Skip to main content

Developing the P.O.L.E Framework for User Subjective Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 223))

  • 1188 Accesses

Abstract

Thomas Nagel in his paper, ‘What is it like to be a bat?’ highlights the problem of subjective experience. He talks about the problem of subjectivity, of how an observer, if not a bat, can never fully understand what it is like to be a bat. This paper takes on the above problem and attempts to utilize it to theoretically deduce that the problem of user subjectivity can be logically dismantled and the information gained can help in the domain of design processes. The P.O.L.E framework tries to utilize on the social and biological aspect of the user’s subjectivity and attempts to break it down by engaging in the pre-design stage of task-clarification. It aims at providing a more holistic perception of the user, by piecing together the various influences that might affect an individual’s subjectivity. The proposed framework is in its adolescence, but shows the potential to establish a base of information before the design process takes place. The research concludes with tentative future plans of how this framework will be further deployed and tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cochran, B., Thompson, G.: Why new products fail. In: The National Industrial Conference Board Record, vol. 1, pp. 11–18 (1964, Oct)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaturvedi, K.J., Rajan, Y.S.: New product development: challenges of globalisation. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 19(7–8), 788–805 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poolton, J., Ismail, H.S., Shahidipour, S.M.M.: The new products process: effective knowledge capture and utilisation. Concurr. Eng. 8(2), 133–143 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 37(4), pp. 445–456. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miaskiewicz, T., Kozar, K.A.: Personas and user-centered design: how can personas benefit product design processes? Des. Stud. 32(5), 417–430 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schregenberger, J.W.: The further development of design methodologies. In: Designers, pp. 57–67. Springer, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asch, S.E.: Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. General Appl. 70(9), 1 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milgram, S.: Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67(4), 371 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett, L.F., Bar, M.: See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 364(1521), 1325–1334 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vernon, P.E.: The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In: Handbook of Creativity, pp. 93–110. Springer, Boston, MA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leahy, A.M.: Nature-nurture and intelligence. Genet. Psychol. Monogr. (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagel, T.: What is it like to be a bat? Philos. Rev. 83(4), 435–450 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bridger, R.: Introduction to Ergonomics. CRC Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fenko, A., Schifferstein, H.N., Hekkert, P.: Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user–product interactions. Appl. Ergon. 41(1), 34–40 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richmond, J., Nelson, C.A.: Accounting for change in declarative memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Dev. Rev. 27(3), 349–373 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rani, P.: Factors influencing consumer behaviour. Int. J. Curr. Res. Acad. Rev. 2(9), 52–61 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bilkey, W.J., Nes, E.: Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 13(1), 89–100 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moschis, G.P., Moore, R.L.: Decision making among the young: a socialization perspective. J. Consum. Res. 6(2), 101–112 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherman, E., Mathur, A., Smith, R.B.: Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychol. Mark. 14(4), 361–378 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Astronomy Corner: 4th Dimension—Tesseract, 4th Dimension Made Easy—Carl Sagan [Video File] (2011, Aug 10). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0WjV6MmCyM

  21. Carroll, S.M.: Extra Dimensions (2004, June 30). Retrieved from https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2004/06/30/extra-dimensions/

  22. Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Psychology Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Duesenberry, J.S.: Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gbadamosi, A.: Cognitive dissonance. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Payne, J., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J.: Consumer decision making. In: Handbook of Consumer Behaviour, pp. 50–84 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abbott, E.A., Abbott, E.A.: Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Penguin (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dennett, D.C.: Welcome to strong illusionism. J. Conscious. Stud. 26(9–10), 48–58 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahlawat, A.S., Dhiman, A., Singh, A.: Arms regulation in India: perception towards the implications of relaxed gun norms in India. Int. J. Res. Soc. Sci. 6(10), 291–303 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A.H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M.J., Merrill, L.: Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol. Bull. 135(4), 555 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberge, R.J.: Face shields for infection control: a review face shields for infection control: a review (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Caplan, S.: Using focus group methodology for ergonomic design. Ergonomics 33(5), 527–533 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Applegate, R.: Models of user satisfaction: understanding false positives. RQ, 525–539 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaitanya Solanki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Solanki, C. (2021). Developing the P.O.L.E Framework for User Subjective Experience. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 223. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0083-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0084-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics