Skip to main content

Liberty, Equality, and Impossibility: Some General Results in the Space of ‘Soft’ Preferences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Values and Social Indicators

Part of the book series: Themes in Economics ((THIE))

  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is concerned with examining the mutual compatibility of the ethical principles of equity and liberty in a social choice framework of ordinally formulated vague preferences. With sufficiently weakened versions of the liberty and equity principles, one can secure an existence result in a ‘relation-functional’ setting. However, difficulties tend to re-appear in a ‘choice-functional’ setting, when one subscribes to the notion that while preference may be vague, choice must perforce be exact.

This chapter draws heavily and directly on a previously published paper of the author's, the content from which is re-used here with the permission of the copyright holder. S. Subramanian (2010) Liberty, equality, and impossibility: some general results in the space of ‘soft’ preferences, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13:4, 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2010.523970.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow KJ (1959) Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica NS 26(101):121–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1977) Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice. Am Econ Rev 67(1):219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A (1994) Fuzzy preferences and arrow-type problems in social choice. Soc Choice Welfare 11(2):121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu K (1984) Fuzzy revealed preference theory. J Econ Theor 32(2):212-227

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Deb R, Pattanaik PK (1992) Soft sets: an ordinal formulation of vagueness with some applications to the theory of choice. Fuzzy Sets Syst 45(1):45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes G (1976) Consistency, rationality and collective choice. Rev Econ Stud 43(3):451–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov D (2004) The paretian liberal with intuitionistic fuzzy preferences: a result. Soc Choice Welfare 23(1):149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta B (1987) Fuzzy preferences and social choice. Math Soc Sci 13(3):215–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta B, Panda SC, Pattanaik PK (1986) Exact choice and fuzzy preferences. Math Soc Sci 11(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard A (1974) A pareto consistent libertarian claim. J Econ Theor 7(4):388–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen JA (1967) L-fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 18(1):145–174 [Cited in Barrett and Pattanaik,1990.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PJ (1976) Equity, arrow’s conditions, and Rawls. Difference principle. Econometrica 44(4):793–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni E (1978) Collective rationality, unanimity and liberal ethics. Rev Econ Stud 45(2):571–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JS (1976) Rights-exercising and a Pareto-Consistent libertarian claim. J Econ Theor 13(1):138–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik PK (1988) On the consistency of libertarian values. Economica NS 55(220):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson G (1998) The structure of fuzzy preferences: social choice implications. Soc Choice Welfare 15(3):359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter M (1966) Revealed preference theory. Econometrica 34(3):635–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley J (1989) Rights to liberty in purely private matters, Part 1. Econ Philos 5:121–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley J (1990) Rights to liberty in purely private matters, Part 2. Econ Philos 6:27–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1970) The impossibility of a paretian liberal. J Polit Econ 78(1):152–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1971) Choice functions and revealed preference. Rev Econ Stud 38(3):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1973) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1976) Liberty, unanimity and rights. Economica NS 43(171):217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1979) Personal utilities and public judgments or what’s wrong with welfare economics? Econ J 89(355):537–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1977) Social choice theory: a re-examination. Econometrica 45(1):53-89

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian S (1987) The liberal paradox with fuzzy preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 4(3):213–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subramanian, S. (2021). Liberty, Equality, and Impossibility: Some General Results in the Space of ‘Soft’ Preferences. In: Social Values and Social Indicators. Themes in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0427-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0428-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics