Skip to main content

Subjectivity, Psychology, Marxism and Critical Realism: Eleven Theses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theory of Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Standpoint

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research ((PCHR,volume 9))

Abstract

This paper traces through the fraught relationship between psychology and Marxism through a reading of current critical debates in the discipline through Marx’s 1845 eleven ‘Theses on Feuerbach’. These theses enable us to grasp how Marxism tackles questions ranging from the relation between the individual and the social to social constructionism and discourse and then, crucially, to ‘critical realism’ in relation to psychology. Questions of behaviour, cognition and biology, as well as the radical status of psychoanalysis in relation to psychology are explored. These eleven theses radically rework human agency, providing an innovative basis for working inside psychology, but also, most importantly, for appreciating how necessary it is to work against psychology. Psychology as a discipline interprets the world, and we learn through Marx that is necessary to change it, in the process dispensing with psychology as such. We must remember that psychology is not a scientific discipline, and cannot become so. It is, as Fernando González Rey reminds us, a discipline concerned with the nature of subjectivity. What is clear is that any realist approach to human action should be undertaken outside the discipline, not inside it. We approach the task of taking subjectivity seriously through Marx’s eleven theses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arfken, M. (Ed.). (2011). Marxism and psychology special issue, Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 9. https://discourseunit.com/annual-review/9-2011/. Accessed 11 July 2018.

  • Bem, S. (1990). Cognitive representations and intentionality and the realism-relativism controversy. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. II). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1979). Psychology, racism and fascism. Birmingham: Searchlight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1982). Ideology and social psychology: Extremism, moderation and contradiction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. M. (1990). All hail the great abstraction: Star Wars and the politics of cognitive psychology. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. M. (1991). Time, representation and power/knowledge: Towards a critique of cognitive science as a knowledge-producing practice. In I. Parker (Ed.) (2011), Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology, volume 1, dominant models of psychology and their limits. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (Ed.). (1973). Radical psychology. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2017). Deconstructing developmental psychology (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2018). Fanon, education, action: Child as method. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1973). For reasons of state. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1984). That’s Funny, you don’t look anti-semitic: An anti-racist analysis of left anti-semitism. Leeds: Beyond the Pale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. (1986). Marxism and psychotherapy. Science and Society, 50(1), 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, C. (1991). Experimentation and planning in community care. Disability, Handicap and Society, 6(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1976). On the behavioral analysis of self-deception and self-development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), The self: Psychological and philosophical issues. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Z. (1979). Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1982). The sociology of psychological knowledge, the genetic interpretation of IQ, and Marxist-Leninist ideology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 449–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1932). The method and function of an analytic social psychology: Notes on psychoanalysis and historical materialism. In A. Arato & E. Gebhardt (Eds.) (1978), The essential Frankfurt school reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geras, N. (1983). Marx and human nature. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive Psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Rey, F. (2014). Advancing further the history of Soviet psychology: Moving forward from dominant representations in Western and Soviet psychology. History of Psychology, 17(1), 60–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • González Rey, F. (2017). The topic of subjectivity in psychology: Contradictions, paths and new alternatives. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(4), 502–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Rey, F. (2018). Subjectivity and discourse: Complementary topics for a critical psychology. Culture and Psychology, Online. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18754338.

  • González Rey, F., Mitjáns Martínez, A., & Magalhães Goulart, D. (Eds.). (2019). Subjectivity within cultural-historical approach: Theory, methodology and research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1972). The philosophies of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1974). Blueprint for a new science. In N. Armistead (Ed.), Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal powers. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. (1990). Psychology. In M. J. Buhle, P. Buhle, & D. Georgakas (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American left. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, D. (1970). Ideology and the human sciences: Some comments on the role of reification in psychology and psychiatry. Human Context, 2, 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1983). Social amnesia. New York: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1986). The repression of psychoanalysis: Otto Fenichel and the post-Freudians. New York: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kovel, J. (2007). The enemy of nature: The end of capitalism or the end of the world? (2nd Rev ed.). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda, F. (2015). Critical psychology and human emancipation: Identifying catalysts for building critical social theory. In S. Tuleski (Ed.), Liberation psychology in Brazil (pp. 41–54). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P. (1984). Personality and ideology: Towards a materialist understanding of the individual. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1919–1923). History and class consciousness. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/history/index.htm. Accessed 11 July 2018.

  • Marcuse, H. (1955/1974). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1843). On the Jewish question. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/index.htm. Accessed 5 July 2020.

  • Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. Available at www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm. Accessed 5 July 2020.

  • Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, P. (1982). Lucien Seve, Althusser and the contradictions of the PCF. Critique, 15, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, D., Pavón-Cuéllar, D., & Moncada, L. (Eds). (2015). Marxism and psychology II Special Issue, Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 12. https://discourseunit.com/annual-review/12-2015/. Accessed 11 July 2018

  • Palmer, A. (1987). Cognitivism and computer simulation. In A. Costall & A. Still (Eds.), Cognitive psychology in question. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (Eds.). (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2015). Critical discursive psychology (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I., & Spears, R. (Eds.). (1996). Psychology and society: Radical theory and practice. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavón Cuéllar, D. (2017). Marxism and psychoanalysis: In or against psychology? London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (1971). Totalitarianism and individualism in psychology. Telos, 7, 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. (1929). Dialectical materialism and psychoanalysis. In L. Baxandall (Ed.) (1972), Sex-pol essays 1929–1934. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudinesco, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan and Co.: The history of psychoanalysis in France—1936–1986. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1984). Psychology and social control. Cognition, 17, 29–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1975). Images of man in psychological research. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1987). Cognitive psychology, “Taylorism” and the manufacture of unemployment. In A. Costall & A. Still (Eds.), Cognitive psychology in question. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948/1962). Walden two. Toronto: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe, W. E. (1990). Mental representation and meaning: Arguments against the computational view. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. II). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W. (1979). Marx’s “Theses on Feuerbach”: A new translation and notes towards a commentary. In J. Mepham & D.-H. Ruben (Eds), Issues in Marxist philosophy, Vol IV: Materialism. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpanaro, S. (1976). On materialism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, C., & Maiers, W. (Eds.). (1991). Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triesman, A. (1974). The radical use of official data. In N. Armistead (Ed.), Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Parker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parker, I. (2021). Subjectivity, Psychology, Marxism and Critical Realism: Eleven Theses. In: Goulart, D.M., Martínez, A.M., Adams, M. (eds) Theory of Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Standpoint. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1417-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics