Skip to main content

Ambiguity Bias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Making in Emergency Medicine
  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

What would you say if you were offered: either 200 dollars now or a mystery sum of money which might be lower, higher, or the same value as the initial offer? Alternatively, imagine you were late for a meeting, you could take your standard route where you know the likely time of arrival or you could try a new course that may improve your travel time, but alternatively could make us even later?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Croskerry P. ED cognition: any decision by anyone at any time. CJEM. 2014;16(1):13–9. PMID: 24423996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Han PK, Reeve BB, Moser RP, Klein WM. Aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: measurement, prevalence, and relationship to sociodemographic factors. J Health Commun. 2009;14(6):556–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730903089630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard J. Cognitive errors and diagnostic mistakes: a case-based guide to critical thinking in medicine. Cham: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93224-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Inukai K, Takahashi T. Decision under ambiguity: effects of sign and magnitude. Int J Neurosci. 2009;119(8):1170–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450802174472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Osmont A, Cassotti M, Agogué M, Houdé O, Moutier S. Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making? Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;22(2):572–7. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Sheffield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sheffield, E. (2021). Ambiguity Bias. In: Raz, M., Pouryahya, P. (eds) Decision Making in Emergency Medicine. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0142-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0143-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics