Abstract
Reservoir surveillance is one of the key tasks for any gas field development to understand its reservoir size, connectivity, porosity and permeability characteristics, and boundaries. Pressure transient test is the most widely used method, which provides all information above to support selecting the appropriate asset development strategies. Unfortunately, for fields with horizontal/high deviated wells and/or high H2S (sour gas) reservoirs, downhole pressure data can’t be easily acquired due to safety and cost-effective reasons. In addition, for gas fields with high deliverability and production demand, wells are required to open most of the time thus pressure build-up tests are often not available. What to do to maximize the value of the available pressure transient tests information and to minimize the operational cost and execution risk?
This paper is to present the current experience at the Joint Venture gas project, utilizing deconvolution to improve the quality of pressure transient tests and expand understanding on reservoir characteristics. There are several advantages in applying this method: (a) no extra cost or production loss from closing wells for test, and therefore, no operational risk from it; (b) it improves the reliability of interpretation from existing tests, whose quality could be contaminated by offset well interference or raw data quality issue; and (c) it provides valuable information about reservoir boundary when this information is covered by offset well interference.
In brief, effective use of deconvolution is considered as the best practice of improving the reliability of pressure transient tests, and thus, improving the understanding and the quality of gas field reservoir surveillance program. It has no extra operational cost and risk since it is purely mathematical method. Case study will be shared.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vo, M., Yu, Y., Lv, J., Zhang, J.: Surface Pressure Data for Well-Test Analysis at a Joint Venture Gas Project in Sichuan (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7560-5_169
Cobanoglu, M., Shukri, I.: Challenges of pressure transient analysis PTA: uncertainty assessment and pitfalls in well test analysis-how much confidence does a PTA Interpretation Has? International Petroleum Technology Conference, 13 January 2020. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-20075-MS
Osman, Y., Retnanto, A., Samir, M., Fraim, M.: Enhancing Pressure Transient Analysis through the Application of Deconvolution Methods, Case Study. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 6 March 2017. https://doi.org/10.2118/184022-MS
Kappa. Dynamic Data Analysis v5.2, P77-P78
Von Schroeter, T., Hollaender, F., Gringarten, A.C.: Analysis of Well Test Data From Permanent Downhole Gauges by Deconvolution. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1 January 2002. https://doi.org/10.2118/77688-MS
Levitan, M.M.: Practical Application of Pressure-Rate Deconvolution to Analysis of Real Well Tests. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1 April 2005. https://doi.org/10.2118/84290-PA.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the management of UECSL for their permission to publish this paper. The authors also thank all the personnel who involved in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Van Vo, M., Yu, Y., Lv, Jj. (2021). Improving Gas Reservoir Understanding by Using Deconvolution. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2020. IFEDC 2020. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0762-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0761-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)