Abstract
Mediation from soft diplomacy to foreign policy In this chapter we will explore how Qatar gained its current title as a “trusted partner” through mediation. Running in the 2nd decade of its enriched journey, where it was started from north of Yemen mountains passing by Lebanon, Sudan, Djibouti, Palestine until the most recent mediation between Taliban and Afghani government. There are many examples for Qatar mediation roles, it happened where Qatar mediated between countries and other actors, in partnership with other allies and global, continental, regional, and sub regional organizations. As it’s a principle in Qatar foreign policy to comply diplomatic efforts with UN principles and international law. On the other hand, tools and potentials that made Qatar recognition as a successful mediator are a complexity of various things such, widely strong political connections, huge financial resources, reliability and impartiality. Involving in mediation for Qatar wasn’t easy task, as its always stuffed with unpredicted challenges coming from several geopolitical factors along with other variations. We will demonstrate some of these challenges and how it affects the whole processes and initiatives. Also, Impartiality principle sometimes leads to dilemmas where it requires tremendous efforts and resources to solve issues and bring parties back to negotiations, this includes but not limited to, shuttling diplomacy, huge financial resources, multilateral diplomacy and sometimes coaching and trainings for some parties to narrow the differences and pave the way for middle ground. Mediation in Qatar case made fruit of soft diplomacy and created a high profile for the small gulf country, however this has created some negative competition from some neighbors who is ready to destroy any achievement no matter what is the lost just to undermine the efforts been made. And this been the case; honesty, transparency and dignity always played a key role to contain tensions. Spoilers repeatedly showing up regardless their goals, mostly its conflict of interests is the driver behind those, but sometimes it’s just change resistance and fear of future specially with elites lived long time in conflict. The theoretical model of Qatar mediation strategy, is yet to be identified by scholars and all what has been written “personally” is descriptive reports with some analysis built on relative articles and publications. n conclusion although that many has described Qatar mediation as branding the name of the country to be present on the intl. system map and others said the cause is being granted this role by super powers to implement policies in the region, there are deeper facts than what been stated. The strategic depth of Qatar is quite limited toward gulf both edges which has KSA on one side and Iran on the other. This critical geopolitical position dictates a special foreign policy which secure the tiny state from two big neighbors and other possible threats. Which make mediation part of protective measures that strengthen Qatar international ties and likely help preventing any possible threat like what happened 5th of June (A report appeared in the Foreign Policy Magazine has again exposed designs of Saudi Arabia to invade Qatar one day after imposition of June 5, 2017 blockade against Qatar by the quartet).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The Arabic term ‘Sheikh’ translates to ‘old man’ and is also the title for the head of State.
- 3.
The Permanent Constitution of the State of Qatar. Available online at: https://www.almeezan.qa/LawArticles.aspx?LawTreeSectionID=6673&lawId=2284&language=en.
- 4.
In politics, international relations. It is the global constellation of states. The term is commonly applied to the international systems of the Twentieth century and can equally be applied to pre industrial international state system.
- 5.
Some countries have boundaries defined by nature, others are arbitrarily established lines. Some governments have little or no restrictions on going to or coming from a neighbor, while others have built walls to protect their borders. Geopolitics have a lot of influence on how a country deals with its boundaries.
- 6.
Shuttling diplomacy: Cambridge Dictionary, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/shuttle-diplomacy.
- 7.
The Cold War was a period of geopolitical tension between the Soviet Union and the United States and their respective allies, the Eastern Bloc and the Western Bloc, after World War II. Historians do not fully agree on the dates, but the period is generally considered to span the 1947 Truman Doctrine to the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union. The doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) discouraged a pre-emptive attack by either side. Aside from the nuclear arsenal development and conventional military deployment, the struggle for dominance was expressed via indirect means such as psychological warfare, propaganda campaigns, espionage, far-reaching embargoes, rivalry at sports events and technological competitions such as the Space Race.
- 8.
In international relations, non-state actors (NSAs) are individuals or groups that hold influence and which are wholly or partly independent of a sovereign state or state.
- 9.
- 10.
The Houthi movement, officially called Ansar Allah and colloquially simply Houthis, is an Islamic political and armed movement that emerged from Sa'dah in northern Yemen in the 1990 s. The movement was called Houthis because its founder is from the Houthi tribe. They are of the Zaidi school, though the movement also includes Sunnis. Under the leadership of Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi.
- 11.
Author’s communication with Yemen’s Minister of Human Rights Wahiba Fara’a, Sanaa, August 2010.
- 12.
Former Qatari Prime minister interview with Qatar television, 25 October 2017, https://youtu.be/bBZph3LVs5g, accessed on 10 October 2020.
- 13.
Senior MOFA official, interview; author’s interview with Hayder Ibrahim, Director of the Center of Sudanese Studies, Doha, April 2012.
- 14.
Hayder Ibrahim, interview.
- 15.
Author’s communication with a group of Darfuri civil society leaders who took part in the Doha negotiations, Addis Ababa, February 2014.
- 16.
Qatari former official.
- 17.
Article no. 7, Qatar constitution 2005.
- 18.
As this volume contains a full chapter on Palestine, this section will not provide much background information and will focus on the mediation role only.
- 19.
Palestinian National Liberation Movement.
- 20.
The Oslo Accords are a pair of agreements between the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): the Oslo I Accord, signed in Washington, DC, in 1993; and the Oslo II Accord, signed in Taba, Egypt, in 1995. The Oslo Accords marked the start of the Oslo process, a peace process aimed at achieving a peace treaty based on United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, and at fulfilling the “right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.” The Oslo process started after secret negotiations in Oslo, resulting in the recognition by the PLO of the State of Israel and the recognition by Israel of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and as a partner in negotiations.
- 21.
A report appeared in the Foreign Policy Magazine has again exposed designs of Saudi Arabia to invade Qatar one day after imposition of June 5, 2017 blockade against Qatar by the quartet.
References
Ahmad, J. (2018, December 30). Taliban dismiss Afghanistan’s peace talks offer. Reuters. Available online at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban-idUSKCN1OT051.
Akpınar, P. (2015). Mediation as a foreign policy tool in the Arab Spring: Turkey, Qatar and Iran. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 17(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2015.1063270.
Al Arabia News. (2014). https://www.alarabiya.net/ar/arab-and-world/2014/04/23/ .
Al Jazeera. (2020a, August 31). Sudan signs peace deal with rebel groups from Darfur. Available online at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/8/31/sudan-signs-peace-deal-with-rebel-groups-from-darfur.
Al Jazeera. (2020b, September 9). Talks between Afghan government and Taliban open in Qatar. Available online at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/12/talks-between-afghan-government-and-taliban-open-in-qatar.
al-Horr, A. M., Tok, M. E., & Gagoshidze, T. (2019). Rethinking soft power in the post-blockade times: The case of Qatar. Digest of Middle East Studies, 28(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12188.
Al Khaleej Online. https://alkhaleejonline.net/ .
Alkhater, L. (2017). Qatar against the blockade executive summary report 12-2017. Social and Economic Survey Research Institute (SESRI) Qatar University http://www.qu.edu.qa/file_source/qu/research/SESRI/documents/Publications/17/B5%20Booklet%20-%20Qatar%20Against%20the%20Blockade.pdf.
Alkhater, L. (2020, October 21). Small states in a contested era: A Qatari perspective. https://mei.nus.edu.sg/event/2020-s-r-nathan-distinguished-lecture/.
Al-Muftah, H. (2019). Qatar’s response to the crisis: Public diplomacy as a means of crisis management. In A. Krieg (Ed.), Divided Gulf: The anatomy of a crisis (pp. 233–250). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6314-6_14.
Aspinall, E. (2007). The construction of grievance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(6), 950–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707307120.
Barakat, S. (2014). Qatari mediation: Between ambition and achievement. Brookings Doha Center.
Barakat, S., & Milton, S. (2019). Qatar: Conflict mediation and regional objectives. Chapter in A Paczyńska (Ed.), The new politics of aid: Emerging donors and conflict-affected states. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
BBC News. (2008, June 13). France backing Djibouti in ‘war’.
Bercovitch, J., & Rubin, J. (1994). Mediation in international relations: Multiple approaches to conflict management. Singapore: Springer.
Dakhlallah, F. (2012). The league of the Arab states and regional security: Towards an Arab security community? British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 39(3), 393–412.
Doostmohammadi, A., Mousavi, S. A., & Beigloo, J. A. S. (2012). A study of the causes of wars between the government and the Shiites of Yemen based on “Fuzzy Cognitive Maps”. Journal of International and Area Studies, 19(1), 97–114.
Duursma, A. (2020). African solutions to African challenges: The role of legitimacy in mediating Civil Wars in Africa. International Organization, 74(2), 295–330.
Eckhoff, T. (1966). The mediator and the judge. Acta Sociologica, 10, 158.
Enough Project. (2010, April 6). The Darfur peace process: Recipe for a bad deal?. Available online at: http://www.enoughpro-ject.org/publications/update-doha.
Foreign Policy. (2020, August 6). How Israel emerged as an unlikely peacemaker in the middle east. Foreign Policy. Available online at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/06/how-israel-emerged-as-an-unlikely-peacemaker-in-the-middle-east/.
Gallopin, J.-B. (2020, June 16). The great game of the UAE and Saudi Arabia in Sudan. European Council on Foreign Relations.
Gulf Times. (2020, September 11). Qatar sends more aid to Sudan. Available online at: https://www.gulf-times.com/story/672626/Qatar-sends-more-aid-to-Sudan.
Hassan, Ahmad Ali. (2017, October 13). Palestinian dividend roots “Fatah negotiation and Hamas resistance”. Alkhaleej online. https://alkhaleejonline.net/ .
ICG. (2014). Sudan’s spreading conflict (III): The limits of Darfur’s peace process (Africa Report No. 211). International Crisis Group. Available online at: http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/africa/horn-of-africa/sudan/211-sudan-s-spreading-conflict-iii-the-limits-of-darfur-s-peace-process.aspx.
IslamWeb. (2019, September 26). The virtue of reconciling people. Available online at: https://www.islamweb.org/en/article/214492/the-virtue-of-reconciling-people.
Issacharoff, A. (2018, August 27). Egypt and Qatar are working on 2 very different deals for Gaza; both are stalled. The Times of Israel. Available online at: https://www.timesofisrael.com/egypt-and-qatar-are-working-on-2-very-different-deals-for-gaza-both-are-stalled/#gs.g9vrev.
Jibril, A. (2010). Past and future of UNAMID: Tragic failure or glorious success? (HAND Briefing Paper). Darfur Relief and Documentation Centre. Available online at: http://migs.concordia.ca/links/documents/Past_and_Future_of_UNAMID.pdf.
Jones, L. (2011, July 19). Doha agreement could actually Worsen chances for peace in Darfur. Christian Science Monitor. Available online at: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Af-rica-Monitor/2011/0719/Doha-agreement-could-actually-worsen-chances-for-peace-in-Darfur.
Kamrava, M. (2011). Mediation and Qatari foreign policy. The Middle East Journal, 65(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.3751/65.4.11.
Kamrava, M. (2013). Qatar: Small state, big politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
Kirazli, S. (2011). Conflict and conflict resolution in the pre-Islamic Arab society. Islamic Studies, 50(1) (Spring), 25–53.
Malley, R. (2018, June 7). What happens in the Gulf doesn’t stay in the Gulf. The Atlantic. Available online at:” https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/somalia-gulf-crisis-vegas-rules/562292/?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share.
Melin, M. (2013). When states mediate. Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs, 2(4), 78–90.
Qatar Government Communications Office. (2020). HH the Amir’s speech at the 75th session of the United Nations General assembly. Available online at: https://www.gco.gov.qa/en/speeches/his-highness-speech-at-the-75th-unga/.
Reuters. (2012, October 23). Second Darfur Rebel Group joins peace talks with Sudan. Reuters. Available online at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/23/us-sudan-darfur-qatar-idUS-BRE89M1BH20121023.
Reuters. (2020, August 9). Key dates since the start of the 2001 war in Afghanistan and efforts to broker peace. Available online at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban-timeline-idUSKCN2550G5.
Salmoni, Barak, Loidolt, Bryce, & Wells, Madeleine. (2010). Regime and periphery in Northern Yemen: The Houthi phenomenon. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
State Department. (2020, March 6). Joint statement on the signing of the U.S.-Taliban agreement. U.S. Department of State. Available online at: https://www.state.gov/joint-statement-on-the-signing-of-the-u-s-taliban-agreement/.
Sudan Tribune. (2011, August 2). Sudan to hold a donor conference for Darfur development in October. Sudan Tribune. Available online at: http://www.reliefweb.int/node/438398.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2020). Rebalancing regional security in the Persian Gulf. Baker Institute. https://doi.org/10.25613/N8XE-HJ20.
UN. 2012. United Nations guidance for effective mediation. United Nations.
UNSC. (2008, June 12). Peace and security in Africa S/PV/5908 (Verbatim Report 5908). United Nations Security Council.
Walid, T. (2009, October 29). Qatar SWF food unit eyes PAVA stake, seals sudan deal. Reuters. Available online at: http://af.reuters.com/article/invest-ingNews/idAFJOE59S0LW20091029?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0.
White House. (2017, August 21). Remarks by President Trump on the strategy in Afghanistan and South Asia. WhiteHouse.gov. Available online at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-strategy-afghanistan-south-asia/.
Williams, P, & Simpson, M. (2011). Drafting in Doha: An assessment of the Darfur peace process and ceasefire agreements. Chapter in Melanne Civic and Michael Miklaucic (Eds.), Monopoly of Force: The Nexus of DDR and SSR (pp. 41–60)Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
Worth, R. (2008, July 9). Qatar, playing all sides, is a nonstop mediator. The New York Times.
Young, O. R. (1967). The intermediaries: Third parties in international crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alqashouti, M. (2021). Qatar Mediation: From Soft Diplomacy to Foreign Policy. In: Zweiri, M., Al Qawasmi, F. (eds) Contemporary Qatar. Gulf Studies, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1391-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1391-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1390-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1391-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)