Abstract
The question about how the efficacy of different cataract treatments will ultimately come down to the evaluation of visual quality, in particular, the effect of the implantation of different types of IOL on visual quality [1–6]. The parameters provided by the OQAS II are also applicable to the comparison of the quality of retinal imaging after different types of IOL implantation, which provides an objective basis for the selection of IOLs in the clinic [7–10]. Physicians can compare the measured visual quality after implantation of different IOLs and then use the result to guide clinical treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sandoval HP, Fernandez de Castro LE, Vroman DT, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(12):1469–75.
Zeng M, Liu Y, Liu X, et al. Aberration and contrast sensitivity comparison of aspherical and monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(4):355–60.
Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC, et al. Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(11):1918–24.
Mesci C, Erbil HH, Olgun A, et al. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(8):768–77.
Souza CE, Gerente VM, Chalita MR, et al. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and wavefront analysis: pseudophakic eye with multifocal IOL (ReSTOR) versus fellow phakic eye in non-presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(3):303–5.
Plaza-Puche AB, Alio JL, Sala E, et al. Impact of low mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes in different types of modern multifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(6):612–7.
Lin Z, Huang F, Pan A, et al. Clinical investigation on visual quality after segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Chin J Optomet Ophthalmol. 2017;19(8):482–7.
Jimenez R, Valero A, Fernandez J, et al. Optical quality and visual performance after cataract surgery with biaxial microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(7):1022–8.
Moreno LJ, Pinero DP, Alio JL, et al. Double-pass system analysis of the visual outcomes and optical performance of an apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2048–55.
Gong X, Ye L, Lin Z, et al. Visual quality differences between multifocal intraocular lenses with near additions of +3.00 and +2.50 diopters. Chin J Optomet Ophthalmol. 2017;19(10):606–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 People's Medical Publishing House, PR of China
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yu, AY. (2021). Comparison of the Outcomes of Different Cataract Treatments. In: Yu, AY. (eds) Double-pass Optical Quality Analysis for the Clinical Practice of Cataract. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0435-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0435-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0434-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0435-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)