Skip to main content

Attentional Bias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Making in Emergency Medicine
  • 1498 Accesses

Abstract

Attentional bias is believing there is a relationship between two variables when instances are found of both being present. More attention is paid to this condition than when either variable is absent from the other. So, if A and B are present we immediately think the diagnosis must be C, perhaps to the exclusion of other possibilities. But if we only see A or B we may forget to think of the C diagnosis. We often think of diagnostic decision making as considering the compilation of risk factors, symptoms, and signs. In many instances, this is indeed the case. But sometimes, a sole symptom or sign may be present which alone can lead us to the correct diagnosis. Not everyone has to have every “thing”. Likewise, just because two symptoms are together does not always mean that the diagnosis is certain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, et al. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Sullivan ED, Schofield SJ. Cognitive bias in clinical medicine. JR Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018;48(3):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graber ML, Kissam S, Payne VL, et al. Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):535–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Croskerry P, Norman G. Overconfidence in clinical decision making. Am J Med. 2008;121(5):S24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wills, P. (2021). Attentional Bias. In: Raz, M., Pouryahya, P. (eds) Decision Making in Emergency Medicine. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0142-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0143-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics