Skip to main content

Nature-Oriented Paradigms for Urban Water Security: Perspective on Framework, Scale, and Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Water Resources and Transportation Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 149))

  • 461 Accesses

Abstract

Water security in urban areas is threatened by a multitude of direct and indirect drivers. On the one hand, the demand for water is increasing on a daily basis as the urban population and lifestyle needs increase; on the other hand, events such as floods, tropical cyclones, and other natural hazards result in disruption of water provisioning systems and processes. Additionally, climate change impacts such as heat waves and sea-level rise affect the sustainability of water supplies in urban areas. Conventionally, hard engineering structures and strategies have been implemented around the world to address water needs in urban areas and solutions that are often costly and intrusive to the natural environment. Nature-based solutions (NBS) in the past years emerged as a framework for exploring the potential of soft engineering solutions—as an alternative for managing urban planning, building climate resilience, and sustaining water needs of the urban communities. In this chapter, the following points are explained: (a) review of selected nature-oriented conceptual framings and practical options that apply to urban water systems, (b) illustration of existing NBS practices such as permeable pavements, green roofs, and bioretention ponds in urban landscape architecture planning, and (c) future of urban landscapes with comparative context of traditional versus nature-based water management practices. The conclusion draws attention to the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) that is aiming to prevent, halt, and reverse the degradation of ecosystems globally. The aim is to present a synthesis that can steer integrated development planning while addressing basic water needs, climate resilience, and ecosystems protection in all settings and particularly in urban landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arkema KK, Abramson SC, Dewsbury BM (2006) Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Front Ecol Environ 4(10):525–32

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2016) Nature-based solutions for building resilience in towns and cities: case studies from the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mandaluyong City, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baig SP, Rizvi A, Josella M, Palanca-Tan R (2016) Cost and benefits of ecosystem-based adaptation: the case of the Philippines. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, viii, 32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browder G, Ozment S, Rehberger Bescos I, Gartner T, Lange GM (2019) Integrating green and gray: creating next generation infrastructure. World Bank and World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan FKS, Griffiths JA, Higgitt D, Xu S, Zhu F, Tang YT, Xu Y, Thorne CR (2018) “Sponge City” in China—a breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy 76:772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S, eds. (2016) Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das S, Vincent JR (2009) Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106(18):7357–7360

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doswald N, Osti M (2010) Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation and mitigation—good practice examples and lessons learned in Europe. Technical Report. The Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Global Water Partnership (GWP) (2017) The need for an integrated approach. https://www.gwp.org

  10. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018). https://www.greenclimate.fund

  11. Guannel G, Arkema K, Ruggiero P, Verutes G (2016) The power of three: coral reefs, seagrasses and mangroves protect coastal regions and increase their resilience. PLoS ONE 11(7):e0158094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoekstra AY, Buurman J, van Ginkel KCH (2018) Urban water security: a review. Environ Res Lett 13(5):053002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaba52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Horizon 2020 Expert Group for EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2015) Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. European Union.https://doi.org/10.2777/765301

  14. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2018) Mangrove plantation in Viet Nam: measuring impact and cost benefit

    Google Scholar 

  15. IWA (International Water Association) (2016) The IWA principles for water wise cities. https://iwa-network.org

  16. Jenkins M, Gammie G, Cassin J (2016) Peru approves new innovative environmental policies

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kabisch N, Stadler J, Korn H, Bonn A (2016) Nature-based Solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kathiresan K, Rajendran N (2005) Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuarine Coast Shelf Sci 65(3):601–606

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leslie HM, McLeod KL (2007) Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front Ecol Environ 5(10):540–548

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu L, Fryd O, Zhang S (2019) Blue-green infrastructure for sustainable urban stormwater management—lessons from six municipality-led pilot projects in Beijing and Copenhagen. Water 11(10):2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagabhatla N, Metcalfe CD (2018) Multifunctional wetlands: pollution abatement and other ecological services from natural and constructed wetlands (environmental contamination remediation and management). Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67416-2

  22. Olivier J, Probst K, Renner I, Riha K (2013) Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA). Global Water Partnership

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ozment S, DiFrancesco K, Gartner T (2015) The role of natural infrastructure in the water, energy and food nexus. Nexus dialogue synthesis papers. IUCN, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozment, S, Ellison, G, Jongman, B (2019) Nature-based solutions for disaster risk management. The World Bank. Booklet No. 134847

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raymond CM, Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N, Berry P, Breil M, Nita MR, Geneletti D, Calfapietra C (2017) A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ Sci Policy 77:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008

  26. Revi A, Satterthwaite DE, Aragón-Durand F, Corfee-Morlot J, Kiunsi RBR, Pelling M, Roberts DC, Solecki W (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds), vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 535–612. ISBN: 9781107058163

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ritchie H (2018) Urbanization. Our world in data

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roth R (2013) Natural infrastructure: a climate-smart solution

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sandford R (2017) The human face of water insecurity. In: Devlaeminck D, Adeel Z, Sandford R (eds) The human face of water security. Springer, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50161-1

  30. Sudmeier-Rieux K, Ash N, Murti R (2013) Environmental guidance note for disaster risk reduction. IUCN, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  31. The World Bank (2017). https://www.worldbank.org

  32. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2020) https://www.decadeonrestoration.org

  33. Thupalli R, Deen TA (2017) An investment strategy for reducing disaster risks and coastal pollution using nature based solutions. In: Nagabhatla N, Metcalfe CD (eds) Multifunctional wetlands: pollution abatement and other ecological services from natural and constructed wetlands. Springer, pp 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67416-2_5

  34. UN-HABITAT (2017) New urban agenda. Report number: A/RES/71/256

    Google Scholar 

  35. UN-HABITAT (2014) The state of latin american and caribbean cities 2012: towards a new urban transition. Report number: HS/063/12E

    Google Scholar 

  36. UN-Water (2013). https://www.unwater.org

  37. UNDESA (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. Report number: ST/ESA/SER.A/352

    Google Scholar 

  38. UNDRR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030

    Google Scholar 

  39. UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

  40. UNISDR (2015) https://www.preventionweb.net

  41. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Report number: A/RES/70/1

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yu X, Jiang L (2009) Freshwater management and climate change adaptation: experiences from the central Yangtze in China. Climate Dev.https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2009.0023

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors of this chapter have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Negin Balaghi-Ficzkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annexure 1. Examples of Different Concepts Related to NBS (Data Source: Thupalli and Deen [33] and World Resource Institute forum on NBS (2018) and World Bank)

NBS category

Sub-category

Projects

Natural/ecological systems

Urban ecosystem restoration

• Ecological restoration

• Ecological engineering

• Forest landscape restoration

This approach focuses on the recovery of degraded, damaged/ destroyed ecosystem in urban environments. City of Santa Maria in California, USA (Community-Based Restoration Projects supported by NASA)

• Riverbeds and banks

• Sandy beaches and dunes

• Upland forests

Sector/resource-specific urban ecosystem-related approaches

• Ecosystem-based adaptation

• Ecosystem-based mitigation

• Climate adaptation services

• Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction

Ecosystem-related approaches vary based on their objective (C.f. [3], Doswald and Osti [8]; Olivier et al. [22])

• Floodplains and bypasses or urban flood control

• Forest restoration for carbon sequestration

• Constructed wetlands

• Inland wetlands

Urban infrastructure-related approaches

• Natural infrastructure

• Green infrastructure

Commonly notes in cities (C.f. Ozment et al. [23], Roth [28]) help restore and filter stormwater, avoid cost of stormwater runoff, capture and slow local precipitation, provide energy-saving option for the building

• Parks, open spaces, conservation areas

• Green roofs

Permeable pavements

Urban ecosystem-based management approaches at large scale and resource governance frameworks

• Integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)

• Integration water resource management (IWRM)

IWRM, and ICZM embeds the ecosystem-based management and ecosystem protection aspects of conservation and integrated management (c.f. Arkema et al. [1], Leslie and McLeod [19])

• Coastal wetlands

• Mangrove forests

• Reefs

• Salt marches

Annexure 2. Commitments Outlined in the New Urban Agenda [34]

Commitment

Description

Providing basic services for all citizens

These services include access to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation

Promoting measures that support cleaner cities

Tackling air pollution in cities by increasing the use of renewable energy, providing greener public transport, and sustainably managing the natural resources

Strengthening resilience in cities to reduce the risk and the impact of disaster

Leaders have now committed to implement mitigation and adaptation measures to minimize the impacts of natural disasters. These measures include urban planning, quality infrastructure, and improving local responses for safety and environmental sustainability

Taking action to address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions

Sustainable cities that reduce emissions from energy and build resilience can play a lead role. Leaders committed to involve with local governments and all actors of society to take climate change action and considering the Paris Agreement on climate change

Improving connectivity and support innovative and green initiatives

This includes establishing partnerships with businesses and civil society to find sustainable solutions to urban water challenges in case of flooding or any other risk disaster

Promoting safe, accessible, and green public space

Sustainable urban design plays a key role in ensuring the livability and prosperity of a city. The agenda calls for an increase in public spaces to facilitate human interaction by urban planning

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balaghi-Ficzkowski, N., Nagabhatla, N., Deen, T.A. (2021). Nature-Oriented Paradigms for Urban Water Security: Perspective on Framework, Scale, and Sector. In: Mehta, Y.A., Carnacina, I., Kumar, D.N., Rao, K.R., Kumari, M. (eds) Advances in Water Resources and Transportation Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 149. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1303-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1303-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1302-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1303-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics