Abstract
Within the corneal subspecialty, refractive surgery and progressive ectatic disorders have seen the most significant development in algorithms and implementation of machine learning for improving patient care. This chapter discusses the existing role of artificial intelligence in cornea and refractive surgery and scope for further development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Daxecker F. Christoph Scheiner’s eye studies. In: Henkes HE, editor. History of ophthalmology 5: sub auspiciis academiae ophthalmologicae internationalis. Dordrecht: Springer; 1993. p. 27–35.
Alarcón A, Rubiño M, Pééérez-Ocón F, Jiménez JR. Theoretical analysis of the effect of pupil size, initial myopic level, and optical zone on quality of vision after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(12):901–6.
Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the ectasia risk score system for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):813–8.
Ambrósio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P. Integration of scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–43.
Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):760–5.
Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:267–73.
Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(7):1007–9.
Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK. Neural network classification of corneal topography. Preliminary demonstration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36(7):1327–35.
Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:2290–9.
Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Screening of prior refractive surgery by a wavelet-based neural network. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1926–31.
Vieira de Carvalho LA, Barbosa MS. Neural networks and statistical analysis for classification of corneal videokeratography maps based on Zernike coefficients: a quantitative comparison. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71:337–41.
Belin MW, Khachikian SS. Keratoconus: it is hard to define, but. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:500–3.
Cairns G, McGhee CN. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:205–20.
Souza MB, Medeiros FW, Souza DB, Garcia R, Alves MR. Evaluation of machine learning classifiers in keratoconus detection from orbscan II examinations. Clinics. 2010;65:1223–8.
Nabney YT. Netlab: algorithms for pattern recognition. 4th ed. London: Springer; 2004.
Accardo PA, Pensiero S. Neural network-based system for early keratoconus detection from corneal topography. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35:151–9.
Kovács I, Miháltz K, Kránitz K, et al. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):275–83.
Lopes BT, Ramos IC, Salomão MQ, et al. Enhanced tomographic assessment to detect corneal ectasia based on artificial intelligence. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;195:223–32.
Ambrosio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–43.
Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:803–10.
Lavric A, Valentin P. KeratoDetect: Keratoconus detection algorithm using convolutional neural networks. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2019;2019:8162567.
Xie Y, Zhao L, Yang X, Wu X, Yang Y, Huang X, Liu F, Xu J, Lin L, Lin H, Feng Q, Lin H, Liu Q. Screening candidates for refractive surgery with corneal tomographic-based deep learning. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(5):519–26.
Yoo TK, Ryu IH, Lee G, et al. Adopting machine learning to automatically identify candidate patients for corneal refractive surgery. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:59.
Yoo TK, Ryu IH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee IS, Kim JS, Lee G, Rim TH. Explainable machine learning approach as a tool to understand factors used to select the refractive surgery technique on the expert level. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2020;9(2):8.
Koh YW, Celik T, Lee HK, Petznick A, Tong L. Detection of meibomian glands and classification of meibography images. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17(8):086008.
Remeseiro B, Penas M, Mosquera A, Novo J, Penedo MG, Yebra-Pimentel E. Statistical comparison of classifiers applied to the interferential tear film lipid layer automatic classification. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:207315.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grewal, S.S., Grewal, S.P.S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Cornea and Refractive Surgery. In: Ichhpujani, P., Thakur, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology. Current Practices in Ophthalmology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0634-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0634-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0633-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0634-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)