Skip to main content

Pollutant Control by Absorption Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-Pollutant Control for Flue Gases

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC,volume 63))

  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

Gaseous pollutants emitted from human activities, such as the use of fossil fuels, smelting ferrous/nonferrous metals, and producing and using chemicals, pose a severe threat to humans and the environment. Absorption is commonly used to reduce the emission of gaseous pollutants by absorbing harmful components of a gas stream into an absorbent. Despite mature industrial applications, further improvements to absorption technology are required. In this chapter, the principles of pollution control by absorption are introduced in detail. First, the fundamentals and key factors of SO2 absorption are discussed, including process chemistry, mass transfer, and reaction kinetics. Based on the influence of these factors, SO2 absorption enhancement methods, such as pH adjustment, desulfurization additives, and scrubber optimization, are demonstrated in the second section. In light of the urgent need for multi-pollutant control, technologies for simultaneous control of other pollutants, such as NOx and Hg, in the SO2 absorption process are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Toprac A, Rochelle G (1982) Limestone dissolution in stack gas desulfurization. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 1(1):52–58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pan D, Wu H, Yang L (2017) Investigation on the relationship between the fine particle emission and crystallization characteristics of gypsum during wet flue gas desulfurization process. J Environ Sci 55(005):303–310

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rezaei F et al (2015) SOx/NOx removal from flue gas streams by solid adsorbents: a review of current challenges and future directions. Energy Fuels 29(9):5467–5486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J, Wang H (2020) Study on efficient removal of SOx and NOx from marine exhaust gas by wet scrubbing method using urea peroxide solution. Chem Eng J 390:124567

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ding J, Zhong Q, Zhang S et al (2014) Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 from coal-fired flue gas by catalytic oxidation-removal process with H2O2. Chem Eng J 243:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Yi et al (2010) Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NO using M/NaClO2 complex absorbent. Chem Eng J 160(1):42–47

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu J, Ye S, Bai J et al (2015) A concise algorithm for calculating absorption height in spray tower for wet limestone–gypsum flue gas desulfurization. Fuel Process Technol 129:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tian H et al (2021) Simultaneous magnesia regeneration and sulfur dioxide generation in magnesium-based flue gas desulfurization process. J Cleaner Prod 284:124720

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andreasen A, Mayer S (2007) Use of seawater scrubbing for SO2 removal from marine engine exhaust gas. Energy Fuels 21(6):3274–3279

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao X, Ding H, Du Z et al (2010) Gas–liquid absorption reaction between (NH4)2SO3 solution and SO2 for ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization. Appl Energy 87(8):2647–2651

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kallinikos L et al (2010) Simulation of the operation of an industrial wet flue gas desulfurization system. Fuel Process Technol 91(12):1794–1802

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sander R (2015) Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 15(8):4399–4981

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whiteman W (1923) The two-film theory of gas absorption. Chem Metal Eng 29(1):147–157

    Google Scholar 

  14. Higbie R (1935) The rate of absorption of a pure gas into still liquid during short periods of exposure. Am Inst Chem Eng 31:365–389

    Google Scholar 

  15. Danckwerts P (1970) Gas-liquid reaction. McGraw-Hill Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Gao W et al (2021) Simulation of SO2 absorption and performance enhancement of wet flue gas desulfurization system. Process Saf Environ Prot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao X, Guo R, Ding H et al (2009) Dissolution rate of limestone for wet flue gas desulfurization in the presence of sulfite. J Hazard Mater 168(2–3):1059–1064

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y (2012) Experimental study on the promoting dissolution of limestone and strengthening SO2 absorption by WFGD additives. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo R (2008) Study on the effects of limestone reactivity and flow field on wet flue gas desulfurization efficiency. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo R, Gao X, Wang J et al (2007) Reactivity of limestone in wet flue gas desulfurization system. J Combust Sci Technol 06:485–490 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yue L, Jin D, Xu Z (2003) Transition of shape and crystallization type of CaCO3 composite synthesized by co-precipitation method. Acta Chim Sinica 61(10):1587–1591 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hong Y (2020) Study on wet flue gas desulfurization based on pH control technology. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mori T, Matsuda S, Nakajima F et al (1981) Effect of Al3+ and F− on desulfurization reaction in the limestone slurry scrubbing process. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 20(1):144–147

    Google Scholar 

  24. Electric utility engineer’s FGD manual. Volume 1: FGD process design. Final report, 4 Mar 1996, United States. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc695907/

  25. Liu C, Zhao Z, Gao W et al (2021) Process optimization of S (IV) oxidation in flue gas desulfurization scrubbers. Process Saf Environ Prot 149(3):610–618

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huo W (2009) Mechanism research on the absorption, oxidation and crystallization in the process of limestone-gypsum WFGD. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gerbec M, Stergarsek A, Kocjancic R (1995) Simulation model of wet flue gas desulphurization plant. Comput Chem Eng 19(Supplement 1):283–286

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fick’s LM, Law G-K (2000) Formula, and Heisenberg’s equation of motion. Phys Rev Lett 85(12):2422–2425

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fuller E, Schettler P, Giddings J (1966) New method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients. Ind Eng Chem 58(5):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gao X, Huo W, Zhong Y et al (2008) Effects of magnesium and ferric ions on crystallization of calcium sulfate dihydrate under the simulated conditions of wet flue-gas desulfurization. Chem Res Chin Univ 24(6):688–693

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong Y, Gao X, Huo W et al (2008) A model for performance optimization of wet flue gas desulfurization systems of power plants. Fuel Process Technol 89(11):1025–1032

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stefan O et al (1993) A model for the absorption of sulphur dioxide into a limestone slurry. Chem Eng J 51(2):99–108

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tseng P, Rochelle G (1986) Calcium sulfite hemihydrate: crystal growth rate and crystal habit. Environ Prog 5(1):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pasiuk-Bronikowska W, Rudziński KJ (1991) Absorption of SO2 into aqueous systems. Chem Eng Sci 46(9):2281–2291

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li C, Zhang J, Zhang Y et al (2015) Removal efficiency of high sulfur dioxide in WFGD based on dual-pH value control. Acta Sci Circum 35(12):4081–4087

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frandsen JB, Kiil S et al (2001) Optimization of a wet FGD pilot plant using fine limestone and organic acids. Chem Eng Sci 56(10):3275–3287

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xu C, Wu C, Duan S et al (2014) Research of composite additive on high efficient desulfurization. Energy Eng 4:53–58 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pan S et al (2017) Development of high-gravity technology for removing particulate and gaseous pollutant emissions: principles and applications. J Clean Prod 149:540–556

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lin Y (2006) Study on large scale limestone-gypsum spraying desulphurization technology and project application. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen X (2008) Experimental study on desulfurization and nitrification in spray scrubber. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong Y (2008) Theoretical and experimental study of simultaneous removal of sulfur, nitrogen and mercury pollutant in WFGD system. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin F, Wang Z, Zhang Z et al (2020) Flue gas treatment with ozone oxidation: an overview on NOx, organic pollutants, and mercury. Chem Eng J 382:123030

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dora J, Gostomczyk M, Jakubiak M et al (2009) Parametric studies of the effectiveness of NO oxidation process by ozone. Chem Process Eng 30(4):621–633

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Z, Zhou J, Zhu Y et al (2007) Simultaneous removal of NOx, SO2 and Hg in nitrogen flow in a narrow reactor by ozone injection: experimental results. Fuel Process Technol 88(8):817–823

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zheng C, Xu C, Zhang Y et al (2014) Nitrogen oxide absorption and nitrite/nitrate formation in limestone slurry for WFGD system. Appl Energy 129(Sept 15):187–194

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gao X, Du Z, Ding H et al (2010) Kinetics of NOx absorption into (NH4)2SO3 solution in an ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization process. Chem Commun 24(11):3996–4015

    Google Scholar 

  47. Karkront H, Rosenberg H (1984) Flue gas denitrification. Selective catalytic oxidation of nitric oxide to nitrous oxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 23(4):808–814

    Google Scholar 

  48. Corro G, Elizalde M, Velasco A (2002) Promotional effect of Sn on NO oxidation over Pt/Al2O3 as promising gas exhaust catalytic converter. Selective Pt and Sn dispersion determination. React Kinet Catal Lett 76(1):117–122

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ichiura H, Kitaoka T, Tanaka H (2003) Photocatalytic oxidation of NOx using composite sheets containing TiO2 and a metal compound. Chemosphere 51(9):855–860

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kim H, Han J, Kawaguchi I et al (2007) Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 by a nonthermal plasma hybrid reactor. Energy Fuels 21(1):141–144

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li K, Tang X, Yi H et al (2011) Mechanism of catalytic oxidation of NO over Mn–Co–Ce–Ox catalysts with the aid of nonthermal plasma at low temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(19):11023–11028

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mok Y (2004) Oxidation of NO to NO2 using the ozonization method for the improvement of selective catalytic reduction. J Chem Eng Jpn Off Publ Soc Chem Eng 37(11):1337–1344

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng C, Xu C, Gao X et al (2014) Simultaneous absorption of NOx and SO2 in oxidant-enhanced limestone slurry. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 33(4):1171–1179

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Hayakawa N et al (1977) Absorption of NO in aqueous solutions of KMnO4. Chem Eng Sci 32(10):1171–1175

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu C (2014) Experimental study on the integrated and intensive absorption of NOx/SO2 from coal-fired flue gas. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  56. He S, Zhou J, Zhu Y et al (2010) Effect of vanadium-based selective catalytic reduction catalysts on mercury speciation transformation. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 44(09):1773–1780 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zheng C, Wang L, Zhang Y et al (2017) Partitioning of hazardous trace elements among air pollution control devices in ultra-low-emission coal-fired power plants. Energy Fuels 31(6):6334–6344

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zheng C, Xu L, Liu S et al (2018) Speciation and thermal stability of mercury in solid products from ultra-low emission air pollution control devices. Energy Fuels 32(12):12655–12664

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sui Z, Zhang Y, Li W et al (2015) Partitioning effect of mercury content and speciation in gypsum slurry as a function of time. J Therm Anal Calorim 119(3):1611–1618

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lin F (2018) Basic characteristics study on NOx deep removal in the flue gas by active molecules (ozone)-catalytic method. Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Gao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Zhejiang University Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gao, X., Zheng, C., Chiang, PC., Cen, K. (2021). Pollutant Control by Absorption Methods. In: Multi-Pollutant Control for Flue Gases. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China, vol 63. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1518-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1518-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1516-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1518-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics