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Dā€™Avignon M, Hellgren K, Juhlin I, AtterbƤck B (1967) Diagnostic and habilitation problems of thalidomide-traumatized children with multiple handicaps. Dev Med Child Neurol 9:707ā€“712

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Support for Australiaā€™s thalidomide survivors. Submission 4. The experience of UK-thalidomide damaged people (thalidomiders) and the British governmentā€™s financial support. Available at file:///C:/Users/jayanta%20Pal/Downloads/sub04_UKTCT.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2018

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Klausen SM, Parle J (2015) ā€˜Are we going to stand by and let these children come into the world?ā€™: the impact of the ā€˜thalidomide disasterā€™ in South Africa, 1960ā€“1977. J South Afr Stud 41(4):735ā€“752

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Peters KM, Albus C, LĆ¼ngen M, Niecke A, Pfaff H, Samel C (2015) Damage to health, psychosocial disorders and care requirements of thalidomide survivors in North Rhine Westphalia from a long-term perspective. Expert Opinion Commissioned by LZG.NRW Federal Health Centre North Rhine Westphalia (LZG.NRW), WesterfeldstraƟe. Available at https://www.thalidomidetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Cologne-Report.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  26. Editorial (1963) Rehabilitation of thalidomide-deformed children. Can Med Assoc J 83:488ā€“489

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Correa-VillaseƱor A, Cragan J, Kucik J, Oā€™Leary L, Siffel C, Williams L (2003) The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 67(9):617ā€“624

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Botto LD, Robert-Gnansia E, Siffel C, Harris J, Borman B, Mastroiacovo P (2006) Fostering international collaboration in birth defects research and prevention: a perspective from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Public Health 96(5):774ā€“780

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Junod SW. FDA and clinical drug trials: a short history. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/History/ProductRegulation/UCM593494.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  30. Tantibanchachai C (2014) US regulatory response to thalidomide (1950ā€“2000). Embryo Project Encyclopedia. ISSN: 1940-5030 https://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/7733

  31. Fornasier G, Francescon S, Leone R, Baldo P (2018) An historical overview of pharmacovigilance. Int J Clin Pharm 40:744

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Mosley JF 2nd, Smith LL, Dezan MD (2015) An overview of upcoming changes in pregnancy and lactation labeling information. Pharm Pract (Granada) 13(2):605

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Parker C (2012) From immorality to public health: thalidomide and the debate for legal abortion. Aust Soc Hist Med 25(4):863ā€“880

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Lachmann PJ (2012) The penumbra of thalidomide, the litigation culture and the licensing of pharmaceuticals. QJM 105(12):1179ā€“1189

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Sales Luiz Vianna F, Kowalski TW, Fraga LR, Sanseverino MT, Schuler-Faccini L (2017) The impact of thalidomide use in birth defects in Brazil. Eur J Med Genet 60(1):12ā€“15

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Moro A, Invernizzi N (2017) The thalidomide tragedy: the struggle for victimsā€™ rights and improved pharmaceutical regulation. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 24(3):603ā€“622

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR (2016) Zika virus and birth defectsā€”reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med 374(20):1981ā€“1987

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  38. Baud D, Gubler DJ, Schaub B, Lanteri MC, Musso D (2017) An update on Zika virus infection. Lancet 390(10107):2099ā€“2109

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  39. Sampathkumar P, Sanchez JL (2016) Zika virus in the Americas: a review for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc 91(4):514ā€“521

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  40. FranƧa GV, Schuler-Faccini L, Oliveira WK, Henriques CM, Carmo EH, Pedi VD et al (2016) Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation. Lancet 388(10047):891ā€“897

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  41. World Health Organization. Zika virus and complications: 2016 public health emergency of international concern. Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus-tmp/en/. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  42. World Health Organization. Zika strategic response plan revised for July 2016-December 2017. World Health Organization. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246091/WHO-Zikavirus-SRF-16.3-eng.pdf;jsessionid=7B8090D79000C866C2A2D8BDD9ACD76F?sequence=1. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  43. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, Fonseca EB et al (2017) Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr 171(3):288ā€“295

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  44. Oussayef NL, Pillai SK, Honein MA et al (2017) Zika virusā€”10 public health achievements in 2016 and future priorities. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65:1482ā€“1488

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  45. Honein MA, Dawson AL, Petersen EE et al (2017) Birth defects among fetuses and infants of US women with evidence of possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy. JAMA 317(1):59ā€“68

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  46. Castro MC (2016) Zika virus and health systems in Brazil: from unknown to a menace. Health Syst Reform 2(2):119ā€“122

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  47. GĆ³mez EJ, Perez FA, Ventura D (2018) What explains the lacklustre response to Zika in Brazil? Exploring institutional, economic and health system context. BMJ Glob Health 3(5):e000862

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  48. SkrƄning S, Lindskog BV (2017) The Zika outbreak in Brazil: an unequal burden. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 137(22). Available at https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2017/11/global-helse/zika-outbreak-brazil-unequal-burden. Accessed Aug 2018

  49. Souza WV, Albuquerque MFPM, Vazquez E, Bezerra LCA, Mendes ADCG, Lyra TM et al (2018) Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil. BMC Public Health 18(1):130

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  50. Bailey DB Jr, Ventura LO (2018) The likely impact of congenital Zika syndrome on families: considerations for family supports and services. Pediatrics 141(Suppl 2):S180ā€“S187

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  51. Dos Santos Oliveira SJG, Dos Reis CL, Cipolotti R, Gurgel RQ, Santos VS, Martins-Filho PRS (2017) Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in mothers of newborns with microcephaly and presumed congenital Zika virus infection: a follow-up study during the first year after birth. Arch Womens Ment Health 20(3):473ā€“475

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  52. Diniz D (2016) Zika virus and women. Cad Saude Publica 32(5):e00046316

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  53. World Health Organization (2016) Psychosocial support for pregnant women and for families with microcephaly and other neurological complications in the context of Zika virus. Interim guidance for health-care providers. WHO/ZIKV/MOC/16.6. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/zika/psychosocial-support/en/. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kar, A. (2021). Thalidomide: Understanding the Responsibilities of a Birth Defects Service. In: Kar, A. (eds) Birth Defects in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1553-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1554-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics