Abstract
This note considers a new factorization of a fuzzy weak binary preference relation into its asymmetric and symmetric parts. Arrow’s General Possibility Theorem is then examined within the resulting framework of vague individual and social preferences. The outcome of this exercise is compared with some earlier results available in the literature on the Arrow paradox with fuzzy preferences.
This chapter draws heavily and directly on a previously published paper of the author’s, the content from which is re-used here with the permission of the copyright holder: S. Subramanian (2009) The Arrow paradox with fuzzy preferences, Mathematical Social Sciences, 58:2, 265-271, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.05.001. I am grateful to Prasanta Pattanaik and to two anonymous referees of Mathematical Social Sciences for very helpful comments on earlier versions. The usual disclaimer applies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York
Banerjee A (1994) Fuzzy preferences and arrow-type problems in social choice. Soc Choice Welfare 11(2):121–130
Barrett CR, Pattanaik PK, Salles M (1986) On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 19(1):1–10
Barrett CR, Salles M (2006) Social choice with fuzzy preferences. Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 200615, Centre for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS; forthcoming. In Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Available at http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/VPP/VPPpdf/VPPPublications/VPP04_02.pdf
Dasgupta M, Deb R (1999) An impossibility theorem with fuzzy preferences. In: de Swart H (ed) Logic, game theory and social choice. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg [Cited in Barrett and Salles, 2006.]
Dutta B (1987) Fuzzy preferences and social choice. Math Soc Sci 13(3):215–229
Dasgupta, M. and R. Deb (1999): ‘An Impossibility Theorem with Fuzzy Preferences’, in: H. de Swart (ed.): Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice. Tilburg: TilburgUniversity Press. [Cited in Barrett and Salles, 2006.]
Gibbard A (1969) Intransitive social indifference and the arrow dilemma. unpublished [Cited in Barrett and Salles, 2006.]
Richardson G (1998) The structure of fuzzy preferences: social choice implications. Soc Choice Welfare 15(3):359–369
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Subramanian, S. (2021). The Arrow Paradox with Fuzzy Preferences. In: Social Values and Social Indicators. Themes in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0427-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0428-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)