Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 407 Accesses

Abstract

In this research paper, a statistical exponential model was prepared for the determination of chip thickness during turning process of alloy steel by response surface methodology (RSM) with design of experiment method. The relationship between the chip thickness and machining conditions were analyzed. In the prediction of predictive models, cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and tool geometry (effective tool nose radius) were considered as input model variables and chip thickness was considered as response variable in the output form. The determined statistical model shows that the feed rate is the main influencing factor on chip thickness followed by tool nose radius and depth of cut. It increases with increase in feed rate but decreases with increase in cutting velocity and tool nose radius, respectively. The predicted values were found similar to the actual values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalpakjian S (2000) Manufacturing process for engineering materials, 3rd edn, pp 467–4727. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, Calif, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montgomery DC (2010) Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd edn. John Willy and Sons, New York, USA, pp 521–568

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou M, Chen Y, Zhang G (2020) Force prediction and cutting-parameter optimization in micro-milling Al7075-T6 based on response surface method. J Micro Mach 11(8):766. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11080766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu XH, Jia ZY, Wang H, Feng YX, Liang SY (2019) The effect of cutting parameters on micro-hardness and the prediction of Vickers hardness based on a response surface methodology for micro-milling Inconel 718. Measurement 140:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Przestacki D, Chwalczuk T, Wojciechowski S, (2017) The study on minimum uncut chip thickness and cutting forces during laser-assisted turning of WC/NiCr clad layers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:3887–3898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0035-5

  6. Abhang LB, Hameedullah M (2019) Wear behaviour of carbide tool during machining of steel SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332379

  7. Abhang LB, Hameedullah M (2011) Statistical modelling of surface roughness produced by wet turning using soluble-oil water mixture lubricant. Int J Manuf Mater Sci 1(1):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abhang LB, Hameedullah M (2010) Chip-tool interface temperature prediction model for turning process. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(4):382–393

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abhang LB, Hameedullah M (2011) Empirical modeling of turning parameters using grey relational analysis. Appl Mech Mater 110–116:2596–2603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhushan RK (2020) Multi-response optimization of parameters during turning of AA7075/ SiC composite for minimum surface roughness and maximum tool life. Silicon. doi: s12633-020-00640

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sreenivasulu R (2016) Taguchi based optimization for surface roughness and chip thickness during end milling process on aluminium 6351-t6 alloy. Independent J Manage Prod 7(4)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shultheiss F, Agmell M, Bushlya V, Stahl J-E (2018) Analysis of the minimum chip thickness during turning of duplex stainless steel. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar AR, Joshi KK, Das RK (2018) Analysis of chip reduction coefficient in turning of Ti-6Al-4 V ELI. In: The 3rd international conference on materials and manufacturing engineering. IOP Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra A (2016) Overview study of the machining of composite materials. Int J Res EngTechnol 4(7):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iqbal M, Tadjuddin M, Abhang LB (2020) Investigation of hole delamination in drillingkeblar composite panel using HSS drill tool. Defect Diffus Forum 402:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abhang LB, Iqbal M, Hameedullah M (2020) Optimization of machining process parameters using moora method. Defect Diffus Forum 402:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Minitab: version-18 Document, 2018, www.minitab.com

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their thanks to the Department of mechanical engineering (AMU), for providing the laboratory for conducting experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd. Iqbal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abhang, L.B., Iqbal, M., Hameedullah, M. (2021). An Experimental Model for the Prediction of Chip Thickness in Steel Turning. In: Akhyar (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Experimental and Computational Mechanics in Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0736-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0736-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0735-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0736-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics