Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Uncertainty and Operations Research ((UOR))

  • 504 Accesses

Abstract

Although the classical TODIM considers relative importance of attributes, this method neither provides an appropriate way to determine the weights of attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This reference introduced investigated data about attributes used by VCs in numerous countries and we comprehensively aggregated those data as the weights of attributes in this chapter. We believe that those comprehensive weights are reasonable.

  2. 2.

    The VCs give each attribute of each alternative a value. Furthermore, the value ranges from 0 to 100. For the benefit attribute, the higher of the value is, the better of the alternative will be. It is contrary for the cost attribute.

References

  1. Mattos F, Garcia P (2011) Applications of behavioral finance to entrepreneurs and venture capitalists: decision making under risk and uncertainty in futures and options markets. Advances in Entrepreneurial Finance, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tian XL, Xu ZS, Gu J (2019) An extended TODIM based on cumulative prospect theory and its application in venture capital. Informatica 30(2):413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Widyanto HA, Dalimunthe Z (2015) Evaluation criteria of venture capital firms investing on indonesians’ SME. Social Science Electronic Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  4. Félix EGS, Nunes JC, Pires CP (2014) Which criteria matter most in the evaluation of venture capital investments? CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 21(3):505–527

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monika, Sharma AK (2015) Venture capitalists’ investment decision criteria for new ventures: a review. In: Ramesh A, Prakash G (eds) Operations management in digital economy. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 465–470

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes LFAM, Lima MMPP (1991) TODIM: basic and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Paris 16(January):113–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoli Tian .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tian, X., Xu, Z. (2021). An Improved TODIM Based on PT. In: Fuzzy Decision-Making Methods Based on Prospect Theory and Its Application in Venture Capital. Uncertainty and Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0243-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics